• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于心理学研究中功效分析实践演变的系统综述。

A Systematic Review on the Evolution of Power Analysis Practices in Psychological Research.

作者信息

Vankelecom Lara, Schacht Ole, Laroy Nathan, Loeys Tom, Moerkerke Beatrijs

机构信息

Department of Data-Analysis, Ghent University, Belgium.

Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Belgium.

出版信息

Psychol Belg. 2025 Jan 9;65(1):17-37. doi: 10.5334/pb.1318. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.5334/pb.1318
PMID:39802672
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11720577/
Abstract

Performing hypothesis tests with adequate statistical power is indispensable for psychological research. In response to several large-scale replication projects following the replication crisis, concerns about the root causes of this crisis - such as questionable research practices (QRPs) - have grown. While initial efforts primarily addressed the inflation of the type I error rate of research due to QRPs, recent attention has shifted to the adverse consequences of low statistical power. In this paper we first argue how underpowered studies, in combination with publication bias, contribute to a literature rife with false positive results and overestimated effect sizes. We then examine whether the prevalence of power analyses in psychological research has effectively increased over time in response to the increased awareness regarding these phenomena. To address this, we conducted a systematic review of 903 published empirical articles across four APA-disciplines, comparing 453 papers published in 2015-2016, with 450 papers from 2020-2021. Although the prevalence of power analysis across different domains in psychology has increased over time (from 9.5% to 30%), it remains insufficient overall. We conclude by discussing the implications of these findings and elaborating on some alternative methods to power analysis that can help ensure sufficient statistical power.

摘要

进行具有足够统计效力的假设检验对心理学研究来说必不可少。针对复制危机之后的几个大规模复制项目,人们对这场危机的根源(如可疑的研究行为)的担忧与日俱增。虽然最初的努力主要解决了因可疑研究行为导致的研究I类错误率膨胀问题,但最近的关注点已转向统计效力低下的不良后果。在本文中,我们首先论证了效力不足的研究与发表偏倚相结合,是如何导致充斥着假阳性结果和高估效应大小的文献的。然后,我们考察了随着时间推移,心理学研究中功效分析的普及率是否因对这些现象的认识提高而有效增加。为解决这一问题,我们对美国心理学会四个学科领域的903篇已发表实证文章进行了系统综述,比较了2015 - 2016年发表的453篇论文和2020 - 2021年发表的450篇论文。尽管心理学不同领域功效分析的普及率随时间有所增加(从9.5%增至30%),但总体上仍显不足。我们通过讨论这些发现的意义并详细阐述一些功效分析的替代方法来结束本文,这些方法有助于确保足够的统计效力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7b6/11720577/e5c43e3fb973/pb-65-1-1318-g6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7b6/11720577/dceb8455ee9a/pb-65-1-1318-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7b6/11720577/69b8aa01b568/pb-65-1-1318-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7b6/11720577/255b8d13b0e3/pb-65-1-1318-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7b6/11720577/26af84acfc1c/pb-65-1-1318-g4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7b6/11720577/35b9c5e601fb/pb-65-1-1318-g5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7b6/11720577/e5c43e3fb973/pb-65-1-1318-g6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7b6/11720577/dceb8455ee9a/pb-65-1-1318-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7b6/11720577/69b8aa01b568/pb-65-1-1318-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7b6/11720577/255b8d13b0e3/pb-65-1-1318-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7b6/11720577/26af84acfc1c/pb-65-1-1318-g4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7b6/11720577/35b9c5e601fb/pb-65-1-1318-g5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7b6/11720577/e5c43e3fb973/pb-65-1-1318-g6.jpg

相似文献

1
A Systematic Review on the Evolution of Power Analysis Practices in Psychological Research.关于心理学研究中功效分析实践演变的系统综述。
Psychol Belg. 2025 Jan 9;65(1):17-37. doi: 10.5334/pb.1318. eCollection 2025.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Publication bias impacts on effect size, statistical power, and magnitude (Type M) and sign (Type S) errors in ecology and evolutionary biology.发表偏倚对生态学和进化生物学中的效应大小、统计功效和幅度(M 型)以及符号(S 型)错误有影响。
BMC Biol. 2023 Apr 3;21(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12915-022-01485-y.
4
Questionable research practices and cumulative science: The consequences of selective reporting on effect size bias and heterogeneity.可疑的研究行为与累积科学:选择性报告对效应量偏差和异质性的影响
Psychol Methods. 2023 Mar 23. doi: 10.1037/met0000572.
5
Replication concerns in sports and exercise science: a narrative review of selected methodological issues in the field.体育与运动科学中的重复研究问题:对该领域若干选定方法学问题的叙述性综述
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Dec 14;9(12):220946. doi: 10.1098/rsos.220946. eCollection 2022 Dec.
6
Publication bias, statistical power and reporting practices in the Journal of Sports Sciences: potential barriers to replicability.《运动科学杂志》中的发表偏倚、统计效力及报告规范:可重复性的潜在障碍
J Sports Sci. 2023 Sep;41(16):1507-1517. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2023.2269357. Epub 2023 Dec 11.
7
What meta-analyses reveal about the replicability of psychological research.元分析揭示了心理学研究的可重复性。
Psychol Bull. 2018 Dec;144(12):1325-1346. doi: 10.1037/bul0000169. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
8
Power, effects, confidence, and significance: an investigation of statistical practices in nursing research.功效、效应、置信度与显著性:护理研究中的统计实践调查
Int J Nurs Stud. 2014 May;51(5):795-806. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.09.014. Epub 2013 Oct 9.
9
"What meta-analyses reveal about the replicability of psychological research": Correction to Stanley, Carter, and Doucouliagos (2018).“元分析揭示了心理学研究的可重复性”:对斯坦利、卡特和杜库利亚戈斯(2018年)的修正
Psychol Bull. 2019 Jul;145(7):764. doi: 10.1037/bul0000203.
10
Deployment of personnel to military operations: impact on mental health and social functioning.人员部署到军事行动中:对心理健康和社会功能的影响。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 1;14(1):1-127. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.6. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Uses of uncertain statistical power: Designing future studies, not evaluating completed studies.不确定统计功效的用途:设计未来研究,而非评估已完成的研究。
Psychol Methods. 2024 Sep 19. doi: 10.1037/met0000577.
2
Power to Detect What? Considerations for Planning and Evaluating Sample Size.检测什么的能力?规划和评估样本量的考虑因素。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2024 Aug;28(3):276-301. doi: 10.1177/10888683241228328. Epub 2024 Feb 12.
3
Finding the right power balance: Better study design and collaboration can reduce dependence on statistical power.
找到合适的权力平衡:更好的研究设计和协作可以减少对统计功效的依赖。
PLoS Biol. 2024 Jan 8;22(1):e3002423. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002423. eCollection 2024 Jan.
4
The logical structure of experiments lays the foundation for a theory of reproducibility.实验的逻辑结构为可重复性理论奠定了基础。
R Soc Open Sci. 2023 Mar 15;10(3):221042. doi: 10.1098/rsos.221042. eCollection 2023 Mar.
5
Big little lies: a compendium and simulation of -hacking strategies.弥天大谎:-黑客攻击策略汇编与模拟
R Soc Open Sci. 2023 Feb 8;10(2):220346. doi: 10.1098/rsos.220346. eCollection 2023 Feb.
6
Retraction (mal)practices of elite marketing and social psychology journals in the Dirk Smeesters' research misconduct case.在德克·斯梅斯特斯研究不当行为案件中,精英营销与社会心理学期刊的撤稿(不当)行为
Account Res. 2024 Oct;31(7):751-766. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2022.2164489. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
7
Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science.心理科学中的可重复性、稳健性和再现性。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2022 Jan 4;73:719-748. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-020821-114157. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
8
Retrospective median power, false positive meta-analysis and large-scale replication.回顾中位功率、假阳性荟萃分析和大规模复制。
Res Synth Methods. 2022 Jan;13(1):88-108. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1529. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
9
Initial evidence of research quality of registered reports compared with the standard publishing model.注册报告与标准出版模式的研究质量初步证据比较。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Aug;5(8):990-997. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01142-4. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
10
A manifesto for reproducible science.可重复科学宣言。
Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Jan 10;1(1):0021. doi: 10.1038/s41562-016-0021.