• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

如何在放射学和介入放射学领域开展高质量的系统评价和Meta分析。

How to Conduct High-Quality Systematic Review and Meta-analysis in Radiology and Interventional Radiology.

作者信息

Shaw Manish, Sharma Sanjiv

机构信息

Department of Interventional Radiology, National Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.

Department of Interventional Radiology, NIMSR, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.

出版信息

Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2025 Jan 9;35(Suppl 1):S128-S135. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1793811. eCollection 2025 Jan.

DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1793811
PMID:39802713
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11717467/
Abstract

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses form a secondary research methodology that identifies and critically appraises all the relevant studies that are available in various databases to answer a particular research question in an unbiased and systematic manner. In the pyramid of level of evidence, the systematic review of high-quality studies is placed at the highest hierarchy position. Meta-analysis is the statistical analysis of the systematic review that provides pooled estimates of the effect of individual studies in the systematic review, but sometimes a meta-analysis may not always be possible. This article elaborates the key steps to conduct a high-quality systematic review and meta-analysis in the field of radiology and intervention radiology, which will help the readers to design and conduct them along with to understand and interpret this secondary research.

摘要

系统评价和荟萃分析构成了一种二次研究方法,该方法以无偏且系统的方式识别并严格评估各种数据库中所有可用的相关研究,以回答特定的研究问题。在证据等级金字塔中,高质量研究的系统评价处于最高层级。荟萃分析是对系统评价的统计分析,它提供了系统评价中各项独立研究效应的合并估计值,但有时荟萃分析并非总是可行。本文阐述了在放射学和介入放射学领域进行高质量系统评价和荟萃分析的关键步骤,这将有助于读者设计和开展此类研究,同时理解和解读这种二次研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a8b/11717467/80abe7cf96c3/10-1055-s-0044-1793811-i2493723-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a8b/11717467/5961e1a8ad11/10-1055-s-0044-1793811-i2493723-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a8b/11717467/80abe7cf96c3/10-1055-s-0044-1793811-i2493723-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a8b/11717467/5961e1a8ad11/10-1055-s-0044-1793811-i2493723-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a8b/11717467/80abe7cf96c3/10-1055-s-0044-1793811-i2493723-2.jpg

相似文献

1
How to Conduct High-Quality Systematic Review and Meta-analysis in Radiology and Interventional Radiology.如何在放射学和介入放射学领域开展高质量的系统评价和Meta分析。
Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2025 Jan 9;35(Suppl 1):S128-S135. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1793811. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis: A Guide for Beginners.系统评价和荟萃分析:初学者指南。
Indian Pediatr. 2022 Apr 15;59(4):320-330. doi: 10.1007/s13312-022-2500-y. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
5
Interventional radiology versus operative management for splenic injuries: a study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.脾损伤的介入放射学与手术治疗:一项系统评价和荟萃分析的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 10;9(8):e028172. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028172.
6
Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 3: systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized trials.基于证据的医学、系统评价以及介入性疼痛管理指南:第3部分:随机试验的系统评价与荟萃分析
Pain Physician. 2009 Jan-Feb;12(1):35-72.
7
How to review and assess a systematic review and meta-analysis article: a methodological study (secondary publication).如何评价和综述系统评价和荟萃分析文章:方法学研究(二次出版物)。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2023;20:24. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2023.20.24. Epub 2023 Aug 27.
8
Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.基于证据的医学、系统评价以及介入性疼痛管理指南:第6部分。观察性研究的系统评价与荟萃分析
Pain Physician. 2009 Sep-Oct;12(5):819-50.
9
Evidence-based practice in radiology: steps 3 and 4--appraise and apply systematic reviews and meta-analyses.放射学中的循证实践:第3步和第4步——评估与应用系统评价和荟萃分析。
Radiology. 2007 Apr;243(1):13-27. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2431051823.
10
Methodology Series Module 6: Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis.方法学系列模块6:系统评价与Meta分析。
Indian J Dermatol. 2016 Nov-Dec;61(6):602-607. doi: 10.4103/0019-5154.193663.

本文引用的文献

1
Updated recommendations for the Cochrane rapid review methods guidance for rapid reviews of effectiveness.Cochrane有效性快速综述方法指南的更新建议。
BMJ. 2024 Feb 6;384:e076335. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-076335.
2
How to perform and write a systematic review and meta-analysis.如何进行及撰写系统评价与Meta分析。
Child Health Nurs Res. 2023 Jul;29(3):161-165. doi: 10.4094/chnr.2023.29.3.161. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
3
Steps for Conducting a Scoping Review.进行范围综述的步骤。
J Grad Med Educ. 2022 Oct;14(5):565-567. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-22-00621.1.
4
Where to prospectively register a systematic review.在哪里前瞻性地注册系统评价。
Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 8;11(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01877-1.
5
Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis: A Guide for Beginners.系统评价和荟萃分析:初学者指南。
Indian Pediatr. 2022 Apr 15;59(4):320-330. doi: 10.1007/s13312-022-2500-y. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
6
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
7
Understanding the Basics of Meta-Analysis and How to Read a Forest Plot: As Simple as It Gets.了解元分析的基础知识以及如何阅读森林图:就这么简单。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2020 Oct 6;81(5):20f13698. doi: 10.4088/JCP.20f13698.
8
AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both.AMSTAR 2:一种用于系统评价的关键评估工具,该系统评价包括医疗保健干预措施的随机或非随机研究,或两者皆有。
BMJ. 2017 Sep 21;358:j4008. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j4008.
9
Network meta-analysis: an introduction for clinicians.网状Meta分析:临床医生指南
Intern Emerg Med. 2017 Feb;12(1):103-111. doi: 10.1007/s11739-016-1583-7. Epub 2016 Dec 2.
10
Knowledge Syntheses in Medical Education: Demystifying Scoping Reviews.医学教育中的知识综合:解读范围综述
Acad Med. 2017 Feb;92(2):161-166. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001452.