• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

把握词规范中的差异:运动想象和语义评级中的个体差异。

Grasping Variance in Word Norms: Individual Differences in Motor Imagery and Semantic Ratings.

作者信息

Muraki Emiko J, Born Sydney, Pexman Penny M

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.

Department of Psychology, Western University, London, Canada.

出版信息

J Cogn. 2025 Jan 7;8(1):12. doi: 10.5334/joc.418. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.5334/joc.418
PMID:39803178
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11720573/
Abstract

Word norming datasets have become an important resource for psycholinguistic research, and they are based on the underlying assumption that individual differences are inconsequential to the measurement of semantic dimensions. In this pre-registered study we tested this assumption by examining whether individual differences in motor imagery are related to variance in semantic ratings. We collected graspability ratings (i.e., how easily a word's referent can be grasped using one hand) for 350 words and also had each participant complete a series of motor imagery questionnaires. Using linear mixed effect models we tested whether measures of motor imagery ability (e.g., the Florida Praxis Imagery Questionnaire and the Test of Ability in Movement Imagery for Hands) and motor imagery vividness (e.g., the Vividness of Movement Imagery Questionnaire 2) could account for variance (raw and absolute difference scores) in graspability ratings. We observed a significant relationship between motor imagery vividness and absolute rating difference scores, wherein people with more vivid motor imagery provided ratings that were further from the mean word ratings. However there was no relationship between motor imagery and raw rating difference scores. The results suggest that there are measurable systematic differences in how participants make sensorimotor semantic ratings, which has implications for how sensorimotor semantic word norms are used for investigations of lexical semantic processing.

摘要

词汇规范数据集已成为心理语言学研究的重要资源,它们基于这样一种潜在假设,即个体差异对于语义维度的测量无关紧要。在这项预先注册的研究中,我们通过检验运动意象的个体差异是否与语义评级的方差相关来测试这一假设。我们收集了350个单词的可抓握性评级(即一个单词的所指对象用一只手能多容易被抓住),并且让每位参与者完成一系列运动意象问卷。使用线性混合效应模型,我们测试了运动意象能力的测量指标(例如,佛罗里达动作意象问卷和手部运动意象能力测试)和运动意象生动性(例如,运动意象生动性问卷2)是否能够解释可抓握性评级中的方差(原始分数和绝对差异分数)。我们观察到运动意象生动性与绝对评级差异分数之间存在显著关系,即运动意象更生动的人给出的评级与单词平均评级的差距更大。然而,运动意象与原始评级差异分数之间没有关系。结果表明,参与者在进行感觉运动语义评级时存在可测量的系统差异,这对感觉运动语义词汇规范如何用于词汇语义加工的研究具有启示意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ca9/11720573/4fbf0d6aaa59/joc-8-1-418-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ca9/11720573/8ae1dfa1c11f/joc-8-1-418-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ca9/11720573/4fbf0d6aaa59/joc-8-1-418-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ca9/11720573/8ae1dfa1c11f/joc-8-1-418-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ca9/11720573/4fbf0d6aaa59/joc-8-1-418-g2.jpg

相似文献

1
Grasping Variance in Word Norms: Individual Differences in Motor Imagery and Semantic Ratings.把握词规范中的差异:运动想象和语义评级中的个体差异。
J Cogn. 2025 Jan 7;8(1):12. doi: 10.5334/joc.418. eCollection 2025.
2
Meaning in hand: Investigating shared mechanisms of motor imagery and sensorimotor simulation in language processing.手上的意义:探索语言处理中运动意象和运动模拟的共享机制。
Cognition. 2023 Nov;240:105589. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105589. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
3
Getting a grip on sensorimotor effects in lexical-semantic processing.把握词汇语义加工中的感觉运动效应。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Feb;51(1):1-13. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1072-1.
4
Simulating semantics: Are individual differences in motor imagery related to sensorimotor effects in language processing?模拟语义:运动想象中的个体差异与语言处理中的感觉运动效应有关吗?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2021 Dec;47(12):1939-1957. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001039. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
5
Quantifying children's sensorimotor experience: Child body-object interaction ratings for 3359 English words.量化儿童的感觉运动体验:3359 个英语单词的儿童身体-物体互动评分。
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Dec;54(6):2864-2877. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01798-4. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
6
Quantifying sensorimotor experience: Body-object interaction ratings for more than 9,000 English words.量化感觉运动体验:9000 多个英语单词的身体-物体相互作用评级。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Apr;51(2):453-466. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1171-z.
7
[Norms of subjective frequency of use and imagery for a sample of 1,916 French nouns].[1916个法语名词样本的主观使用频率和意象规范]
Can J Exp Psychol. 2000 Dec;54(4):274-325.
8
A generative approach to extrapolate word concreteness ratings.一种用于推断单词具体性评级的生成方法。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2025 Mar 4:17470218251320641. doi: 10.1177/17470218251320641.
9
A comparison of word humor ratings across speakers of North American, British, and Singapore English.北美英语、英国英语和新加坡英语使用者的词汇幽默评级比较。
Mem Cognit. 2025 Feb;53(2):568-589. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01587-8. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
10
Motor imagery vividness and symptom severity in Parkinson's disease.帕金森病的运动想象鲜明度与症状严重程度。
J Neuropsychol. 2023 Mar;17(1):180-192. doi: 10.1111/jnp.12293. Epub 2022 Oct 13.

本文引用的文献

1
The role of individual differences in emotional word recognition: Insights from a large-scale lexical decision study.个体差异在情绪词汇识别中的作用:来自大规模词汇判断研究的启示。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Dec;56(8):8501-8520. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02488-z. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
2
A comparison of word humor ratings across speakers of North American, British, and Singapore English.北美英语、英国英语和新加坡英语使用者的词汇幽默评级比较。
Mem Cognit. 2025 Feb;53(2):568-589. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01587-8. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
3
The Development of Abstract Word Meanings.
抽象词意义的发展
J Child Lang. 2023 Oct 4:1-13. doi: 10.1017/S0305000923000569.
4
Meaning in hand: Investigating shared mechanisms of motor imagery and sensorimotor simulation in language processing.手上的意义:探索语言处理中运动意象和运动模拟的共享机制。
Cognition. 2023 Nov;240:105589. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105589. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
5
Quantifying children's sensorimotor experience: Child body-object interaction ratings for 3359 English words.量化儿童的感觉运动体验:3359 个英语单词的儿童身体-物体互动评分。
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Dec;54(6):2864-2877. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01798-4. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
6
Simulating semantics: Are individual differences in motor imagery related to sensorimotor effects in language processing?模拟语义:运动想象中的个体差异与语言处理中的感觉运动效应有关吗?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2021 Dec;47(12):1939-1957. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001039. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
7
Age-related evaluations of imageability and subjective frequency for 1286 neutral and emotional French words: ratings by young, middle-aged, and older adults.1286 个中性和情感法语单词的可想象性和主观频率的年龄相关评估:年轻人、中年人、老年人的评分。
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Feb;54(1):196-215. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01621-6. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
8
Investigating the roles of age, sex, depression, and anxiety for valence and arousal ratings of words: a population-based study.调查年龄、性别、抑郁和焦虑对词语效价和唤醒度评价的作用:一项基于人群的研究。
BMC Psychol. 2020 Nov 7;8(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s40359-020-00485-3.
9
"Embodied" language processing: Mental motor imagery aptitude predicts word-definition skill for high but not for low imageable words in adolescents.“具身”语言处理:心理运动意象能力预测青少年对高但不对低形象词的词义技能。
Brain Cogn. 2020 Nov;145:105628. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2020.105628. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
10
Vampires and nurses are rated differently by younger and older adults-Age-comparative norms of imageability and emotionality for about 2500 German nouns.年轻人和老年人对吸血鬼和护士的评价不同——约 2500 个德语名词的形象性和情感性的年龄比较规范。
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Jun;52(3):980-989. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01294-2.