Suppr超能文献

分析化学中使用的美国官方分析化学师协会(AOAC)分析方法的变异性。

The variability of AOAC methods of analysis as used in analytical pharmaceutical chemistry.

作者信息

Horwitz W

出版信息

J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1977 Nov;60(6):1355-63.

PMID:924941
Abstract

Pharmaceutical analytical chemistry, which ordinarily deals with the analysis of formulations containing from 0.1 to 100% of active ingredient, uses methods with a reproducibility (between-laboratory variability) of about 2.5% and a repeatability (within-laboratory variability) of about half that amount. The best between-laboratory precision attainable appears to be about 1.0% and within-laboratory precision, about 0.5%. On the basis of the results available, automated methods do not appear to be any more precise than manual methods, although the studies show fewer outlying data points. Replicates (preferably blind ones) should always be conducted in a collaborative interlaboratory study in order to obtain the important information as to whether efforts should be concentrated on improving the method itself or on the performance of laboratories and analysis in applying it.

摘要

药物分析化学通常处理含有0.1%至100%活性成分的制剂分析,其使用的方法具有约2.5%的重现性(实验室间变异性)和约该数值一半的重复性(实验室内变异性)。可达到的最佳实验室间精密度似乎约为1.0%,实验室内精密度约为0.5%。根据现有结果,尽管研究显示异常数据点较少,但自动化方法似乎并不比手动方法更精确。在协作性实验室间研究中应始终进行重复测定(最好是盲样重复),以便获取重要信息,即应将精力集中在改进方法本身,还是集中在实验室在应用该方法时的性能和分析上。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验