Fein D, Waterhouse L, Lucci D, Snyder D
J Autism Dev Disord. 1985 Mar;15(1):77-95. doi: 10.1007/BF01837900.
Differential diagnoses within the pervasive developmental disorders have insufficient reliability, validity, and descriptive homogeneity within groups to be used as distinct categories for research purposes. This study reports the results of cognitive subtyping of 54 developmentally disabled children. Fifty-one were successfully categorized in a small number of groups, characterized by different strengths and weaknesses on verbal, performance, memory, and quantitative tests. About half of the children had the relatively good visuospatial performance expected on the basis of previous literature on autistic children; these children were not behaviorally more autistic than the others. Measures of internal validity are reported, as well as validation by cognitive and behavioral variables. These results tentatively suggest that such psychiatric manifestations as autistic aloofness and maintenance of sameness may be relatively independent of cognitive skill patterns.
广泛性发育障碍中的鉴别诊断在可靠性、有效性以及组内描述同质性方面均不足,无法用作研究目的的不同类别。本研究报告了54名发育障碍儿童认知亚型分类的结果。51名儿童成功被分为少数几组,其特点是在语言、操作、记忆和定量测试中存在不同的优势和劣势。约一半儿童具有根据先前关于自闭症儿童的文献所预期的相对良好的视觉空间表现;这些儿童在行为上并不比其他儿童更具自闭症特征。报告了内部效度的测量结果以及通过认知和行为变量进行的验证。这些结果初步表明,诸如自闭症式冷漠和保持同一性等精神症状可能相对独立于认知技能模式。