Bastos Diogo Assed, Soares Andrey, Schutz Fabio Augusto Barros, Cronemberger Eduardo, de Almeida Luz Murilo, Martins Suelen Patricia Dos Santos, Muniz David Queiroz Borges, Cárcano Flavio Mavignier, Smaletz Oren, Peixoto Fábio Affonso, Gomes Andrea Juliana, Cruz Felipe Melo, Franke Fábio André, Herchenhorn Daniel, Gidekel Rosemarie, Werutsky Gustavo, Rebelatto Taiane Francieli, Gomes de Jesus Rafaela, Souza Vinicius Carrera, Fay André Poisl, Maluf Fernando Cotait
Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(1):e2454253. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.54253.
The open-label randomized phase 2 LACOG0415 trial evaluated 3 treatment strategies for patients with advanced castration-sensitive prostate cancer (CSPC): androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) plus abiraterone acetate and prednisone (AAP), apalutamide (APA) alone, or APA plus AAP.
To investigate the association of ADT plus AAP, APA alone, or APA plus AAP with health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with advanced CSPC in the LACOG0415 trial.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The LACOG0415 randomized clinical trial comprised 128 patients with advanced CSPC who were randomized (1:1:1) to 1 of 3 treatment arms from October 16, 2017, to April 23, 2019. Statistical analysis was conducted from March to September 2022.
Patients were randomized (1:1:1) to 1 of 3 treatment arms: ADT plus AAP, APA alone, or APA plus AAP.
Health-related quality of life was evaluated using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) questionnaire, including its subscales, completed at baseline and every 4 weeks until week 25. FACT-P scores range from 0 to 156, and higher scores indicate better HRQOL. Mean changes in score from baseline to week 25 were adjusted by baseline score and were calculated to evaluate whether there was a difference according to the treatment arm using a mixed-effect model for repeated measures. Time to deterioration was estimated by Kaplan-Meier curves and compared by stratified log-rank test. Analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis.
A total of 128 patients with advanced CSPC were randomized to receive ADT plus AAP (n = 42; median age, 69.8 years [IQR, 58.9-71.6 years]), APA alone (n = 42; median age, 69.5 years [IQR, 59.8-72.6 years]), or APA plus AAP (n = 44; median age, 71.0 years [IQR, 63.0-72.3 years]). Metastatic disease was present in 95 patients (74.2%), high-risk biochemical recurrence disease in 22 (17.2%), and locally advanced disease in 11 (8.6%). There was no significant difference in baseline mean (SD) FACT-P total scores and subscales among the 3 treatment arms (FACT-P total score: ADT plus AAP arm, 118.5 [24.3]; APA alone arm, 116.1 [23.9]; AAP plus APA arm, 114.9 [18.1]; P = .69). Health-related quality of life was maintained during treatment period, and there were no statistically significant differences at 25 weeks in mean (SD) FACT-P total scores or subscales between treatment arms (FACT-P total score: ADT plus AAP arm, 122.3 [20.4]; APA alone arm, 119.5 [16.4]; AAP plus APA arm, 119.9 [20.3]). The APA alone and AAP plus APA arms were not associated with meaningful improvements in HRQOL compared with the ADT plus AAP arm, except in time to deterioration of the emotional well-being score, which was more favorable in the APA alone arm (reference arm: ADT plus AAP arm; APA alone arm: hazard ratio, 0.37 [0.15-0.85]; P = .02; ADT plus AAP arm: hazard ratio, 0.56 [0.26-1.19]; P = .13). Limitations include short follow-up period and the absence of other questionnaires to capture differences between therapies.
In this prespecified secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial of ADT plus AAP, APA alone, or APA plus AAP for patients with advanced CSPC, HRQOL was not statistically different between treatments with APA alone or APA plus AAP as compared with ADT plus AAP. Larger studies with longer follow-up and more specific questionnaires are needed to further evaluate HRQOL with these treatment strategies.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02867020.
开放标签的随机2期LACOG0415试验评估了晚期去势敏感性前列腺癌(CSPC)患者的3种治疗策略:雄激素剥夺疗法(ADT)联合醋酸阿比特龙和泼尼松(AAP)、单独使用阿帕他胺(APA)或APA联合AAP。
在LACOG0415试验中,研究ADT联合AAP、单独使用APA或APA联合AAP与晚期CSPC患者健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)之间的关联。
设计、设置和参与者:LACOG0415随机临床试验纳入了128例晚期CSPC患者,这些患者于2017年10月16日至2019年4月23日被随机(1:1:1)分配至3个治疗组中的1组。统计分析于2022年3月至9月进行。
患者被随机(1:1:1)分配至3个治疗组中的1组:ADT联合AAP、单独使用APA或APA联合AAP。
使用癌症治疗功能评估-前列腺(FACT-P)问卷评估健康相关生活质量,包括其各个子量表,在基线时以及每4周直至第25周完成评估。FACT-P评分范围为0至156分,分数越高表明HRQOL越好。从基线到第25周的评分平均变化通过基线评分进行调整,并使用重复测量的混合效应模型计算,以评估根据治疗组是否存在差异。通过Kaplan-Meier曲线估计恶化时间,并通过分层对数秩检验进行比较。分析按意向性治疗原则进行。
共有128例晚期CSPC患者被随机分配接受ADT联合AAP(n = 42;中位年龄,69.8岁[四分位间距,58.9 - 71.6岁])、单独使用APA(n = 42;中位年龄,69.5岁[四分位间距,59.8 - 72.6岁])或APA联合AAP(n = 44;中位年龄,71.0岁[四分位间距,63.0 - 72.3岁])。95例患者(74.2%)存在转移性疾病,22例(占17.2%)存在高危生化复发疾病,11例(占8.6%)存在局部晚期疾病。3个治疗组之间的基线FACT-P总分平均值(标准差)和子量表无显著差异(FACT-P总分:ADT联合AAP组,118.5[24.3];单独使用APA组,116.1[23.9];AAP联合APA组,114.9[18.1];P = 0.69)。在治疗期间健康相关生活质量得以维持,各治疗组在第25周时FACT-P总分平均值(标准差)或子量表之间无统计学显著差异(FACT-P总分:ADT联合AAP组,122.3[20.4];单独使用APA组,119.5[16.4];AAP联合APA组,119.9[20.3])。与ADT联合AAP组相比,单独使用APA组和AAP联合APA组在HRQOL方面未出现有意义的改善,但在情绪健康评分恶化时间方面除外,单独使用APA组更有利(参照组:ADT联合AAP组;单独使用APA组:风险比,0.37[0.15 - 0.85];P = 0.02;ADT联合AAP组:风险比,0.56[0.26 - 1.19];P = 0.13)。局限性包括随访期短以及缺乏其他问卷来捕捉不同治疗之间的差异。
在这项针对晚期CSPC患者的ADT联合AAP、单独使用APA或APA联合AAP的随机临床试验的预先指定的二次分析中,单独使用APA或APA联合AAP治疗与ADT联合AAP治疗相比,HRQOL在统计学上无差异。需要开展更大规模、随访期更长且问卷更具特异性的研究,以进一步评估这些治疗策略对HRQOL的影响。
ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT02867020。