Suppr超能文献

使用辅助技术评估神经肌肉疾病患者的远端运动功能。

Use of assistive technology to assess distal motor function in subjects with neuromuscular disease.

作者信息

Vincent-Genod Dominique, Roche Sylvain, Barrière Aurélie, de Lattre Capucine, Tinat Marie, Venema Eelke, Lagrange Emmeline, Gomes Lisboa de Souza Adriana, Thomann Guillaume, Coton Justine, Gautheron Vincent, Féasson Léonard, Rippert Pascal, Vuillerot Carole

机构信息

Centre Référent Maladies Rares Neuromusculaires, Service de Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation Pédiatrique des Hospices Civils de Lyon - Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant, Bron, France.

Université Jean Monnet Saint-Etienne, Lyon 1, Université Savoie Mont-Blanc, Laboratoire Interuniversitaire de Biologie de la Motricité, Saint-Étienne, France.

出版信息

PLOS Digit Health. 2025 Jan 13;4(1):e0000534. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000534. eCollection 2025 Jan.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Among the 32 items of the Motor Function Measure scale, 3 concern the assessment of hand function on a paper-based support. Their characteristics make it possible to envisage the use of a tablet instead of the original paper-based support for their completion. This would then make it possible to automate the score to reduce intra- and inter-individual variability. The main objective of the present study was to validate the digital completion of items 18, 19, and 22 by measuring the agreement of the scores obtained using a digital tablet with those obtained using the original paper-based support in children and adults with various neuromuscular diseases (NMD). The secondary objective is to calibrate an algorithm for the automatic items scoring.

DESIGN

Prospective, multicentre, non-interventional study.

METHODS

Ninety-eight subjects aged 5 to 60 years with a confirmed NMD completed MFM items 18, 19, and 22 both on a paper support and a digital tablet.

RESULTS

The median age of included subjects was 16.2 years. Agreement between scores as assessed using the weighted Kappa coefficient was almost perfect for the scores of items 18 and 22 (K = 0.93, and 0.95, respectively) and substantial for item 19 (K = 0.70). In all cases of disagreement, the difference was of 1 point. The most frequent disagreement concerned item 19; mainly in the direction of a scoring of 1 point less on the tablet. An automatic analysis algorithm was tested on 82 recordings to suggest improvements.

CONCLUSION

The switch from original paper-based support to the tablet results in minimal and acceptable differences, and maintains a valid and reproducible measure of the 3 items. The developed algorithm for automatic scoring appears feasible with the perspective to include them in a digital application that will make it easier to monitor patients.

摘要

未标注

在运动功能测量量表的32个项目中,有3个涉及在纸质载体上对手功能的评估。其特点使得可以设想使用平板电脑替代原始的纸质载体来完成这些评估。这样就有可能实现评分自动化,以减少个体内和个体间的变异性。本研究的主要目的是通过测量使用数字平板电脑获得的分数与使用原始纸质载体在患有各种神经肌肉疾病(NMD)的儿童和成人中获得的分数之间的一致性,来验证项目18、19和22的数字填写方式。次要目的是校准自动项目评分算法。

设计

前瞻性、多中心、非干预性研究。

方法

98名年龄在5至60岁之间确诊为NMD的受试者在纸质载体和数字平板电脑上都完成了MFM项目18、19和22。

结果

纳入受试者的中位年龄为16.2岁。使用加权Kappa系数评估的分数之间的一致性对于项目18和22的分数几乎是完美的(分别为K = 0.93和0.95),对于项目19是实质性的(K = 0.70)。在所有不一致的情况下,差异为1分。最常见的不一致涉及项目19;主要是在平板电脑上少评1分的方向。对82份记录测试了一种自动分析算法以提出改进建议。

结论

从原始纸质载体转换到平板电脑导致的差异最小且可接受,并保持了这3个项目的有效和可重复测量。所开发的自动评分算法似乎可行,有望将其纳入数字应用程序中,以便更轻松地监测患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/087b/11729976/f1fa0d133e8a/pdig.0000534.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验