Dewolfe A S, Rausch M A, Fedirka P J
J Commun Disord. 1985 Feb;18(1):49-58. doi: 10.1016/0021-9924(85)90013-9.
The capacity of a word-ordering task to differentiate aphasic and schizophrenic patients was assessed. Cards containing words from 10 types of sentences were given to the patients. Each sentence was presented individually with the words in jumbled order and patients were asked to reorder them to produce a gramatically correct sentence. Process and reactive schizophrenics were differentiated from aphasic patients using the dual criteria of more than three incorrect sentences or an average of more than 90 sec per sentence as indicative of aphasia. These criteria were initially tested on a group of aphasics matched with the schizophrenics on age and education and cross-validated using a second more representative sample (unmatched) of aphasics. Both comparisons showed no errors of classification. Further analyses indicated no need for separate norms or classification criteria related to the sex, age, or educational level of the patients.
评估了词序任务区分失语症患者和精神分裂症患者的能力。向患者提供包含10种类型句子的单词的卡片。每个句子单独呈现，单词顺序混乱，要求患者重新排序以生成语法正确的句子。使用超过三个错误句子或平均每个句子超过90秒的双重标准，将过程性和反应性精神分裂症患者与失语症患者区分开来，以此作为失语症的指标。这些标准最初在一组年龄和教育程度与精神分裂症患者相匹配的失语症患者中进行测试，并使用第二个更具代表性的（不匹配的）失语症患者样本进行交叉验证。两项比较均未显示分类错误。进一步分析表明，无需针对患者的性别、年龄或教育水平制定单独的规范或分类标准。
