• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索加纳育龄妇女的烹饪燃料选择:基于统计力学视角的社会经济分析。

Exploring cooking fuel choices among Ghanaian women of reproductive age: A socio-economic analysis from a statistical mechanics perspective.

作者信息

Ansah Richard Kwame, Boadi Richard Kena, Obeng-Denteh William, Asosega Killian Asampana, Tawiah Kassim

机构信息

Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Energy and Natural Resources, Sunyani, Ghana.

Department of Mathematics, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Jan 14;20(1):e0317004. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317004. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0317004
PMID:39808626
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11731752/
Abstract

Access to clean and efficient cooking fuel is crucial for promoting good health, safeguarding the environment, and driving economic growth. Despite efforts to promote the adoption of cleaner alternatives, traditional solid fuels such as charcoal and firewood remain prevalent in Ghana. In this study, we utilized a statistical mechanical model as a framework to explore the statistical relationship between socio-economic factors such as educational attainment, wealth status, place of residence, and cooking fuel choices. We analysed data from the Ghana Malaria Indicator Survey (GMIS) conducted in 2019, involving a total of 2,942 women of reproductive age. The findings revealed that 13.77% of participants preferred using LPG fuels for cooking, while 86.23% preferred non-LPG fuels for their cooking needs. The data indicated that among LPG users, 96.54% are educated women of reproductive age, and 3.46% are non-educated women of reproductive age. Among these, 95.31% are non-poor, and 4.69% are poor. Additionally, 21.73% reside in rural areas, while 78.27% live in urban areas. The data also showed that among non-LPG fuel users, 68.70% are educated women of reproductive age, and 31.30% are non-educated women of reproductive age. Among this group, 16.04% are non-poor, and 83.96% are poor. Furthermore, 67.24% reside in rural areas, and 32.76% live in urban areas. Our findings showed that in the absence of social interaction, a woman's wealth status has a relationship to her choice of fuel for cooking. Additionally, women of reproductive age in rural areas with some education demonstrated a significant private incentive (40.12%) to use LPG, implying a positive correlation between education and the use of LPG for cooking. However, when social interactions are considered, factors such as education, wealth status, and place of residence have significant relationships with a woman's decision about fuel choice. The interaction strength among women of reproductive age in urban areas with some education shows a negative estimate (-4.06%), suggesting that there is no significant imitative effect. The study further suggests that urban women of reproductive age who are poor exert a greater influence on their urban counterparts who are not poor when social interaction is incorporated. Women of reproductive age in rural areas with some form of education exert a greater influence on women of reproductive age in rural areas with no form of education. We recommend that the government of Ghana and its stakeholders focus on leveraging the influence of urban poor women and educated rural women through community-led programs and educational campaigns. Financial support mechanisms like microfinance and subsidies, alongside reliable LPG infrastructure, can make access easier for these target groups. Tailored communication strategies, peer-to-peer learning, and collaboration with local institutions are crucial for spreading awareness and encouraging the adoption of LPG.

摘要

获得清洁高效的烹饪燃料对于促进健康、保护环境和推动经济增长至关重要。尽管一直在努力推广使用更清洁的替代燃料,但在加纳,木炭和柴火等传统固体燃料仍然很普遍。在本研究中,我们使用统计力学模型作为框架,来探索诸如教育程度、财富状况、居住地点等社会经济因素与烹饪燃料选择之间的统计关系。我们分析了2019年进行的加纳疟疾指标调查(GMIS)的数据,该调查共涉及2942名育龄妇女。研究结果显示,13.77%的参与者更喜欢使用液化石油气燃料做饭,而86.23%的参与者因烹饪需求更喜欢非液化石油气燃料。数据表明,在使用液化石油气的用户中,96.54%是育龄受过教育的妇女,3.46%是育龄未受过教育的妇女。其中,95.31%是非贫困人口,4.69%是贫困人口。此外,21.73%居住在农村地区,78.27%居住在城市地区。数据还显示,在非液化石油气燃料用户中,68.70%是育龄受过教育的妇女,31.30%是育龄未受过教育的妇女。在这一组中,16.04%是非贫困人口,83.96%是贫困人口。此外,67.24%居住在农村地区,32.76%居住在城市地区。我们的研究结果表明,在缺乏社会互动的情况下,女性的财富状况与其烹饪燃料的选择有关。此外,农村地区受过一定教育的育龄妇女有显著的个人动机(40.12%)使用液化石油气,这意味着教育与使用液化石油气做饭之间存在正相关。然而,当考虑社会互动时,教育、财富状况和居住地点等因素与女性的燃料选择决定有显著关系。城市地区受过一定教育的育龄妇女之间的互动强度显示出负面估计(-4.06%),这表明没有显著的模仿效应。该研究进一步表明,纳入社会互动因素后,城市贫困育龄妇女对非贫困的城市同龄人的影响更大。农村地区受过某种形式教育的育龄妇女对未受过任何形式教育的农村地区育龄妇女的影响更大。我们建议加纳政府及其利益相关者通过社区主导的项目和教育活动,重点利用城市贫困妇女和受过教育的农村妇女的影响力。小额融资和补贴等财政支持机制,以及可靠的液化石油气基础设施,可以使这些目标群体更容易获得。量身定制的沟通策略、 peer-to-peer学习以及与当地机构的合作对于提高认识和鼓励采用液化石油气至关重要。 (注:“peer-to-peer”直译为“对等的、点对点的”,这里结合语境可理解为“同龄人之间的、相互学习的”,但按照要求未添加解释,直接保留英文)

相似文献

1
Exploring cooking fuel choices among Ghanaian women of reproductive age: A socio-economic analysis from a statistical mechanics perspective.探索加纳育龄妇女的烹饪燃料选择:基于统计力学视角的社会经济分析。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 14;20(1):e0317004. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317004. eCollection 2025.
2
Household Determinants of Liquified Petroleum Gas (LPG) as a Cooking Fuel in South West Cameroon.喀麦隆西南部家庭将液化石油气用作烹饪燃料的决定因素
Ecohealth. 2018 Dec;15(4):729-743. doi: 10.1007/s10393-018-1367-9. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
3
The 2023 Latin America report of the Countdown on health and climate change: the imperative for health-centred climate-resilient development.《2023年健康与气候变化倒计时拉丁美洲报告:以健康为中心的气候适应型发展的必要性》
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Apr 23;33:100746. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100746. eCollection 2024 May.
4
Liquified Petroleum Gas (LPG) Supply and Demand for Cooking in Northern Ghana.加纳北部烹饪用液化石油气(LPG)的供需情况
Ecohealth. 2018 Dec;15(4):716-728. doi: 10.1007/s10393-018-1351-4. Epub 2018 Aug 14.
5
Drivers of the Adoption and Exclusive Use of Clean Fuel for Cooking in Sub-Saharan Africa: Learnings and Policy Considerations from Cameroon.撒哈拉以南非洲地区烹饪燃料采用和专用清洁燃料的驱动因素:来自喀麦隆的经验教训和政策考虑。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 13;17(16):5874. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165874.
6
Adoption and sustained use of cleaner cooking fuels in rural India: a case control study protocol to understand household, network, and organizational drivers.印度农村地区清洁烹饪燃料的采用与持续使用:一项了解家庭、网络及组织驱动因素的病例对照研究方案
Arch Public Health. 2017 Dec 14;75:70. doi: 10.1186/s13690-017-0244-2. eCollection 2017.
7
Indoor Air Pollution and Health in Ghana: Self-Reported Exposure to Unprocessed Solid Fuel Smoke.加纳的室内空气污染与健康:自我报告的未加工固体燃料烟雾暴露情况。
Ecohealth. 2015 Jun;12(2):227-43. doi: 10.1007/s10393-013-0883-x. Epub 2013 Oct 18.
8
Using photovoice methods as a community-based participatory research tool to advance uptake of clean cooking and improve health: The LPG adoption in Cameroon evaluation studies.运用影像方法作为一种基于社区的参与式研究工具来推动清洁烹饪的采用和改善健康:在喀麦隆的液化石油气采用评估研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 May;228:30-40. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.02.044. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
9
Determinants of Cookstoves and Fuel Choice Among Rural Households in India.印度农村家庭炉具和燃料选择的决定因素。
Ecohealth. 2019 Mar;16(1):21-60. doi: 10.1007/s10393-018-1389-3. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
10
The Gendered Nature of Liquefied Petroleum Gas Stove Adoption and Use in Rural India.印度农村地区采用和使用液化石油气炉灶的性别差异
J Dev Stud. 2020;56(7):1309-1329. doi: 10.1080/00220388.2019.1657571. Epub 2019 Sep 12.

本文引用的文献

1
The relationship between anaemia and the use of treated bed nets among pregnant and non-pregnant women in Ghana.加纳孕妇和非孕妇贫血与使用经过处理的蚊帐之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2024 May 2;19(5):e0300431. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300431. eCollection 2024.
2
Gender inequalities and household fuel choice in India.印度的性别不平等与家庭燃料选择
J Clean Prod. 2020 Aug 20;265:121487. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121487.
3
The Role of Education and Attitudes in Cooking Fuel Choice: Evidence from two states in India.教育与态度在烹饪燃料选择中的作用:来自印度两个邦的证据。
Energy Sustain Dev. 2020 Feb;54:36-50. doi: 10.1016/j.esd.2019.09.003. Epub 2019 Nov 23.
4
The Gendered Nature of Liquefied Petroleum Gas Stove Adoption and Use in Rural India.印度农村地区采用和使用液化石油气炉灶的性别差异
J Dev Stud. 2020;56(7):1309-1329. doi: 10.1080/00220388.2019.1657571. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
5
Ghana's Rural Liquefied Petroleum Gas Program Scale Up: A case study.加纳农村液化石油气项目的扩大:一个案例研究。
Energy Sustain Dev. 2018 Oct;46:94-102. doi: 10.1016/j.esd.2018.06.010. Epub 2018 Jul 7.
6
Household fuel use and adverse pregnancy outcomes in a Ghanaian cohort study.家庭燃料使用与加纳队列研究中的不良妊娠结局
Reprod Health. 2020 Feb 22;17(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12978-020-0878-3.
7
Household Determinants of Liquified Petroleum Gas (LPG) as a Cooking Fuel in South West Cameroon.喀麦隆西南部家庭将液化石油气用作烹饪燃料的决定因素
Ecohealth. 2018 Dec;15(4):729-743. doi: 10.1007/s10393-018-1367-9. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
8
Cooking Fuels in Lagos, Nigeria: Factors Associated with Household Choice of Kerosene or Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG).尼日利亚拉各斯的烹饪燃料:与家庭选择煤油或液化石油气(LPG)相关的因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Mar 31;15(4):641. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15040641.
9
The chemical composition of ultrafine particles and associated biological effects at an alpine town impacted by wood burning.山区城镇烧柴对超细颗粒的化学组成和相关生物效应的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Jun 1;587-588:223-231. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.125. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
10
Clean fuels for resource-poor settings: A systematic review of barriers and enablers to adoption and sustained use.资源匮乏地区的清洁燃料:对采用和持续使用的障碍及促进因素的系统评价
Environ Res. 2016 Apr;146:218-34. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2016.01.002. Epub 2016 Jan 13.