Suppr超能文献

医疗保险优势成本计划参保人中的网络外医疗服务利用情况及计划选择

Out-Of-Network Utilization and Plan Selection Among Medicare Advantage Cost Plan Enrollees.

作者信息

McCormack Grace, Trish Erin

机构信息

Schaeffer Center for Health Policy & Economics, Price School of Public Policy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr;60 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):e14438. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14438. Epub 2025 Jan 14.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To understand how Medicare Advantage (MA) networks impact utilization patterns and plan choices, using the 2019 discontinuation of MA 1876 Cost plans as a natural experiment.

STUDY SETTING AND DESIGN

We study 1876 Cost plans, MA plans for which out-of-network care is covered through traditional Medicare (TM) and many of which CMS discontinued in 2019. We characterize the proportion of Cost plan enrollees who utilized out-of-network care in 2018 from different types of medical specialties. We then study how enrollees in discontinued plans selected into new plans in 2019. We use regression analysis to characterize whether higher risk enrollees selected into TM at higher rates.

DATA SOURCES AND ANALYTIC SAMPLE

We identify discontinued plans using public MA plan data. We employ administrative Medicare enrollment and TM claims data to identify 2018 enrollees of discontinued plans, their 2018 out-of-network utilization, and their subsequent 2019 enrollment decisions.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Among Cost plan enrollees, 69% utilized non-emergency room related care out of network in 2018. Out-of-network utilization was distributed across several types of specialties: 43% of Cost plan enrollees had at least one out-of-network claim with a primary care physician and over 20% had a claim with a medical specialist, surgical specialist, or nurse practitioner. We find evidence of adverse selection among enrollees of discontinued Cost plans in 2019. Conditional on one's 2018 Cost plan and county of residence, a standard deviation increase in risk score was on average associated with a 26.35% (95% CI, 25.57%-27.12%) increased likelihood of enrolling in TM.

CONCLUSION

The high rate of out-of-network utilization suggests that MA enrollees value access to care outside of standard MA networks. Subsequent selection patterns indicate that preferences for broader networks and subsequent enrollment in TM is highest among higher risk enrollees, suggesting limited networks may induce extensive margin selection.

摘要

目的

以2019年MA 1876成本计划的终止作为一项自然实验,了解医疗保险优势(MA)网络如何影响医疗服务利用模式和计划选择。

研究背景与设计

我们研究1876成本计划,即那些网络外医疗服务通过传统医疗保险(TM)覆盖的MA计划,其中许多计划在2019年被医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)终止。我们描述了2018年不同医学专科的成本计划参保者中使用网络外医疗服务的比例。然后,我们研究了2019年已终止计划的参保者如何选择新计划。我们使用回归分析来描述高风险参保者是否以更高的比例选择加入TM。

数据来源与分析样本

我们利用公开的MA计划数据识别已终止的计划。我们使用医疗保险行政参保数据和TM理赔数据来识别2018年已终止计划的参保者、他们2018年的网络外医疗服务利用情况以及他们随后在2019年的参保决策。

主要发现

在成本计划成本计划参保者中,69%在2018年使用了网络外的非急诊室相关医疗服务。网络外医疗服务利用分布在多种专科类型中:43%的成本计划参保者至少有一次与初级保健医生的网络外理赔,超过20%的参保者有与医学专科医生、外科专科医生或执业护士的理赔。我们发现2019年已终止成本计划的参保者中存在逆向选择的证据。以一个人2018年的成本计划和居住县为条件,风险评分每增加一个标准差,加入TM的可能性平均增加26.35%(95%置信区间,25.57%-27.12%)。

结论

网络外医疗服务利用率高表明MA参保者重视获得标准MA网络之外的医疗服务。后续的选择模式表明,高风险参保者中对更广泛网络的偏好以及随后加入TM的比例最高,这表明有限的网络可能会引发广泛的边际选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0d9/12047686/67130af1fa6b/HESR-60-0-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验