• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

正常和故障条件下并网风力发电机的PI与模糊逻辑控制器的对比分析

Comparative analysis of PI and fuzzy logic controller for grid connected wind turbine under normal and fault conditions.

作者信息

Bahgat Mohamed, Ezzat Mohamed, Attia Mahmoud A, Mekhamer S F, Elbehairy Nourhan M

机构信息

Electrical Power and Machines Department, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.

Electrical Engineering Department, Future University, New Cairo, Egypt.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 14;15(1):1954. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-85073-w.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-85073-w
PMID:39809924
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11733149/
Abstract

This research is dedicated to improving the control system of wind turbines (WT) to ensure optimal efficiency and rapid responsiveness. To achieve this, the fuzzy logic control (FLC) method is implemented to control the converter in the rotor side (RSC) of a doubly fed induction generator (DFIG) and its performance is compared with an optimized proportional integral (PI) controller. The study demonstrated an enhancement in the performance of the DFIG through the utilization of the proposed FLC, effectively overcoming limitations and deficiencies observed in the conventional controllers, this approach significantly improved the performance of the wind turbine. Additionally, the selected membership functions were found to be highly compatible with the unique characteristics of wind energy. The optimization process is implemented for the controllers of both the grid side converter (GSC) and RSC. Through simulated analyses conducted using MATLAB/Simulink software, comprehensive assessments are carried out. The robustness of the FLC is evaluated compared to the optimized controllers across various wind profiles and challenging fault conditions. The results demonstrate satisfactory performance of the FLC in terms of steady-state time, stability, and precision under diverse wind speed profiles. The FLC achieves a significantly better settling time than the enhanced PI, improving by approximately 14-70% under normal conditions and 40-70% under various fault conditions. Additionally, the FLC outperforms the enhanced PI in fault conditions by reducing peak-to-peak oscillations by about 30-65%. It also delivers a smaller steady-state error, with improvements of around 2-4% under both normal conditions and most fault scenarios.

摘要

本研究致力于改进风力涡轮机(WT)的控制系统,以确保最佳效率和快速响应能力。为此,采用模糊逻辑控制(FLC)方法来控制双馈感应发电机(DFIG)转子侧(RSC)的变流器,并将其性能与优化的比例积分(PI)控制器进行比较。研究表明,通过使用所提出的FLC,DFIG的性能得到了提升,有效克服了传统控制器中观察到的局限性和不足,这种方法显著提高了风力涡轮机的性能。此外,发现所选的隶属函数与风能的独特特性高度兼容。对电网侧变流器(GSC)和RSC的控制器都进行了优化过程。通过使用MATLAB/Simulink软件进行的模拟分析,进行了全面评估。与优化后的控制器相比,在各种风况和具有挑战性的故障条件下评估了FLC的鲁棒性。结果表明,在不同风速剖面下,FLC在稳态时间、稳定性和精度方面具有令人满意的性能。FLC的建立时间比增强型PI明显更好,在正常条件下提高了约14 - 70%,在各种故障条件下提高了40 - 70%。此外,在故障条件下,FLC通过将峰峰值振荡降低约30 - 65%,表现优于增强型PI。它还具有更小的稳态误差,在正常条件和大多数故障情况下都有大约2 - 4%的改善。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a21c/11733149/feade1f2f29c/41598_2024_85073_Fig17_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a21c/11733149/976edfe4a626/41598_2024_85073_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a21c/11733149/b044e8f4b4b2/41598_2024_85073_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a21c/11733149/d3eac824dc3c/41598_2024_85073_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a21c/11733149/0a055584f57e/41598_2024_85073_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a21c/11733149/a47f2f52cd32/41598_2024_85073_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a21c/11733149/8158648b0d7b/41598_2024_85073_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a21c/11733149/d5911250c5ef/41598_2024_85073_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a21c/11733149/dd28af5e473b/41598_2024_85073_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a21c/11733149/ef9260243128/41598_2024_85073_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a21c/11733149/74aaa8f9de1d/41598_2024_85073_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a21c/11733149/1276f54e672c/41598_2024_85073_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a21c/11733149/d43be1d2ee41/41598_2024_85073_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a21c/11733149/5873c1acb7de/41598_2024_85073_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a21c/11733149/ad281dd0c1d9/41598_2024_85073_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a21c/11733149/0acde0c79ccf/41598_2024_85073_Fig15_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a21c/11733149/a7f7d6f20824/41598_2024_85073_Fig16_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a21c/11733149/feade1f2f29c/41598_2024_85073_Fig17_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a21c/11733149/976edfe4a626/41598_2024_85073_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a21c/11733149/b044e8f4b4b2/41598_2024_85073_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a21c/11733149/d3eac824dc3c/41598_2024_85073_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a21c/11733149/0a055584f57e/41598_2024_85073_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a21c/11733149/a47f2f52cd32/41598_2024_85073_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a21c/11733149/8158648b0d7b/41598_2024_85073_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a21c/11733149/d5911250c5ef/41598_2024_85073_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a21c/11733149/dd28af5e473b/41598_2024_85073_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a21c/11733149/ef9260243128/41598_2024_85073_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a21c/11733149/74aaa8f9de1d/41598_2024_85073_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a21c/11733149/1276f54e672c/41598_2024_85073_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a21c/11733149/d43be1d2ee41/41598_2024_85073_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a21c/11733149/5873c1acb7de/41598_2024_85073_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a21c/11733149/ad281dd0c1d9/41598_2024_85073_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a21c/11733149/0acde0c79ccf/41598_2024_85073_Fig15_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a21c/11733149/a7f7d6f20824/41598_2024_85073_Fig16_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a21c/11733149/feade1f2f29c/41598_2024_85073_Fig17_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative analysis of PI and fuzzy logic controller for grid connected wind turbine under normal and fault conditions.正常和故障条件下并网风力发电机的PI与模糊逻辑控制器的对比分析
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 14;15(1):1954. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-85073-w.
2
Validation of energy valley optimization for adaptive fuzzy logic controller of DFIG-based wind turbines.基于双馈感应发电机的风力发电机组自适应模糊逻辑控制器能量谷优化的验证
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 3;15(1):711. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-82382-y.
3
Artificial intelligent fuzzy control and LAPO algorithm for enhancement LVRT and power quality of grid connected PV/wind hybrid systems.用于增强并网光伏/风力混合系统低电压穿越能力和电能质量的人工智能模糊控制与LAPO算法
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 16;14(1):30475. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-78384-5.
4
Optimal hybrid type-3 fuzzy controller for horizontal axis wind turbines: Comparative study.水平轴风力发电机的最优混合3型模糊控制器:对比研究
ISA Trans. 2025 Jun;161:200-215. doi: 10.1016/j.isatra.2025.03.025. Epub 2025 Apr 3.
5
Power regulation of variable speed multi rotor wind systems using fuzzy cascaded control.基于模糊级联控制的变速多转子风力系统功率调节
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 16;14(1):16415. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67194-4.
6
A new approach for improving dynamic fault ride through capability of gridctied based wind turbines.一种提高基于并网的风力发电机组动态故障穿越能力的新方法。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 20;15(1):6144. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-89396-0.
7
SSO optimized FOFPID regulator design for performance enhancement of doubly fed induction generator based wind turbine system.用于增强双馈感应发电机风力发电系统性能的基于SSO优化的FOFPID调节器设计。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 16;14(1):28305. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-76457-z.
8
Differential Evolution Based IDWNN Controller for Fault Ride-Through of Grid-Connected Doubly Fed Induction Wind Generators.基于差分进化的并网双馈感应风力发电机故障穿越IDWNN控制器
ScientificWorldJournal. 2015;2015:746017. doi: 10.1155/2015/746017. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
9
Doubly fed induction generator wind turbines with fuzzy controller: a survey.带模糊控制器的双馈感应发电机风力涡轮机:综述
ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:252645. doi: 10.1155/2014/252645. Epub 2014 Jun 15.
10
An adaptive fuzzy logic control technique for LVRT enhancement of a grid-integrated DFIG-based wind energy conversion system.一种用于电网集成型双馈风力发电系统低电压穿越增强的自适应模糊逻辑控制技术。
ISA Trans. 2023 Jul;138:720-734. doi: 10.1016/j.isatra.2023.02.013. Epub 2023 Feb 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Robust direct voltage control of stand-alone DFIG wind systems using a fractional-order fuzzy logic approach.基于分数阶模糊逻辑方法的独立双馈感应发电机风力系统的鲁棒直接电压控制
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 6;15(1):28762. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-11910-1.
2
Enhancing power system stability by coordinating a wind turbine voltage regulator and lead-lag power system stabilizer using GOOSE optimization.通过使用GOOSE优化协调风力涡轮机电压调节器和超前-滞后电力系统稳定器来增强电力系统稳定性。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 30;15(1):15242. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-97419-z.