• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过使用GOOSE优化协调风力涡轮机电压调节器和超前-滞后电力系统稳定器来增强电力系统稳定性。

Enhancing power system stability by coordinating a wind turbine voltage regulator and lead-lag power system stabilizer using GOOSE optimization.

作者信息

Ibrahim Nader M A, El-Fergany Attia A, Hemade Bassam A

机构信息

Department of Electrical, Faculty of Technology and Education, Suez University, P.O. Box: 43221, Suez, Egypt.

Electrical Power and Machines Department, Zagazig University, Zagazig, 44519, Egypt.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 30;15(1):15242. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-97419-z.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-97419-z
PMID:40307253
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12043978/
Abstract

Integrating wind energy into power systems can negatively impact stability by reducing oscillation damping. Wind Turbine Voltage Regulators (WT VRs) are designed to manage reactive power and maintain voltage stability; however, they often do not coordinate effectively with Power System Stabilizers (PSS) from synchronous generators (SG). This study utilizes the GOOSE Optimization Algorithm (GOA) to optimize and coordinate the gains of the WT proportional-integral virtual regulator (WT PI-VR) and the SG proportional-integral-type lead-lag PSS (PI-type LL-PSS), to enhance power system stability and performance. The GOA performance compared with the Osprey Optimization Algorithm (OOA) and Particle Swarm Optimizer (PSO). The PI-type LL-PSS performance is compared with proportional-integral-derivative PID-PSS configurations, highlighting its robustness. Testing scenarios include step changes, voltage sags, and three-phase short-circuit faults, using metrics like integral time absolute error, settling time, and standard deviation for robustness evaluation. Statistical analysis shows several benefits from the proposed methodology: (i) A 48.85% stability improvement in coordinating WT PI-VR with PID-PSS using GOA versus OOA, (ii) A 24.40% performance boost with GOA over OOA using PI-type LL-PSS, (iii) A 14.4% enhancement when coordinating WT PI-VR with PI-type LL-PSS compared to PID-PSS, and (iv) A 34.23% performance increase using GOA instead of PSO for coordinating WT PI-VR with PI-type LL-PSS.

摘要

将风能整合到电力系统中可能会通过降低振荡阻尼对稳定性产生负面影响。风力涡轮机电压调节器(WT VRs)旨在管理无功功率并维持电压稳定性;然而,它们通常无法与同步发电机(SG)的电力系统稳定器(PSS)有效协调。本研究利用鹅群优化算法(GOA)来优化和协调WT比例积分虚拟调节器(WT PI-VR)和SG比例积分型超前滞后PSS(PI型LL-PSS)的增益,以提高电力系统的稳定性和性能。将GOA的性能与鱼鹰优化算法(OOA)和粒子群优化器(PSO)进行了比较。将PI型LL-PSS的性能与比例积分微分PID-PSS配置进行了比较,突出了其鲁棒性。测试场景包括阶跃变化、电压骤降和三相短路故障,使用积分时间绝对误差、调节时间和标准偏差等指标进行鲁棒性评估。统计分析表明,所提出的方法有几个好处:(i)与OOA相比,使用GOA协调WT PI-VR与PID-PSS时稳定性提高了48.85%,(ii)使用PI型LL-PSS时,GOA比OOA的性能提高了24.40%,(iii)与PID-PSS相比,协调WT PI-VR与PI型LL-PSS时性能提高了14.4%,以及(iv)使用GOA而不是PSO协调WT PI-VR与PI型LL-PSS时性能提高了34.23%。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/235c/12043978/01990791669b/41598_2025_97419_Fig15_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/235c/12043978/d2d162c2f4c2/41598_2025_97419_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/235c/12043978/d44096e683f7/41598_2025_97419_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/235c/12043978/1cf4e516b058/41598_2025_97419_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/235c/12043978/3d8adff0e10c/41598_2025_97419_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/235c/12043978/8f9286960cd2/41598_2025_97419_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/235c/12043978/682b5857b7f3/41598_2025_97419_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/235c/12043978/5154e32a3f09/41598_2025_97419_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/235c/12043978/8d31b47384f6/41598_2025_97419_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/235c/12043978/0dd12c79829d/41598_2025_97419_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/235c/12043978/2200ef94e984/41598_2025_97419_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/235c/12043978/7a44f5949ca4/41598_2025_97419_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/235c/12043978/e78425336d05/41598_2025_97419_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/235c/12043978/50dc5fa5007f/41598_2025_97419_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/235c/12043978/866481d954eb/41598_2025_97419_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/235c/12043978/01990791669b/41598_2025_97419_Fig15_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/235c/12043978/d2d162c2f4c2/41598_2025_97419_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/235c/12043978/d44096e683f7/41598_2025_97419_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/235c/12043978/1cf4e516b058/41598_2025_97419_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/235c/12043978/3d8adff0e10c/41598_2025_97419_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/235c/12043978/8f9286960cd2/41598_2025_97419_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/235c/12043978/682b5857b7f3/41598_2025_97419_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/235c/12043978/5154e32a3f09/41598_2025_97419_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/235c/12043978/8d31b47384f6/41598_2025_97419_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/235c/12043978/0dd12c79829d/41598_2025_97419_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/235c/12043978/2200ef94e984/41598_2025_97419_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/235c/12043978/7a44f5949ca4/41598_2025_97419_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/235c/12043978/e78425336d05/41598_2025_97419_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/235c/12043978/50dc5fa5007f/41598_2025_97419_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/235c/12043978/866481d954eb/41598_2025_97419_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/235c/12043978/01990791669b/41598_2025_97419_Fig15_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Enhancing power system stability by coordinating a wind turbine voltage regulator and lead-lag power system stabilizer using GOOSE optimization.通过使用GOOSE优化协调风力涡轮机电压调节器和超前-滞后电力系统稳定器来增强电力系统稳定性。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 30;15(1):15242. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-97419-z.
2
Maiden application of mountaineering team-based optimization algorithm optimized 1PD-PI controller for load frequency control in islanded microgrid with renewable energy sources.基于登山队的优化算法首次应用于优化含可再生能源的孤岛微电网负荷频率控制的1PD-PI控制器。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 1;14(1):22851. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-74051-x.
3
Optimal low voltage ride through of wind turbine doubly fed induction generator based on bonobo optimization algorithm.基于倭黑猩猩优化算法的风力涡轮机双馈感应发电机的最佳低电压穿越
Sci Rep. 2023 May 13;13(1):7778. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-34240-6.
4
Artificial intelligent fuzzy control and LAPO algorithm for enhancement LVRT and power quality of grid connected PV/wind hybrid systems.用于增强并网光伏/风力混合系统低电压穿越能力和电能质量的人工智能模糊控制与LAPO算法
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 16;14(1):30475. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-78384-5.
5
SSO optimized FOFPID regulator design for performance enhancement of doubly fed induction generator based wind turbine system.用于增强双馈感应发电机风力发电系统性能的基于SSO优化的FOFPID调节器设计。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 16;14(1):28305. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-76457-z.
6
Low-voltage ride-through capability in a DFIG using FO-PID and RCO techniques under symmetrical and asymmetrical faults.采用FO-PID和RCO技术的双馈感应发电机在对称和不对称故障下的低电压穿越能力
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 16;13(1):17534. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-44332-y.
7
Validation of energy valley optimization for adaptive fuzzy logic controller of DFIG-based wind turbines.基于双馈感应发电机的风力发电机组自适应模糊逻辑控制器能量谷优化的验证
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 3;15(1):711. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-82382-y.
8
Efficiency and robustness of type-2 fractional fuzzy PID design using salps swarm algorithm for a wind turbine control under uncertainty.基于樽海鞘群算法的2型分数阶模糊PID设计在不确定性风力涡轮机控制中的效率与鲁棒性
ISA Trans. 2022 Jun;125:72-84. doi: 10.1016/j.isatra.2021.06.016. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
9
Optimal hybrid type-3 fuzzy controller for horizontal axis wind turbines: Comparative study.水平轴风力发电机的最优混合3型模糊控制器:对比研究
ISA Trans. 2025 Jun;161:200-215. doi: 10.1016/j.isatra.2025.03.025. Epub 2025 Apr 3.
10
Particle swarm optimization algorithm-based PI inverter controller for a grid-connected PV system.基于粒子群优化算法的光伏系统并网 PI 逆变器控制器。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 23;15(12):e0243581. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243581. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative analysis of PI and fuzzy logic controller for grid connected wind turbine under normal and fault conditions.正常和故障条件下并网风力发电机的PI与模糊逻辑控制器的对比分析
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 14;15(1):1954. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-85073-w.
2
Designing of a wide-area power system stabilizer using an exponential distribution optimizer and fuzzy controller considering time delays.考虑时间延迟,使用指数分布优化器和模糊控制器设计广域电力系统稳定器。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 13;15(1):1773. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-85524-y.
3
Efficient DC motor speed control using a novel multi-stage FOPD(1 + PI) controller optimized by the Pelican optimization algorithm.
采用鹈鹕优化算法优化的新型多级FOPD(1 + PI)控制器实现高效直流电机速度控制。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 28;14(1):22442. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-73409-5.
4
Improved chaotic Bat algorithm for optimal coordinated tuning of power system stabilizers for multimachine power system.用于多机电力系统电力系统稳定器最优协调整定的改进混沌蝙蝠算法
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 2;14(1):15124. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65101-5.
5
Economical-environmental-technical optimal power flow solutions using a novel self-adaptive wild geese algorithm with stochastic wind and solar power.基于新型自适应大雁算法的含随机风电和光伏的经济-环境-技术最优潮流解决方案
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 19;14(1):4135. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-54510-1.