• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠疫情过渡时期澳大利亚两个城市城市流动性趋势的社会经济关联因素

Socioeconomic correlates of urban mobility trends in two Australian cities during transitional periods of the COVID-19 pandemic.

作者信息

Kollepara Pratyush, Dey Subhrasankha, Tomko Martin, Martino Erika, Bentley Rebecca, Tizzoni Michele, Geard Nicholas, Zachreson Cameron

机构信息

School of Computing and Information Systems, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

Department of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

R Soc Open Sci. 2025 Jan 15;12(1):241463. doi: 10.1098/rsos.241463. eCollection 2025 Jan.

DOI:10.1098/rsos.241463
PMID:39816732
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11732406/
Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, both government-mandated lockdowns and discretionary changes in behaviour combined to produce dramatic and abrupt changes to human mobility patterns. To understand the socioeconomic determinants of intervention compliance and discretionary behavioural responses to epidemic threats, we investigate whether changes in human mobility showed a systematic variation by socioeconomic status during two distinct periods of the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia. We analyse mobility data from two major urban centres and compare the trends during mandated stay-at-home policies and after the full relaxation of nonpharmaceutical interventions, which coincided with a large surge of COVID-19 cases. We analyse data aggregated from de-identified global positioning system trajectories, collated from providers of mobile phone applications and aggregated to small spatial regions. Our results demonstrate systematic decreases in mobility relative to the pre-pandemic baseline with the index of education and occupation, for both pandemic periods. On the other hand, the index of economic resources was not correlated with mobility changes. This result contrasts with observations from other national contexts, where reductions in mobility typically increased strongly with indicators of wealth. Our analysis suggests that economic support policies in place during the initial period of stay-at-home orders in Australia facilitated broad reductions in mobility across the economic spectrum.

摘要

在新冠疫情期间,政府强制实施的封锁措施以及人们自主做出的行为改变共同导致了人类流动模式的急剧和突然变化。为了了解干预措施依从性的社会经济决定因素以及对疫情威胁的自主行为反应,我们调查了在澳大利亚新冠疫情的两个不同阶段,人类流动的变化是否因社会经济地位而呈现出系统性差异。我们分析了来自两个主要城市中心的流动数据,并比较了强制居家政策期间以及非药物干预全面放宽后(这一时期恰逢新冠病例大幅激增)的趋势。我们分析了从去识别化的全球定位系统轨迹汇总而来的数据,这些轨迹由手机应用程序提供商整理,并汇总到小空间区域。我们的结果表明,在两个疫情阶段,相对于疫情前的基线水平,随着教育和职业指数的变化,流动性都出现了系统性下降。另一方面,经济资源指数与流动性变化没有关联。这一结果与其他国家的观察结果形成对比,在其他国家,流动性的下降通常与财富指标密切相关。我们的分析表明,澳大利亚在居家令初期实施的经济支持政策促进了各经济阶层流动性的广泛下降。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ba9/11732406/fe97634d5fe3/rsos.241463.f010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ba9/11732406/57f8d346cd9c/rsos.241463.f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ba9/11732406/d968fcf74476/rsos.241463.f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ba9/11732406/5d56980e52ef/rsos.241463.f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ba9/11732406/91a392c80ca5/rsos.241463.f004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ba9/11732406/c3f878e9d0ce/rsos.241463.f005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ba9/11732406/0730474a3a4b/rsos.241463.f006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ba9/11732406/a13066a84710/rsos.241463.f007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ba9/11732406/d4293c151803/rsos.241463.f008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ba9/11732406/ebc042ddf078/rsos.241463.f009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ba9/11732406/fe97634d5fe3/rsos.241463.f010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ba9/11732406/57f8d346cd9c/rsos.241463.f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ba9/11732406/d968fcf74476/rsos.241463.f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ba9/11732406/5d56980e52ef/rsos.241463.f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ba9/11732406/91a392c80ca5/rsos.241463.f004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ba9/11732406/c3f878e9d0ce/rsos.241463.f005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ba9/11732406/0730474a3a4b/rsos.241463.f006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ba9/11732406/a13066a84710/rsos.241463.f007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ba9/11732406/d4293c151803/rsos.241463.f008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ba9/11732406/ebc042ddf078/rsos.241463.f009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ba9/11732406/fe97634d5fe3/rsos.241463.f010.jpg

相似文献

1
Socioeconomic correlates of urban mobility trends in two Australian cities during transitional periods of the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情过渡时期澳大利亚两个城市城市流动性趋势的社会经济关联因素
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 Jan 15;12(1):241463. doi: 10.1098/rsos.241463. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Urban exodus? Understanding human mobility in Britain during the COVID-19 pandemic using Meta-Facebook data.城市人口外流?利用Meta-脸书数据了解新冠疫情期间英国的人口流动情况。
Popul Space Place. 2023 Jan;29(1):e2637. doi: 10.1002/psp.2637. Epub 2022 Dec 7.
3
Associations between changes in population mobility in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and socioeconomic factors at the city level in China and country level worldwide: a retrospective, observational study.应对 COVID-19 大流行期间人口流动变化与中国城市层面和全球国家层面社会经济因素的关联:一项回顾性观察研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2021 Jun;3(6):e349-e359. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00059-5.
4
City mobility patterns during the COVID-19 pandemic: analysis of a global natural experiment.新冠疫情期间的城市流动性模式:一项全球自然实验分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2024 Nov;9(11):e896-e906. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(24)00222-6.
5
Practical geospatial and sociodemographic predictors of human mobility.实用的地理空间和社会人口统计学预测人类流动性。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 28;11(1):15389. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94683-7.
6
The effect of population mobility on COVID-19 incidence in 314 Latin American cities: a longitudinal ecological study with mobile phone location data.人口流动对 314 个拉丁美洲城市 COVID-19 发病率的影响:基于手机定位数据的纵向生态学研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2021 Nov;3(11):e716-e722. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00174-6. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
7
Human mobility variations in response to restriction policies during the COVID-19 pandemic: An analysis from the Virus Watch community cohort in England, UK.人类在 COVID-19 大流行期间对限制政策的反应的流动性变化:来自英国 Virus Watch 社区队列的分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 14;10:999521. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.999521. eCollection 2022.
8
A global observational analysis to understand changes in air quality during exceptionally low anthropogenic emission conditions.一项旨在了解人为排放异常低的情况下空气质量变化的全球观测分析。
Environ Int. 2021 Dec;157:106818. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106818. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
9
Evaluating the reliability of mobility metrics from aggregated mobile phone data as proxies for SARS-CoV-2 transmission in the USA: a population-based study.评估聚合手机数据的移动性指标作为美国 SARS-CoV-2 传播替代指标的可靠性:一项基于人群的研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2022 Jan;4(1):e27-e36. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00214-4. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
10
Mobile Phone Network Data in the COVID-19 era: A systematic review of applications, socioeconomic factors affecting compliance to non-pharmaceutical interventions, privacy implications, and post-pandemic economic recovery strategies.新冠疫情时代的移动电话网络数据:对应用、影响非药物干预措施依从性的社会经济因素、隐私问题及疫情后经济复苏策略的系统综述
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 29;20(4):e0322520. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322520. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Mapping travel behavior changes during the COVID-19 lock-down: a socioeconomic analysis in Greece.绘制新冠疫情封锁期间的出行行为变化:希腊的社会经济分析
Eur Transp Res Rev. 2021;13(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12544-021-00481-7. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
2
The limits of human mobility traces to predict the spread of COVID-19: A transfer entropy approach.利用人类流动轨迹极限预测新冠病毒传播:一种转移熵方法
PNAS Nexus. 2023 Sep 14;2(10):pgad302. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad302. eCollection 2023 Oct.
3
Fine scale human mobility changes within 26 US cities in 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic were associated with distance and income.
2020年,美国26个城市内人类精细尺度的出行变化因应对新冠疫情而与距离和收入相关。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Jul 21;3(7):e0002151. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002151. eCollection 2023.
4
I know what you did last summer: a cross-sectional study of personal COVID-19 risk reduction strategies used by Victorian adults, December 2021-January 2022.我知道你们去年夏天干了什么:2021 年 12 月至 2022 年 1 月期间维多利亚州成年人使用的个人 COVID-19 降低风险策略的横断面研究。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2023 Jun;47(3):100068. doi: 10.1016/j.anzjph.2023.100068. Epub 2023 Jun 2.
5
The impact of COVID-19 on mobility choices in Switzerland.新冠疫情对瑞士出行选择的影响。
Transp Res Part A Policy Pract. 2023 Mar;169:103582. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2023.103582. Epub 2023 Jan 16.
6
Investigating the two-way relationship between mobility flows and COVID-19 cases.研究人口流动与新冠病例之间的双向关系。
Econ Model. 2023 Jan;118:106083. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2022.106083. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
7
Mobility was a significant determinant of reported COVID-19 incidence during the Omicron Surge in the most populous U.S. Counties.在人口最多的美国县,在奥密克戎疫情高峰期,流动性是报告的 COVID-19 发病率的一个重要决定因素。
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Aug 15;22(1):691. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07666-y.
8
Socio-economic disparities in activity-travel behavior adaptation during the COVID-19 pandemic in North Carolina.北卡罗来纳州在新冠疫情期间活动出行行为适应方面的社会经济差异。
Transp Policy (Oxf). 2022 Sep;125:70-78. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.05.012. Epub 2022 May 27.
9
Addressing the socioeconomic divide in computational modeling for infectious diseases.解决传染病计算建模中的社会经济鸿沟问题。
Nat Commun. 2022 May 24;13(1):2897. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30688-8.
10
Living in a pandemic: changes in mobility routines, social activity and adherence to COVID-19 protective measures.生活在大流行中:流动性常规、社会活动和遵守 COVID-19 保护措施的变化。
Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 27;11(1):24452. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-04139-1.