• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在人口最多的美国县,在奥密克戎疫情高峰期,流动性是报告的 COVID-19 发病率的一个重要决定因素。

Mobility was a significant determinant of reported COVID-19 incidence during the Omicron Surge in the most populous U.S. Counties.

机构信息

Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.

Eisner Health, Los Angeles, CA, 90015, USA.

出版信息

BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Aug 15;22(1):691. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07666-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12879-022-07666-y
PMID:35971063
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9376582/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Significant immune escape by the Omicron variant, along with the emergence of widespread worry fatigue, have called into question the robustness of the previously observed relation between population mobility and COVID-19 incidence.

METHODS

We employed principal component analysis to construct a one-dimensional summary indicator of six Google mobility categories. We related this mobility indicator to case incidence among 111 of the most populous U.S. counties during the Omicron surge from December 2021 through February 2022.

RESULTS

Reported COVID-19 incidence peaked earlier and declined more rapidly among those counties exhibiting more extensive decline in mobility between December 20 and January 3. Based upon a fixed-effects, longitudinal cohort model, we estimated that every 1% decline in mobility between December 20 and January 3 was associated with a 0.63% decline in peak incidence during the week ending January 17 (95% confidence interval, 0.40-0.86%). Based upon a cross-sectional analysis including mean household size and vaccination participation as covariates, we estimated that the same 1% decline in mobility was associated with a 0.36% decline in cumulative reported COVID-19 incidence from January 10 through February 28 (95% CI, 0.18-0.54%).

CONCLUSION

Omicron did not simply sweep through the U.S. population until it ran out of susceptible individuals to infect. To the contrary, a significant fraction managed to avoid infection by engaging in risk-mitigating behaviors. More broadly, the behavioral response to perceived risk should be viewed as an intrinsic component of the natural course of epidemics in humans.

摘要

背景

奥密克戎变体的显著免疫逃逸,以及广泛的担忧疲劳的出现,使得人们对先前观察到的人口流动与 COVID-19 发病率之间的关系的稳健性产生了质疑。

方法

我们采用主成分分析构建了一个由六个谷歌移动类别组成的一维综合指标。我们将这一流动指标与 2021 年 12 月至 2022 年 2 月奥密克戎激增期间美国 111 个人口最多的县的病例发病率相关联。

结果

报告的 COVID-19 发病率在移动性下降幅度较大的县中更早达到峰值,并在 12 月 20 日至 1 月 3 日之间更快下降。基于固定效应的纵向队列模型,我们估计,在 12 月 20 日至 1 月 3 日之间,每下降 1%的流动性与在 1 月 17 日结束的那一周发病率峰值下降 0.63%(95%置信区间,0.40-0.86%)有关。基于包括家庭平均规模和疫苗接种参与率作为协变量的横断面分析,我们估计,同样的 1%的流动性下降与 1 月 10 日至 2 月 28 日报告的 COVID-19 累计发病率下降 0.36%(95%CI,0.18-0.54%)有关。

结论

奥密克戎并不是简单地席卷美国人口,直到它感染了所有易感人群。相反,相当一部分人通过采取降低风险的行为来避免感染。更广泛地说,对感知风险的行为反应应被视为人类传染病自然过程的内在组成部分。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7e6/9377094/7a137f8acc5e/12879_2022_7666_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7e6/9377094/83391c5fb24f/12879_2022_7666_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7e6/9377094/64b76a278244/12879_2022_7666_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7e6/9377094/cdfcc5da2a62/12879_2022_7666_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7e6/9377094/ebabfac8b671/12879_2022_7666_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7e6/9377094/99f6f27b9297/12879_2022_7666_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7e6/9377094/7a137f8acc5e/12879_2022_7666_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7e6/9377094/83391c5fb24f/12879_2022_7666_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7e6/9377094/64b76a278244/12879_2022_7666_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7e6/9377094/cdfcc5da2a62/12879_2022_7666_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7e6/9377094/ebabfac8b671/12879_2022_7666_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7e6/9377094/99f6f27b9297/12879_2022_7666_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7e6/9377094/7a137f8acc5e/12879_2022_7666_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Mobility was a significant determinant of reported COVID-19 incidence during the Omicron Surge in the most populous U.S. Counties.在人口最多的美国县,在奥密克戎疫情高峰期,流动性是报告的 COVID-19 发病率的一个重要决定因素。
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Aug 15;22(1):691. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07666-y.
2
Trends in Disease Severity and Health Care Utilization During the Early Omicron Variant Period Compared with Previous SARS-CoV-2 High Transmission Periods - United States, December 2020-January 2022.疾病严重程度和医疗保健利用趋势在奥密克戎变异株早期与之前 SARS-CoV-2 高传播期相比-美国,2020 年 12 月至 2022 年 1 月。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022 Jan 28;71(4):146-152. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7104e4.
3
SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529 (Omicron) Variant Transmission Within Households - Four U.S. Jurisdictions, November 2021-February 2022.SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529 (Omicron) 变异株在美四个州家庭内传播:2021 年 11 月至 2022 年 2 月
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022 Mar 4;71(9):341-346. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7109e1.
4
Hospitalizations of Children and Adolescents with Laboratory-Confirmed COVID-19 - COVID-NET, 14 States, July 2021-January 2022.儿童和青少年因实验室确诊的 COVID-19 住院-COVID-NET,14 个州,2021 年 7 月-2022 年 1 月。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022 Feb 18;71(7):271-278. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7107e4.
5
COVID-19 Incidence and hospitalization during the delta surge were inversely related to vaccination coverage among the most populous U.S. Counties.在德尔塔毒株激增期间,美国人口最多的几个县的新冠病毒感染率和住院率与疫苗接种覆盖率呈负相关。
Health Policy Technol. 2022 Jun;11(2):100583. doi: 10.1016/j.hlpt.2021.100583. Epub 2021 Nov 30.
6
Association Between 3 Doses of mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine and Symptomatic Infection Caused by the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron and Delta Variants.mRNA COVID-19 疫苗 3 剂接种与 SARS-CoV-2 奥密克戎和德尔塔变异株引起的有症状感染之间的关联。
JAMA. 2022 Feb 15;327(7):639-651. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.0470.
7
Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes Among Adults Hospitalized with Laboratory-Confirmed SARS-CoV-2 Infection During Periods of B.1.617.2 (Delta) and B.1.1.529 (Omicron) Variant Predominance - One Hospital, California, July 15-September 23, 2021, and December 21, 2021-January 27, 2022.2021 年 7 月 15 日至 9 月 23 日和 2021 年 12 月 21 日至 2022 年 1 月 27 日期间,加利福尼亚州一家医院因实验室确诊的 SARS-CoV-2 感染住院的成年人的临床特征和结局,期间 B.1.617.2(德尔塔)和 B.1.1.529(奥密克戎)变异株占主导地位。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022 Feb 11;71(6):217-223. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7106e2.
8
Genomic Surveillance for SARS-CoV-2 Variants: Predominance of the Delta (B.1.617.2) and Omicron (B.1.1.529) Variants - United States, June 2021-January 2022.SARS-CoV-2 变体的基因组监测:Delta(B.1.617.2)和奥密克戎(B.1.1.529)变体占主导地位-美国,2021 年 6 月-2022 年 1 月。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022 Feb 11;71(6):206-211. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7106a4.
9
How has the emergence of the Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern influenced worry, perceived risk and behaviour in the UK? A series of cross-sectional surveys.奥密克戎(Omicron)关切变异株的出现如何影响了英国民众的担忧、感知风险和行为?一系列横断面调查。
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 29;12(8):e061203. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061203.
10
Hospitalization of Infants and Children Aged 0-4 Years with Laboratory-Confirmed COVID-19 - COVID-NET, 14 States, March 2020-February 2022.0-4 岁确诊感染 COVID-19 的婴幼儿住院情况-COVID-NET,14 个州,2020 年 3 月-2022 年 2 月。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022 Mar 18;71(11):429-436. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7111e2.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative spatial-temporal analysis of SARS-CoV-2 lineages B.1.1.33 and BQ.1.1 Omicron variant across pandemic phases.严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)谱系B.1.1.33和BQ.1.1奥密克戎变种在疫情各阶段的时空比较分析
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 25;15(1):10319. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-95140-5.
2
Socioeconomic correlates of urban mobility trends in two Australian cities during transitional periods of the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情过渡时期澳大利亚两个城市城市流动性趋势的社会经济关联因素
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 Jan 15;12(1):241463. doi: 10.1098/rsos.241463. eCollection 2025 Jan.
3
A tight fit of the SIR dynamic epidemic model to daily cases of COVID-19 reported during the 2021-2022 Omicron surge in New York City: A novel approach.

本文引用的文献

1
Geospatial Analysis of a COVID-19 Outbreak at the University of Wisconsin - Madison: Potential Role of a Cluster of Local Bars.威斯康星大学麦迪逊分校新冠疫情的地理空间分析:当地一批酒吧的潜在作用
Epidemiol Infect. 2022 Apr 5;150:1-31. doi: 10.1017/S0950268822000498.
2
Assessing the impact of mobility on the incidence of COVID-19 in Dublin City.评估流动性对都柏林市新冠病毒病发病率的影响。
Sustain Cities Soc. 2022 May;80:103770. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103770. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
3
Vaccines elicit highly conserved cellular immunity to SARS-CoV-2 Omicron.
将 SIR 动态传染病模型与 2021-2022 年在纽约市奥密克戎疫情期间报告的每日 COVID-19 病例进行紧密拟合:一种新方法。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2024 Oct;33(10):1877-1898. doi: 10.1177/09622802241277956.
4
The effect of mobility reductions on infection growth is quadratic in many cases.在许多情况下,流动性降低对感染增长的影响是二次方的。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 24;14(1):14475. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64230-1.
5
Enhancing the work engagement of frontline nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic: the mediating role of affective commitment and perceived organizational support.在新冠疫情期间提高一线护士的工作投入度:情感承诺和感知到的组织支持的中介作用
BMC Nurs. 2023 Dec 1;22(1):451. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01623-z.
6
Residential mobility predicts COVID-19 and seasonal flu vaccination behaviors in the United States.居住流动性可预测美国 COVID-19 和季节性流感疫苗接种行为。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 27;10:1064962. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1064962. eCollection 2022.
7
Changes in mobility amid the COVID-19 pandemic in Sapporo City, Japan: An investigation through the relationship between spatiotemporal population density and urban facilities.日本札幌市新冠疫情期间的出行变化:通过时空人口密度与城市设施之间的关系进行调查
Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2023 Jan;17:100744. doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2022.100744. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
8
Using unstable data from mobile phone applications to examine recent trajectories of retail centre recovery.利用来自手机应用程序的不稳定数据来研究零售中心复苏的近期轨迹。
Urban Inform. 2022;1(1):21. doi: 10.1007/s44212-022-00022-0. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
9
Concentric regulatory zones failed to halt surging COVID-19: Brooklyn 2020.同心调控区未能遏制新冠疫情的汹涌蔓延:2020 年布鲁克林。
Front Public Health. 2022 Dec 7;10:970363. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.970363. eCollection 2022.
疫苗引发针对 SARS-CoV-2 奥密克戎的高度保守的细胞免疫。
Nature. 2022 Mar;603(7901):493-496. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04465-y. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
4
SARS-CoV-2 Omicron-B.1.1.529 leads to widespread escape from neutralizing antibody responses.严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型奥密克戎变异株B.1.1.529可导致广泛的中和抗体反应逃逸。
Cell. 2022 Feb 3;185(3):467-484.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.12.046. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
5
Critical Role of the Subways in the Initial Spread of SARS-CoV-2 in New York City.地铁在 SARS-CoV-2 病毒在纽约市的初始传播中起关键作用。
Front Public Health. 2021 Dec 23;9:754767. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.754767. eCollection 2021.
6
Delay in the Effect of Restricting Community Mobility on the Spread of COVID-19 During the First Wave in the United States.美国第一波疫情期间社区流动限制对新冠病毒传播影响的延迟效应
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021 Nov 22;9(1):ofab586. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofab586. eCollection 2022 Jan.
7
Omicron's feeble attack on the lungs could make it less dangerous.奥密克戎对肺部的攻击较弱,这可能使其危险性降低。
Nature. 2022 Jan;601(7892):177. doi: 10.1038/d41586-022-00007-8.
8
Mind the "worry fatigue" amid Omicron scares.警惕奥密克戎恐慌下的“担忧疲劳”。
Brain Behav Immun. 2022 Mar;101:60-61. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2021.12.023. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
9
COVID-19 Incidence and hospitalization during the delta surge were inversely related to vaccination coverage among the most populous U.S. Counties.在德尔塔毒株激增期间,美国人口最多的几个县的新冠病毒感染率和住院率与疫苗接种覆盖率呈负相关。
Health Policy Technol. 2022 Jun;11(2):100583. doi: 10.1016/j.hlpt.2021.100583. Epub 2021 Nov 30.
10
Change of human mobility during COVID-19: A United States case study.**译文**:新冠疫情期间人类流动性的变化:美国案例研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 2;16(11):e0259031. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259031. eCollection 2021.