1 Department of Mental Health, University General Hospital of Malaga, Biomedical Research Institute of Malaga (IBIMA), Malaga, Spain.
2 University of Málaga, Andalucía Tech, Faculty of Psychology, Málaga, Spain.
Can J Psychiatry. 2018 Feb;63(2):129-144. doi: 10.1177/0706743717738491. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
This systematic review presents evidence regarding factors that may influence the patient's subjective experience of an episode of mechanical restraint, seclusion, or forced administration of medication.
Two authors searched CINAHL, PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and Psych-Info, considering published studies between 1 January 1992 and 1 February 2016. Based on the inclusion criteria and methodological quality, 34 studies were selected, reporting a total sample of 1,869 participants.
The results showed that the provision of information, contact and interaction with staff, and adequate communication with professionals are factors that influence the subjective experience of these measures. Humane treatment, respect, and staff support are also associated with a better experience, and debriefing is an important procedure/technique to reduce the emotional impact of these measures. Likewise, the quality of the working and physical environment and some individual and treatment variables were related to the experience of these measures. There are different results in relation to the most frequently associated experiences and, despite some data that indicate positive experiences, the evidence shows such experiences to be predominantly negative and frequently with adverse consequences. It seems that patients find forced medication and seclusion to be more tolerable than mechanical restraint and combined measures.
It appears that the role of the staff and the environmental conditions, which are potentially modifiable, affect the subjective experience of these measures. There was considerable heterogeneity among studies in terms of coercive measures experienced by participants and study designs.
本系统评价呈现了可能影响患者对机械约束、隔离或强制用药这一事件的主观体验的因素方面的证据。
两位作者检索了 CINAHL、PubMed、SCOPUS、Web of Science 和 Psych-Info,考虑了 1992 年 1 月 1 日至 2016 年 2 月 1 日期间发表的研究。基于纳入标准和方法学质量,选择了 34 项研究,报告了总计 1869 名参与者的样本。
结果表明,提供信息、与工作人员的接触和互动,以及与专业人员的充分沟通是影响这些措施的主观体验的因素。人道待遇、尊重和工作人员的支持也与更好的体验相关,而事后讨论是减少这些措施的情绪影响的重要程序/技术。同样,工作和物理环境的质量以及一些个体和治疗变量与这些措施的体验相关。与最常相关的体验有关的结果存在差异,尽管有一些数据表明积极的体验,但证据表明这些体验主要是负面的,并且经常产生不良后果。似乎患者发现强制用药和隔离比机械约束和联合措施更能忍受。
看来工作人员的角色和环境条件(具有潜在的可变性)影响了这些措施的主观体验。参与者经历的强制性措施和研究设计在研究之间存在相当大的异质性。