• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

支撑品牌热爱关系发展的审美评价:激活可能性估计元分析与多变量分析

Aesthetic evaluation underpinning brand love relationship development: an activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis and multivariate analysis.

作者信息

Watanuki Shinya

机构信息

Department of Marketing, Faculty of Commerce, University of Marketing and Distribution Sciences, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.

出版信息

Front Neurosci. 2025 Jan 3;18:1443578. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1443578. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fnins.2024.1443578
PMID:39830591
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11739102/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Brand love is a crucial construct in marketing strategies. Building brand love can generate stable profits for enterprises. Although the marketing literature points out that aesthetic factors contribute to establishing the relationship as a trigger, to what stage of the relationship do they influence the minds of consumers? The present study attempts to reveal the involvement of aesthetic experiences in brand love developmental dynamics.

METHODOLOGY

Using the activation likelihood estimation method, we address this issue by assessing overlapping brain regions between brand love at each stage and aesthetic experiences. We adopted three major meta-analytic decoding analysis modules to objectively interpret these brain regions, namely, Neurosynth, NeuroQuery, and the Behavioral Analysis plugin (BrainMap platform). Moreover, we performed a correspondence analysis to identify relationships of mental processes between aesthetic experiences and brand love in each developmental stage of brand love.

FINDINGS

Our results suggest that the same neural mechanism and mental processes may be underlaid between brand love and aesthetic experiences across all stages. Although reward- and emotion-related mental processes are commonly underlaid between brand love at the first-half stage and aesthetic experiences, exteroceptive and interoceptive signals may drive those mental processes between the early and migration stages of brand love, respectively, and aesthetic experiences. Overlapping regions of brand love at the stable stage and aesthetic experiences may be associated with semantic processing.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrate that several brain regions overlapped between brand love and aesthetic experiences across all the brand love developmental stages. Therefore, aesthetic experiences might be associated with the mental processes of brand love development through all the developmental stages. Our results suggest that aesthetic experiences are essential elements for developing brand-love relationships.

IMPLICATIONS

Our findings indicate that marketers should recognize that aesthetic experiences play a crucial role in building a bond between brands and consumers, not only when choosing brands. Thus, marketers need to design visual strategies from the view of nurturing brand-love relationships.

摘要

目标

品牌热爱是营销策略中的一个关键概念。建立品牌热爱能够为企业带来稳定利润。尽管营销文献指出审美因素有助于作为一种触发因素来建立这种关系,但它们会在关系的哪个阶段影响消费者的心理呢?本研究试图揭示审美体验在品牌热爱发展动态中的参与情况。

方法

我们使用激活可能性估计方法,通过评估品牌热爱各阶段与审美体验之间重叠的脑区来解决这个问题。我们采用了三个主要的元分析解码分析模块来客观解释这些脑区,即Neurosynth、NeuroQuery和行为分析插件(BrainMap平台)。此外,我们进行了对应分析,以确定在品牌热爱的每个发展阶段审美体验与品牌热爱之间心理过程的关系。

结果

我们的结果表明,在所有阶段,品牌热爱和审美体验之间可能存在相同的神经机制和心理过程。虽然与奖励和情感相关的心理过程通常存在于品牌热爱前半阶段与审美体验之间,但外感受和内感受信号可能分别在品牌热爱的早期和迁移阶段驱动这些心理过程以及审美体验。品牌热爱稳定阶段与审美体验的重叠区域可能与语义处理有关。

结论

我们证明了在品牌热爱的所有发展阶段,品牌热爱与审美体验之间存在几个重叠的脑区。因此,审美体验可能在品牌热爱发展的所有阶段都与心理过程相关。我们的结果表明,审美体验是发展品牌热爱关系的关键要素。

启示

我们的研究结果表明,营销人员应该认识到审美体验在建立品牌与消费者之间的联系中起着至关重要的作用,而不仅仅是在选择品牌时。因此,营销人员需要从培育品牌热爱关系的角度设计视觉策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dbf/11739102/6f8d0f7601b0/fnins-18-1443578-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dbf/11739102/0f51e4999c07/fnins-18-1443578-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dbf/11739102/25aa910af9e0/fnins-18-1443578-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dbf/11739102/65f9e012abd4/fnins-18-1443578-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dbf/11739102/b091baf7d202/fnins-18-1443578-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dbf/11739102/6f8d0f7601b0/fnins-18-1443578-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dbf/11739102/0f51e4999c07/fnins-18-1443578-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dbf/11739102/25aa910af9e0/fnins-18-1443578-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dbf/11739102/65f9e012abd4/fnins-18-1443578-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dbf/11739102/b091baf7d202/fnins-18-1443578-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dbf/11739102/6f8d0f7601b0/fnins-18-1443578-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Aesthetic evaluation underpinning brand love relationship development: an activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis and multivariate analysis.支撑品牌热爱关系发展的审美评价:激活可能性估计元分析与多变量分析
Front Neurosci. 2025 Jan 3;18:1443578. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1443578. eCollection 2024.
2
Neural mechanisms of brand love relationship dynamics: Is the development of brand love relationships the same as that of interpersonal romantic love relationships?品牌喜爱关系动态的神经机制:品牌喜爱关系的发展与人际浪漫爱情关系的发展相同吗?
Front Neurosci. 2022 Nov 10;16:984647. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.984647. eCollection 2022.
3
Neural substrates of brand equity: applying a quantitative meta-analytical method for neuroimage studies.品牌资产的神经基础:将定量元分析方法应用于神经影像研究。
Heliyon. 2022 Jun 10;8(6):e09702. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09702. eCollection 2022 Jun.
4
Neural Substrates of Brand Love: An Activation Likelihood Estimation Meta-Analysis of Functional Neuroimaging Studies.品牌热爱的神经基础:功能神经影像学研究的激活可能性估计元分析
Front Neurosci. 2020 Sep 25;14:534671. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.534671. eCollection 2020.
5
"Wow! It's Cool": How Brand Coolness Affects the Customer Psychological Well-Being Through Brand Love and Brand Engagement.“哇!太酷了”:品牌酷感如何通过品牌热爱和品牌参与影响顾客的心理健康。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 28;13:923870. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.923870. eCollection 2022.
6
Watershed Brain Regions for Characterizing Brand Equity-Related Mental Processes.用于表征品牌资产相关心理过程的分水岭脑区。
Brain Sci. 2021 Dec 8;11(12):1619. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11121619.
7
Consumer-Brand Relationships under the Marketing 3.0 Paradigm: A Literature Review.营销3.0范式下的消费者-品牌关系:文献综述
Front Psychol. 2017 Feb 22;8:252. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00252. eCollection 2017.
8
The Mediating Role of Brand Trust and Brand Love between Brand Experience and Loyalty: A Study on Smartphones in China.品牌信任与品牌爱在中国智能手机品牌体验与忠诚度之间的中介作用研究
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Jun 14;13(6):502. doi: 10.3390/bs13060502.
9
Expressive Brand Relationship, Brand Love, and Brand Loyalty for Tablet PCs: Building a Sustainable Brand.平板电脑的表达性品牌关系、品牌热爱与品牌忠诚度:打造可持续品牌
Front Psychol. 2020 Mar 6;11:231. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00231. eCollection 2020.
10
Identifying distinctive brain regions related to consumer choice behaviors on branded foods using activation likelihood estimation and machine learning.使用激活可能性估计和机器学习识别与品牌食品消费者选择行为相关的独特脑区。
Front Comput Neurosci. 2024 Jan 17;18:1310013. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2024.1310013. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Neural mechanisms of brand love relationship dynamics: Is the development of brand love relationships the same as that of interpersonal romantic love relationships?品牌喜爱关系动态的神经机制:品牌喜爱关系的发展与人际浪漫爱情关系的发展相同吗?
Front Neurosci. 2022 Nov 10;16:984647. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.984647. eCollection 2022.
2
A generalised semantic cognition account of aesthetic experience.一种审美体验的广义语义认知解释。
Neuropsychologia. 2022 Aug 13;173:108288. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108288. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
3
Effects of Design Aesthetics on the Perceived Value of a Product.
设计美学对产品感知价值的影响。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 29;12:670800. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.670800. eCollection 2021.
4
Functions of Interoception: From Energy Regulation to Experience of the Self.内感受的功能:从能量调节到自我体验
Trends Neurosci. 2021 Jan;44(1):29-38. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2020.09.008.
5
Seeking the "Beauty Center" in the Brain: A Meta-Analysis of fMRI Studies of Beautiful Human Faces and Visual Art.在大脑中寻找“美丽中心”:对美丽人脸和视觉艺术 fMRI 研究的元分析。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2020 Dec;20(6):1200-1215. doi: 10.3758/s13415-020-00827-z. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
6
NeuroQuery, comprehensive meta-analysis of human brain mapping.神经查询,人类大脑图谱的全面元分析。
Elife. 2020 Mar 4;9:e53385. doi: 10.7554/eLife.53385.
7
Dynamics of aesthetic experience are reflected in the default-mode network.审美体验的动力学反映在默认模式网络中。
Neuroimage. 2019 Mar;188:584-597. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.12.017. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
8
Assessing robustness against potential publication bias in Activation Likelihood Estimation (ALE) meta-analyses for fMRI.评估 fMRI 的激活似然估计(ALE)荟萃分析中潜在发表偏倚的稳健性。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 30;13(11):e0208177. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208177. eCollection 2018.
9
A Coordinate-Based Meta-Analysis of Overlaps in Regional Specialization and Functional Connectivity across Subjective Value and Default Mode Networks.基于坐标的主观价值网络与默认模式网络区域专业化及功能连接重叠的元分析。
Front Neurosci. 2017 Jan 19;11:1. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00001. eCollection 2017.
10
The Difference between Aesthetic Appreciation of Artistic and Popular Music: Evidence from an fMRI Study.艺术音乐与流行音乐审美欣赏的差异:来自一项功能磁共振成像研究的证据。
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 4;11(11):e0165377. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165377. eCollection 2016.