Suppr超能文献

高非球面微透镜镜片与角膜塑形术治疗眼轴长度延长的比较

Comparison of spectacle lenses with highly aspherical lenslets versus orthokeratology for the management of axial length elongation.

作者信息

Wang Haizhao, Li Jianhua, Zhang Jinming, Liu Xiaoyu, Guo Hui

机构信息

Aier Eye Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.

Department of Pretrain Data, Tencent Technology Engineering Group, Shenzhen, China.

出版信息

Clin Exp Optom. 2025 Nov;108(8):937-942. doi: 10.1080/08164622.2024.2447469. Epub 2025 Jan 20.

Abstract

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

When selecting an intervention for myopia management, parental inquiries centre around the comparative efficacy of orthokeratology versus myopic defocus spectacle lenses. This prompts an intriguing investigation into the nuanced differences between these two treatment methods.

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the efficacy of spectacle lenses with highly aspherical lenslets (HAL) versus orthokeratology (Ortho-k) in controlling axial length elongation.

METHODS

Electronic medical records of children aged 8 to 14 years who were prescribed either spectacle lenses with HAL or one of the four Ortho-k brands were reviewed. The standardised axial length changes within one year were compared between HAL lenses and Ortho-k lenses with analysis of variance and multivariable regression analysis, adjusting for age, gender, and baseline spherical equivalent.

RESULTS

A total of 308 subjects were included in the analyses. The mean (standard error) of the standardised one-year changes in axial length was 0.12 ± 0.02 mm for HAL, 0.17 ± 0.02 mm for Dreamlite, 0.22 ± 0.02 mm for Alpha, 0.21 ± 0.02 mm for Lucid, and 0.18 ± 0.02 mm for Euclid user cohorts. After adjusting for covariates, the mean differences in axial length growth between HAL and both Alpha and Lucid cohorts were estimated at 0.11 mm (95% CI, 0.03 to 0.19 mm and 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.20 mm). The differences between HAL and Dreamlite or Euclid lenses were not statistically significant. Baseline spherical equivalent demonstrated a significant positive association with axial length growth in Lucid and Euclid lens users.

CONCLUSIONS

Spectacle lenses with HAL design exhibited comparable or superior efficacy in mitigating axial length growth compared to conventional Ortho-k lenses. Furthermore, orthokeratology showed greater efficacy in controlling axial length elongation among individuals with greater baseline myopia.

摘要

临床相关性

在选择近视管理干预措施时,家长们的询问主要围绕角膜塑形术与近视离焦眼镜片的相对疗效。这引发了对这两种治疗方法细微差异的有趣研究。

背景

本研究旨在比较非球面微透镜(HAL)眼镜片与角膜塑形术(Ortho-k)在控制眼轴长度增长方面的疗效。

方法

回顾了8至14岁儿童的电子病历,这些儿童被处方使用HAL眼镜片或四种角膜塑形术品牌之一。通过方差分析和多变量回归分析比较了HAL镜片和角膜塑形术镜片在一年内的标准化眼轴长度变化,并对年龄、性别和基线球镜等效度进行了调整。

结果

共有308名受试者纳入分析。HAL组标准化一年眼轴长度变化的平均值(标准误)为0.12±0.02mm,Dreamlite组为0.17±0.02mm,Alpha组为0.22±0.02mm,Lucid组为0.21±0.02mm,Euclid组为0.18±0.02mm。调整协变量后,HAL组与Alpha组和Lucid组之间眼轴长度增长的平均差异估计为0.11mm(95%CI,0.03至0.19mm和95%CI,0.03至0.20mm)。HAL组与Dreamlite组或Euclid组镜片之间的差异无统计学意义。基线球镜等效度在Lucid组和Euclid组镜片使用者中与眼轴长度增长呈显著正相关。

结论

与传统角膜塑形术镜片相比,HAL设计的眼镜片在减轻眼轴长度增长方面表现出相当或更好的疗效。此外,角膜塑形术在控制基线近视程度较高者的眼轴长度增长方面显示出更大的疗效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验