Suppr超能文献

间歇性多次IPACK阻滞联合ACB对膝关节屈曲挛缩性关节炎行全膝关节置换术患者的镇痛效果

Analgesic Effect of Intermittent Multiple IPACK Block Combined with ACB in Patients with Flexion Contracture Knee Arthritis Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty.

作者信息

Ren Yuqi, Hou Zhouhui, Zhang Yue, Li Yue, Liu Huanqiu

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, People's Republic of China.

Department of Anesthesiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, Tianjin, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J Knee Surg. 2025 May;38(6):316-322. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1801822. Epub 2025 Jan 20.

Abstract

We aimed to compare the analgesic effects of intermittent multiple infiltrations between the popliteal artery and capsule of the posterior knee (IPACK) combined with adductor canal block (ACB) and intermittent ACB alone in patients with flexion contracture knee arthritis undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Forty-six patients who underwent elective unilateral TKA were divided into two groups ( = 23 each): intermittent multiple IPACK combined with ACB (group IA) and intermittent multiple ACB (group A). ACB was performed with 20 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine in each group and IPACK with 20 mL of 0.25% ropivacaine in group IA. Intermittent multiple nerve blocks were used for postoperative analgesia (IPACK block combined with ACB in group IA and ACB in group A between 7:30 and 8:30 a.m. on postoperative day 1 [POD1] and postoperative day 2 [POD2]). Primary outcomes assessed were pain at rest, motion-evoked pain (MEP), and range of motion (ROM) on POD1 and POD2. Secondary outcomes included opioid consumption, first ambulation time, ambulation distance, and postoperative complications. We observed that compared with group A, MEP decreased, ROM became wider, ambulation distance was longer, and opioid consumption decreased in group IA. Other outcomes were either similar between the groups or showed clinically insignificant differences. We conclude that multiple intermittent IPACK therapy combined with ACB provides superior analgesia than multiple intermittent ACB therapy alone in patients with flexion contracture knee arthritis undergoing TKA.

摘要

我们旨在比较间歇性腘动脉与后膝关节囊多部位浸润(IPACK)联合收肌管阻滞(ACB)与单纯间歇性ACB对膝关节屈曲挛缩性关节炎患者行全膝关节置换术(TKA)时的镇痛效果。46例行择期单侧TKA的患者被分为两组(每组23例):间歇性多部位IPACK联合ACB(IA组)和间歇性多部位ACB(A组)。每组均用20 mL 0.375%的罗哌卡因进行ACB,IA组用20 mL 0.25%的罗哌卡因进行IPACK。术后镇痛采用间歇性多部位神经阻滞(IA组为IPACK阻滞联合ACB,A组为ACB,于术后第1天[POD1]和术后第2天[POD2]上午7:30至8:30进行)。评估的主要结局指标为POD1和POD2时的静息痛、运动诱发痛(MEP)和活动范围(ROM)。次要结局指标包括阿片类药物用量、首次行走时间、行走距离和术后并发症。我们观察到,与A组相比,IA组的MEP降低、ROM增大、行走距离更长且阿片类药物用量减少。其他结局指标在两组之间要么相似,要么显示出临床意义不显著的差异。我们得出结论,在膝关节屈曲挛缩性关节炎行TKA的患者中,多部位间歇性IPACK疗法联合ACB比单纯多部位间歇性ACB疗法提供更优的镇痛效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8a9/12020490/2b60834798e0/10-1055-s-0044-1801822-i24oct0215oa-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验