Suppr超能文献

膝关节置换术中腘动脉与膝关节后囊间隙(IPACK)阻滞:一项前瞻性随机试验。

The Interspace Between Popliteal Artery and Posterior Capsule of the Knee (IPACK) Block in Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Trial.

机构信息

Department of anesthesia and surgical intensive care, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.

Department of Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.

出版信息

Pain Physician. 2022 May;25(3):E427-E433.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Optimal analgesia following knee surgery is essential for early mobilization and rehabilitation and minimizing morbidity.

OBJECTIVES

We compared the addition of the interspace between the popliteal artery and the posterior capsule of the knee (IPACK) block to the adductor canal block (ACB) versus ACB alone on postoperative analgesia and ambulation ability in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective randomized study.

SETTING

An academic medical center.

METHODS

Eighty patients undergoing TKA were randomly allocated to receive either ACB or combined ACB-IPACK block at the end of surgery. ACB was performed using 20 mL bupivacaine 0.25% in both groups, while IPACK block using 30 mL bupivacaine 0.25% was added in the ACB-IPACK group only. Visual analog scale (VAS) was evaluated at rest and with 45° knee flexion at 4, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively. The quadriceps muscle power and mobilization ability were assessed at 12 hours and 24 hours postoperative. Total 24 hour postoperative morphine consumption, time to first rescue analgesic request, and patient satisfaction were documented.

RESULTS

The mean postoperative morphine consumption was higher in the ACB group (20.93 ± 7.17 mg) than the ACB-IPACK group (9.68 ± 3.56 mg) (P < 0.001, 95% CI; 8.71; 13.79). The time to 1st rescue analgesic consumption was longer in the ACB-IPACK group (645 ± 254 min) than ACB group (513 ± 247 min) (P = 0.021, 95% CI; 20.4; 243.6). At 4 hours, 6 hours, and 12 hours postoperative, the median postoperative VAS scores were higher in the ACB group than those of the ACB-IPACK group at rest (P = 0.003, 0.001 and 0.007) and on 45° knee flexion (P = 0.001, 0.001, 0.002) respectively. At 24 hours, the median VAS score was comparable between both groups both at rest and on 45° knee flexion (P = 0.358 & 0.054), respectively. The TUG test and the straight leg raise (MRC) scales at 12 hours, and 24 hours postoperative were comparable between both groups (P > 0.05).

LIMITATIONS

This study was limited by its small sample size.

CONCLUSION

The addition of IPACK to the ACB significantly reduced the postoperative morphine consumption and postoperative pain scores compared to the ACB alone without significant difference in mobilization ability in patients undergoing TKA.

摘要

背景

膝关节手术后的最佳镇痛对于早期活动和康复以及降低发病率至关重要。

目的

我们比较了在全膝关节置换术(TKA)患者中,与单独使用收肌管阻滞(ACB)相比,在 ACB 中加入膝关节后囊和腘窝间隙(IPACK)阻滞对术后镇痛和活动能力的影响。

研究设计

前瞻性随机研究。

地点

学术医疗中心。

方法

80 例行 TKA 的患者随机分为接受 ACB 或 ACB-IPACK 阻滞术的组。两组均在手术结束时使用 20 mL 0.25%布比卡因进行 ACB,而仅在 ACB-IPACK 组中添加 30 mL 0.25%布比卡因进行 IPACK 阻滞术。在术后 4、6、12 和 24 小时评估静息和 45°膝关节屈曲时的视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分。在术后 12 小时和 24 小时评估股四头肌力量和活动能力。记录术后 24 小时内的吗啡总消耗量、首次解救镇痛需求时间和患者满意度。

结果

ACB 组(20.93±7.17 mg)的术后吗啡消耗量高于 ACB-IPACK 组(9.68±3.56 mg)(P<0.001,95%CI;8.71;13.79)。ACB-IPACK 组首次解救镇痛需求时间(645±254 min)长于 ACB 组(513±247 min)(P=0.021,95%CI;20.4;243.6)。术后 4 小时、6 小时和 12 小时,ACB 组静息时和 45°膝关节屈曲时的术后 VAS 评分中位数均高于 ACB-IPACK 组(P=0.003,0.001 和 0.007)。术后 24 小时,两组在静息和 45°膝关节屈曲时的 VAS 评分中位数相当(P=0.358 和 0.054)。术后 12 小时和 24 小时的 TUG 测试和直腿抬高(MRC)评分在两组间无差异(P>0.05)。

局限性

本研究的样本量较小。

结论

与单独使用 ACB 相比,在 ACB 中加入 IPACK 可显著减少术后吗啡消耗量和术后疼痛评分,而对 TKA 患者的活动能力无显著影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验