• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索重症监护病房临终关怀的质量:一项针对穆斯林患者家属的定性多案例研究方法

Exploring the quality of end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: a qualitative multiple case study approach with family members of Muslim patients.

作者信息

Nayfeh Ayah, Conn Lesley Gotlib, Dale Craig, Fowler Robert

机构信息

Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 20;15(1):e087871. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087871.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087871
PMID:39832994
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11749587/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Muslim patients are an underrepresented community in end-of-life care research, with little evidence around factors that influence the quality and experience of care. The aim of this study was to explore the quality of end-of-life care in the intensive care unit (ICU) from the perspective of next-of-kin family members of Muslim patients.

DESIGN

A qualitative multiple case study design using semistructured interviews with family members of Muslim patients. Healthcare providers' notes from the patient medical record were also used to contextualise the patient care experience and medical journey. Data were analysed using deductive content analysis.

SETTING

A large academic tertiary care hospital in Toronto, Canada.

PARTICIPANTS

Next-of-kin family members of Muslim patients (≥18 years) who were admitted to the ICU and died in hospital between October 2019 and December 2021.

RESULTS

Family members of five Muslim patients of South Asian descent were recruited for this study. Four central themes were identified: (1) trust and confidence in the healthcare team overseen by medical experts; (2) quality communication with medical experts; (3) achieving patient goals of care; and (4) dignity of care through cultural respect and emotional support. Culture, religion and religiosity did not appear to have a major influence on the medical decision-making process. Communication, emotional and psychological well-being for patients, and cultural respect were identified as possible areas for quality improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings identified central themes in the quality of end-of-life care for families of seriously ill Muslim patients. These insights can inform clinical processes and interventions to improve the quality of care and reduce psychological and emotional burden at the end of life.

摘要

目的

在临终关怀研究中,穆斯林患者群体的代表性不足,关于影响护理质量和体验的因素的证据很少。本研究的目的是从穆斯林患者近亲家属的角度探讨重症监护病房(ICU)的临终关怀质量。

设计

采用定性多案例研究设计,对穆斯林患者的家属进行半结构式访谈。还使用了患者病历中的医疗服务提供者记录,以了解患者的护理体验和医疗过程。采用演绎性内容分析法对数据进行分析。

地点

加拿大多伦多的一家大型学术三级护理医院。

参与者

2019年10月至2021年12月期间入住ICU并在医院死亡的穆斯林患者(≥18岁)的近亲家属。

结果

招募了五名南亚裔穆斯林患者的家属参与本研究。确定了四个核心主题:(1)对由医学专家监督的医疗团队的信任和信心;(2)与医学专家的高质量沟通;(3)实现患者的护理目标;(4)通过文化尊重和情感支持实现护理尊严。文化、宗教和宗教信仰似乎对医疗决策过程没有重大影响。沟通、患者的情绪和心理健康以及文化尊重被确定为可能需要改进质量的领域。

结论

我们的研究结果确定了重症穆斯林患者家庭临终关怀质量的核心主题。这些见解可为临床流程和干预措施提供参考,以提高护理质量,减轻临终时的心理和情感负担。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d92/11749587/8275a24f8762/bmjopen-15-1-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d92/11749587/8275a24f8762/bmjopen-15-1-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d92/11749587/8275a24f8762/bmjopen-15-1-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploring the quality of end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: a qualitative multiple case study approach with family members of Muslim patients.探索重症监护病房临终关怀的质量:一项针对穆斯林患者家属的定性多案例研究方法
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 20;15(1):e087871. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087871.
2
Caring for terminally ill Muslim patients: Lived experiences of non-Muslim nurses.照顾晚期穆斯林患者:非穆斯林护士的亲身经历
Palliat Support Care. 2016 Dec;14(6):599-611. doi: 10.1017/S1478951516000249. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
3
Supporting Muslim families before and after a death in neonatal and paediatric intensive care units.支持新生儿和儿科重症监护病房中穆斯林家庭的生与死。
Nurs Crit Care. 2019 Jul;24(4):192-200. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12434. Epub 2019 May 24.
4
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
5
Surgeon Communication and Family Understanding of Patient Prognosis in Critically Ill Surgical Patients: A Qualitative Investigation Informs Resident Training.外科医生与重症外科患者家属对患者预后的沟通:一项定性研究为住院医师培训提供信息。
J Surg Educ. 2019 Nov-Dec;76(6):e77-e91. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.05.017. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
6
Patient and Family Member-Led Research in the Intensive Care Unit: A Novel Approach to Patient-Centered Research.重症监护病房中患者及家属主导的研究:一种以患者为中心的新型研究方法。
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 5;11(8):e0160947. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160947. eCollection 2016.
7
Grief reactions and coping strategies of Muslim nurses dealing with death.穆斯林护士应对死亡时的悲伤反应和应对策略。
Nurs Crit Care. 2020 Sep;25(5):277-283. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12481. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
8
Clinician End-of-Life Experiences With Pediatric Muslim Patients at a US Quaternary Care Center.美国一家四级医疗中心的临床医生与儿科穆斯林患者的临终经历。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022 May;63(5):673-679. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.01.005. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
9
"It's better to have three brains working instead of one": a qualitative study of building therapeutic alliance with family members of critically ill patients.“三个大脑协同工作总比一个好”:一项关于与重症患者家属建立治疗联盟的定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jul 9;18(1):533. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3341-1.
10
End-of-Life Decision-Making for ICU Patients With Limited English Proficiency: A Qualitative Study of Healthcare Team Insights.重症监护病房有限英语能力患者的临终决策:医疗团队观点的定性研究。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Oct;47(10):1380-1387. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003920.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating satisfaction with the quality and provision of end-of-life care for patients from diverse ethnocultural backgrounds.评估不同种族文化背景患者对临终关怀质量和服务的满意度。
BMC Palliat Care. 2021 Sep 17;20(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00841-z.
2
The Great Saturation Debate: What the "S Word" Means and Doesn't Mean in Qualitative Research Reporting.大饱和度辩论:“饱和度”一词在定性研究报告中的含义与非含义
Can J Nurs Res. 2020 Mar;52(1):3-5. doi: 10.1177/0844562119898554. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
3
Association Between Immigrant Status and End-of-Life Care in Ontario, Canada.
加拿大安大略省移民身份与临终关怀之间的关联
JAMA. 2017 Oct 17;318(15):1479-1488. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.14418.
4
Understanding Early Decisions to Withdraw Life-Sustaining Therapy in Cardiac Arrest Survivors. A Qualitative Investigation.理解心脏骤停幸存者放弃维持生命治疗的早期决策。一项定性研究。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Jul;13(7):1115-22. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201511-751OC.
5
Communication about serious illness care goals: a review and synthesis of best practices.关于重病护理目标的沟通:最佳实践的综述和综合。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Dec;174(12):1994-2003. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.5271.
6
Errors of medical interpretation and their potential clinical consequences: a comparison of professional versus ad hoc versus no interpreters.医学口译错误及其潜在临床后果:专业译员、临时译员与无译员的比较。
Ann Emerg Med. 2012 Nov;60(5):545-53. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.01.025. Epub 2012 Mar 15.
7
Racial and ethnic differences in preferences for end-of-life treatment.种族和民族差异对临终治疗的偏好。
J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Jun;24(6):695-701. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-0952-6. Epub 2009 Apr 23.
8
The qualitative content analysis process.定性内容分析过程。
J Adv Nurs. 2008 Apr;62(1):107-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x.
9
Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.定性研究报告的统一标准(COREQ):访谈和焦点小组的32项清单
Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
10
What matters most in end-of-life care: perceptions of seriously ill patients and their family members.临终关怀中最重要的事情:重症患者及其家属的看法。
CMAJ. 2006 Feb 28;174(5):627-33. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.050626.