Uriot Ophélie, Defois-Fraysse Clémence, Couturier Ingrid, Deschamps Charlotte, Durif Claude, Chaudemanche Cyril, Dreux-Zigha Assia, Blanquet-Diot Stéphanie
UMR 454 MEDIS, Microbiologie Environnement Digestif et Santé, Université Clermont Auvergne - INRAE, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Greencell, Biopôle Clermont Limagne, Saint-Beauzire, France.
Curr Res Food Sci. 2024 Dec 26;10:100968. doi: 10.1016/j.crfs.2024.100968. eCollection 2025.
Associated to various illnesses, Western Diet (WD) is acknowledged to have deleterious effects on human gut microbiota, decreasing bacterial diversity, lowering gut bacteria associated to health (such as , while increasing those linked to diseases (e.g., ). In this study, we evaluated the potential of two new prebiotics to counteract the negative effect of WD on gut microbiota, namely raffinose family oligosaccharides (RFO) from chickpeas and laminarin (LAM) from algae, when compared to the well-known inulin (INU). The effects of prebiotics on gut microbiota composition and metabolic activities were investigated in the Mucosal-Artificial Colon, set-up to reproduce WD condition, as compared to healthy control (n = 3). None of the prebiotics was able to efficiently offset the shift in microbiota induced by WD. Nevertheless, when compared to non-supplemented WD, all prebiotics showed significant impacts on microbiota composition, that were both prebiotic and donor-dependant. RFO was the only prebiotic to enhance α-diversity, while it led to an increase in and , associated with higher amounts of gas and butyrate. LAM and INU did not strongly impact microbial metabolic activities but were associated with a rise in / and respectively. To conclude, this study showed that all tested prebiotics had different impacts on human gut microbiota structure and activities, which was further donor-dependent. M-ARCOL appears as a suitable tool to better understand the mechanisms of action of prebiotic compounds in relation to gut microbes and define responders and non-responders to prebiotic supplementation, opening the possibility of customized nutritional strategies.
与多种疾病相关的西方饮食(WD)被认为会对人类肠道微生物群产生有害影响,降低细菌多样性,减少与健康相关的肠道细菌(如 ),同时增加与疾病相关的细菌(如 )。在本研究中,我们评估了两种新型益生元抵消WD对肠道微生物群负面影响的潜力,即来自鹰嘴豆的棉子糖家族寡糖(RFO)和来自藻类的海带多糖(LAM),并与著名的菊粉(INU)进行比较。与健康对照(n = 3)相比,在模拟WD条件的黏膜人工结肠中研究了益生元对肠道微生物群组成和代谢活性的影响。没有一种益生元能够有效抵消WD引起的微生物群变化。然而,与未添加益生元的WD相比,所有益生元对微生物群组成均有显著影响,且这种影响既取决于益生元,也取决于供体。RFO是唯一能提高α多样性的益生元,同时它还导致 和 增加,与更多的气体和丁酸盐相关。LAM和INU对微生物代谢活性没有强烈影响,但分别与 / 和 的增加有关。总之,本研究表明,所有测试的益生元对人类肠道微生物群结构和活性都有不同影响,且这种影响进一步取决于供体。黏膜人工结肠似乎是一种合适的工具,可用于更好地理解益生元化合物与肠道微生物相关的作用机制,并确定益生元补充的反应者和无反应者,从而开启定制营养策略的可能性。