Farooqi Waqar, Alabdullkarim Futon A, Abukaram Talal M, Gubran Lamis, Alsulami Deema S, Albehairi Sahar A, Alabdulkarim Fay A, Wadaan Arwa M
Internal Medicine, Almaarefa University, Riyadh, SAU.
Pharmacology, Riyadh Elm University, Riyadh, SAU.
Cureus. 2024 Dec 19;16(12):e76044. doi: 10.7759/cureus.76044. eCollection 2024 Dec.
Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by motor and non-motor symptoms that profoundly impact patients' quality of life. While pharmacological therapies such as levodopa remain the mainstay of treatment, their long-term use is often limited by motor complications. Device-based interventions, including deep brain stimulation (DBS) and continuous dopaminergic infusions, have emerged as alternatives, promising sustained symptomatic control and reduced medication-related side effects. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the comparative efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of device-based interventions versus pharmacological therapies in the management of advanced PD. A comprehensive search was conducted across multiple databases to identify randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and systematic reviews. Primary outcomes included motor function improvement, quality of life, and adverse events. Meta-analyses were performed, and subgroup analyses explored the effectiveness of specific interventions. Device-based interventions demonstrated superior efficacy over pharmacological therapies, with a pooled effect size (Cohen's d) of 1.12 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.94-1.29) for motor symptom control and quality of life improvements. Subgroup analyses showed DBS and levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel to be particularly effective, with levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel showing a Cohen's d of 1.25 (95% CI: 0.91-1.58). Device-based therapies also reduced medication dosages and associated motor complications. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these findings, and no significant publication bias was detected. However, gaps remain in understanding the long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness of these interventions. Device-based interventions, especially DBS and levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel, offer superior symptom control and quality of life improvements compared to traditional pharmacological therapies in advanced PD. These findings support the integration of device-based therapies into personalized treatment strategies. Further research is needed to explore long-term outcomes and establish standardized guidelines for their implementation in clinical practice.
帕金森病(PD)是一种进行性神经退行性疾病,其特征为运动和非运动症状,这些症状会严重影响患者的生活质量。虽然左旋多巴等药物疗法仍是主要治疗手段,但其长期使用常受运动并发症限制。包括深部脑刺激(DBS)和持续多巴胺能输注在内的基于设备的干预措施已成为替代方案,有望实现持续的症状控制并减少药物相关副作用。本系统评价和荟萃分析评估了基于设备的干预措施与药物疗法在晚期帕金森病管理中的比较疗效、安全性和成本效益。对多个数据库进行了全面检索,以识别随机对照试验、观察性研究和系统评价。主要结局包括运动功能改善、生活质量和不良事件。进行了荟萃分析,亚组分析探讨了特定干预措施的有效性。基于设备的干预措施在疗效上优于药物疗法,运动症状控制和生活质量改善的合并效应量(科恩d值)为1.12(95%置信区间(CI):0.94 - 1.29)。亚组分析显示DBS和左旋多巴 - 卡比多巴肠凝胶特别有效,左旋多巴 - 卡比多巴肠凝胶的科恩d值为1.25(95%CI:0.91 - 1.58)。基于设备的疗法还减少了药物剂量和相关运动并发症。敏感性分析证实了这些结果的稳健性,未检测到明显的发表偏倚。然而,在理解这些干预措施的长期结局和成本效益方面仍存在差距。与晚期帕金森病的传统药物疗法相比,基于设备的干预措施,尤其是DBS和左旋多巴 - 卡比多巴肠凝胶,在症状控制和生活质量改善方面更具优势。这些发现支持将基于设备的疗法纳入个性化治疗策略。需要进一步研究以探索长期结局并建立在临床实践中实施这些疗法的标准化指南。