Friedrich Marcus C G, Krenz Bianca
Institute of Educational Psychology, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2025 Jan 7;15:1496140. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1496140. eCollection 2024.
In many languages, it is common to use masculine-only forms when all genders are meant or gender is irrelevant to the actual statement. This practice is criticized for making women and members of other genders, their achievements and interests, less visible. Gender-fair language is intended to represent all genders equally. Recently introduced forms such as the glottal stop and the gender star are intended to also represent people outside the male-female dichotomy on the linguistic surface. However, it is often argued that gender-fair language would make texts less comprehensible and less aesthetically appealing. The critics' assumptions were tested in an experiment with 272 participants. Subjects watched a screencast on self-regulated learning and were randomly assigned to either a version using masculine-only forms or a version using the glottal stop and the gender star. Subsequently, participants rated the comprehensibility and aesthetic appeal of the video they had watched. Structural equation models show no statistically significant influence of the use of gender-fair language on the comprehensibility ( = -0.13) or the aesthetic appeal ( = -0.16) of the videos. The critics' assumptions are therefore not supported. But further studies are needed, especially regarding the corresponding singular forms and with non-academic participants.
在许多语言中,当指代所有性别或性别与实际表述无关时,仅使用阳性形式是很常见的。这种做法受到批评,因为它使得女性和其他性别的人以及他们的成就和兴趣变得不那么明显。性别公平语言旨在平等地代表所有性别。最近引入的诸如喉塞音和性别星号等形式,也旨在在语言层面上代表男女二元划分之外的人。然而,人们经常认为,性别公平语言会使文本的可理解性降低,美学吸引力减弱。在一项有272名参与者的实验中对批评者的假设进行了检验。受试者观看了一段关于自我调节学习的屏幕录像,并被随机分配到使用仅阳性形式的版本或使用喉塞音和性别星号的版本。随后,参与者对他们观看的视频的可理解性和美学吸引力进行评分。结构方程模型显示,使用性别公平语言对视频的可理解性(β = -0.13)或美学吸引力(β = -0.16)没有统计学上的显著影响。因此,批评者的假设不成立。但还需要进一步的研究,特别是关于相应的单数形式以及针对非学术参与者的研究。