• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同治疗方案对树脂复合材料修复体抗剪粘接强度的影响。

The effect of different treatment protocols on shear bond strength in resin composite restoration repair.

机构信息

Gazi University Faculty of Dentistry ABD, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2024 Oct 24;24(1):1279. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04918-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12903-024-04918-y
PMID:39449150
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11515381/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

It was aimed to investigate the effect of sandblasting and laser surface treatment on shear bond strength in composite restoration repair in vitro.

METHODS

A micro-hybrid composite (Filtek Z250, 3 M-ESPE, USA) was used to prepare 120 samples. The samples were subjected to a thermal cycle test 5,000 times between 5 and 55 C, and they were randomly divided into 12 groups (n = 10). No surface treatment was performed in Groups 1 to 4, which were designed as control groups. The surfaces of the samples in Groups 5 to 8 were sandblasted with a Cojet device, and the surfaces of the samples in Groups 9 to 12 were applied Er, Cr: YSGG laser. After the sample surfaces were divided into groups with and without acid etching, universal adhesive was applied, and the repair process was performed using Filtek Z250 or nano-filled resin composite (Filtek Ultimate, 3 M-ESPE, USA). The thermal cycle test was repeated 5,000 times between 5 and 55 C on all repaired samples. The repair shear bond strength of the samples was measured using a universal testing device (Shimadzu IG-IS, Kyoto, Japan). The fracture types were evaluated by optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Statistical analyses of the findings were evaluated by the Kruskal Wallis test and Mann Whitney U test at 0.05 significance degree.

RESULTS

The highest mean shear bond strength values were obtained from the samples sandblasted with CoJet, followed by Er, Cr: YSGG laser, and the control group. It was determined that there was a significant difference between the mean shear bond strength values obtained from the control group and the other surface treatment groups (p < 0.05). In general, significantly higher mean shear bond strength values were obtained when the universal adhesive was applied in total-etch mode compared to the application in self-etch mode (p < 0.05). Additionally, it was determined that higher shear bond strength values were obtained with Filtek Ultimate compared to Filtek Z250 (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that the use of universal adhesive in total-etch mode, in addition to surface treatments on the resin composite surface in the repair protocol and the use of nano-filled resin composite as repair material can increase the mean shear bond values in repair.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在体外探究喷砂和激光表面处理对复合树脂修复体剪切粘结强度的影响。

方法

采用微混合复合树脂(Filtek Z250,3M-ESPE,美国)制备 120 个样本。样本在 5℃至 55℃之间进行 5000 次热循环试验,然后随机分为 12 组(n=10)。第 1 组至第 4 组未进行表面处理,作为对照组。第 5 组至第 8 组的样本用 Cojet 设备喷砂处理,第 9 组至第 12 组的样本用 Er,Cr:YSGG 激光处理。对有酸蚀和无酸蚀的样本表面进行分组后,应用通用粘结剂,并用 Filtek Z250 或纳米填充树脂复合(Filtek Ultimate,3M-ESPE,美国)进行修复。所有修复后的样本均在 5℃至 55℃之间重复进行 5000 次热循环试验。采用万能试验机(Shimadzu IG-IS,日本京都)测量样本的修复剪切粘结强度。采用光学显微镜和扫描电子显微镜(SEM)评估断裂类型。采用 Kruskal Wallis 检验和 Mann Whitney U 检验在 0.05 显著性水平评估发现的统计学差异。

结果

CoJet 喷砂处理的样本获得的平均剪切粘结强度最高,其次是 Er,Cr:YSGG 激光处理和对照组。结果表明,对照组和其他表面处理组获得的平均剪切粘结强度值之间存在显著差异(p<0.05)。通常,全酸蚀模式下应用通用粘结剂的平均剪切粘结强度显著高于自酸蚀模式(p<0.05)。此外,与 Filtek Z250 相比,Filtek Ultimate 获得的剪切粘结强度更高(p<0.05)。

结论

在本研究的限制范围内,可以得出结论,在修复方案中,除了对树脂复合材料表面进行表面处理外,还可以在全酸蚀模式下使用通用粘结剂,并使用纳米填充树脂复合材料作为修复材料,这可以提高修复后的平均剪切粘结强度值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b093/11515381/2caa973e28e0/12903_2024_4918_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b093/11515381/a1bfd916fd9b/12903_2024_4918_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b093/11515381/6b07b595651c/12903_2024_4918_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b093/11515381/2caa973e28e0/12903_2024_4918_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b093/11515381/a1bfd916fd9b/12903_2024_4918_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b093/11515381/6b07b595651c/12903_2024_4918_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b093/11515381/2caa973e28e0/12903_2024_4918_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The effect of different treatment protocols on shear bond strength in resin composite restoration repair.不同治疗方案对树脂复合材料修复体抗剪粘接强度的影响。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Oct 24;24(1):1279. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04918-y.
2
Shear bond strength of composite bonded with three adhesives to Er,Cr:YSGG laser-prepared enamel.三种粘结剂粘结复合树脂与Er,Cr:YSGG激光预备牙釉质的剪切粘结强度。
Quintessence Int. 2010 Jun;41(6):e119-24.
3
Effect of Er,Cr:YSGG laser, air abrasion, and silane application on repaired shear bond strength of composites.Er,Cr:YSGG 激光、喷砂和硅烷处理对修复后复合材料剪切粘结强度的影响。
Oper Dent. 2013 May-Jun;38(3):E1-9. doi: 10.2341/11-054-L. Epub 2012 Nov 6.
4
Microleakage and shear punch bond strength in class II primary molars cavities restored with low shrink silorane based versus methacrylate based composite using three different techniques.使用三种不同技术,比较基于低收缩硅氧烷的复合材料与基于甲基丙烯酸酯的复合材料修复II类乳牙龋洞后的微渗漏和剪切冲头粘结强度。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2010 Winter;35(2):173-81. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.35.2.u6142007hj421041.
5
The efficacy of Er,Cr:YSGG laser and contemporary universal adhesive systems on composite resin repair bond strength: an in vitro study.Er,Cr:YSGG 激光与当代通用型粘结系统对复合树脂修复体粘结强度的影响:一项体外研究。
Odontology. 2024 Oct;112(4):1197-1208. doi: 10.1007/s10266-024-00932-2. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
6
Effect of surface treatments on microtensile bond strength of repaired aged silorane resin composite.表面处理对修复老化的硅烷树脂复合材料微拉伸粘结强度的影响。
Oper Dent. 2013 Jan-Feb;38(1):91-9. doi: 10.2341/11-057-L. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
7
Microshear bond strength and finite element analysis of resin composite adhesion to press-on-metal ceramic for repair actions after various conditioning methods.微剪切结合强度和有限元分析,用于修复各种预处理方法后的金属烤瓷修复体的树脂复合材料黏附。
J Adhes Dent. 2014 Feb;16(1):63-70. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a30164.
8
Shear bond strength of three different nano-restorative materials to dentin.三种不同纳米修复材料与牙本质的抗剪粘接强度。
Oper Dent. 2010 Jan-Feb;35(1):50-7. doi: 10.2341/09-051-L.
9
Effect of surface conditioning modalities on the repair bond strength of resin composite to the zirconia core / veneering ceramic complex.表面处理方式对树脂复合材料与氧化锆核/饰面陶瓷复合体修复粘结强度的影响。
J Adhes Dent. 2013 Jun;15(3):207-10. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a29717.
10
Effect of surface flattening and phototherapy on shear bond strength immediately after bleaching with different modes of universal adhesive.使用不同模式通用粘结剂漂白后立即进行表面平整和光疗对剪切粘结强度的影响。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2020 Jan;23(1):110-115. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_337_19.

本文引用的文献

1
Bond Durability of Two-Step HEMA-Free Universal Adhesive.两步法无HEMA通用粘合剂的粘结耐久性
J Funct Biomater. 2022 Aug 29;13(3):134. doi: 10.3390/jfb13030134.
2
Microtensile Repair Bond Strength of a Composite After Accelerated Artificial Aging: Effect of the Air Abrasion, Bur, Er:YAG Laser, Two-Step Self-etch Bonding, and Universal Bonding Repair System.加速人工老化后复合材料的微拉伸修复粘结强度:空气磨蚀、车针、铒钇铝石榴石激光、两步自酸蚀粘结和通用粘结修复系统的影响
J Lasers Med Sci. 2022 Apr 25;13:e18. doi: 10.34172/jlms.2022.18. eCollection 2022.
3
The clinical success of repaired posterior composite restorations with and without silane application.
有/无硅烷应用的后牙复合树脂修复体的临床成功率。
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Sep;26(9):5785-5793. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04535-5. Epub 2022 May 9.
4
The effect of different surface preparation methods and various aging periods on microtensile bond strength for composite resin repair.不同表面处理方法和不同老化时间对复合树脂修复体微拉伸粘结强度的影响。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2021 Feb;24(2):282-291. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_83_20.
5
Effect of Veneering Techniques on Shear and Microtensile Bond Strengths of Zirconia-Based All-Ceramic Systems.
J Adhes Dent. 2017 Dec 18:507-515. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a39595.
6
Adhesive system affects repair bond strength of resin composite.粘结系统会影响树脂复合材料的修复粘结强度。
J Istanb Univ Fac Dent. 2017 Oct 2;51(3):25-31. doi: 10.17096/jiufd.31921. eCollection 2017.
7
Effect of thermocycling and surface treatment on repair bond strength of composite.热循环和表面处理对复合材料修复粘结强度的影响。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2017 Aug 1;9(8):e945-e951. doi: 10.4317/jced.53721. eCollection 2017 Aug.
8
Effect of Surface Treatment, Silane, and Universal Adhesive on Microshear Bond Strength of Nanofilled Composite Repairs.表面处理、硅烷和通用粘结剂对纳米填料复合修复体微剪切粘结强度的影响。
Oper Dent. 2017 Jul/Aug;42(4):367-374. doi: 10.2341/16-259-L. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
9
Effect of different surface treatments on the shear bond strength of nanofilled composite repairs.不同表面处理对纳米填充复合修复材料剪切粘结强度的影响。
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2016 Winter;10(1):9-16. doi: 10.15171/joddd.2016.002. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
10
Effects of three surface conditioning techniques on repair bond strength of nanohybrid and nanofilled composites.三种表面处理技术对纳米混合复合材料和纳米填充复合材料修复粘结强度的影响。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2015 Nov-Dec;12(6):554-61. doi: 10.4103/1735-3327.170575.