• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重塑评估体系:COGwheel 使用 Qualtrics 热图进行协同设计的数字创新。

Reinventing the evaluation wheel: COGwheel's co-designed digital innovation using the Qualtrics heat map.

作者信息

Giugni Mel, Morse Alyssa R, Fitzpatrick Scott J, Lamb Heather, Gulliver Amelia, Calear Alison L, Bliokas Vida, Shand Fiona, Chakouch Cassandra, Edwards Bronwen, Ellis Louise A, Goj Purity, Lee Melissa, Main Merkitta, Miller Benn, Webb Glenda, Sargent Ginny, Skeat Helen, Stewart Kelly, Wells Kelly, McKay Carolyn, Team Stride Safe Space, Stewart Erin, Banfield Michelle

机构信息

Centre for Mental Health Research, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.

School of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.

出版信息

MethodsX. 2024 Dec 28;14:103147. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2024.103147. eCollection 2025 Jun.

DOI:10.1016/j.mex.2024.103147
PMID:39846013
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11751559/
Abstract

The involvement of service-users, clinicians, and other health service end-users is recognised as an essential part of health and medical research. This collaborative approach can significantly contribute to methodological advancements including the development of research instruments and measures that ensure their suitability for research participants. The current paper details the co-design, development and implementation of the novel, digitised COGwheel (Co-designed Outcomes for Guests Evaluation Wheel). COGwheel is a brief, user-friendly digital instrument based on the Evaluation Wheel. It uses Qualtrics' heatmap function to maximise ease of use for participants, alongside secure data collection, ease of analysis and simple interpretation. COGwheel was developed to evaluate peer-led, non-clinical 'safe spaces' for people experiencing emotional distress and/or suicidal crisis. However, the model has broader potential to be applied to other types of measures where it is essential to prioritise participant accessibility, comprehension, and ease of use. •COGwheel is a brief, user-friendly digital instrument based on the Evaluation Wheel (Evaluation Support Scotland), that was co-designed by people with lived experience of suicidal crisis or distress.•COGwheel addresses a significant gap in current evaluation methods, providing a novel digital instrument that also enhances accessibility and relevance for both participants and researchers.•Utilising Qualtrics' heatmap function, COGwheel enhances meaningful participant engagement and streamlines data collection, ensuring data security, interpretability, and efficient analysis.

摘要

服务使用者、临床医生和其他医疗服务终端用户的参与被视为健康和医学研究的重要组成部分。这种协作方法可以显著促进方法学的进步,包括开发研究工具和措施,以确保它们适用于研究参与者。本文详细介绍了新颖的数字化COGwheel(共同设计的访客评估轮结果)的共同设计、开发和实施。COGwheel是一种基于评估轮的简短、用户友好的数字工具。它使用Qualtrics的热图功能,在确保数据安全收集、便于分析和易于解读的同时,最大限度地提高参与者的使用便利性。COGwheel旨在评估由同伴主导的、针对经历情绪困扰和/或自杀危机的人群的非临床“安全空间”。然而,该模型具有更广泛的潜力,可应用于其他类型的措施,在这些措施中,优先考虑参与者的可及性、理解性和易用性至关重要。•COGwheel是一种基于评估轮(苏格兰评估支持)的简短、用户友好的数字工具,由有自杀危机或困扰经历的人共同设计。•COGwheel弥补了当前评估方法中的一个重大空白,提供了一种新颖的数字工具,同时提高了参与者和研究人员的可及性和相关性。•利用Qualtrics的热图功能,COGwheel增强了有意义的参与者参与度,简化了数据收集,确保了数据安全、可解读性和高效分析。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4171/11751559/fb50ed32aa20/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4171/11751559/1df23a6a7270/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4171/11751559/b8ba6eb73f09/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4171/11751559/1d6166fa808a/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4171/11751559/fc299041d02f/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4171/11751559/fb50ed32aa20/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4171/11751559/1df23a6a7270/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4171/11751559/b8ba6eb73f09/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4171/11751559/1d6166fa808a/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4171/11751559/fc299041d02f/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4171/11751559/fb50ed32aa20/gr4.jpg

相似文献

1
Reinventing the evaluation wheel: COGwheel's co-designed digital innovation using the Qualtrics heat map.重塑评估体系:COGwheel 使用 Qualtrics 热图进行协同设计的数字创新。
MethodsX. 2024 Dec 28;14:103147. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2024.103147. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Co-creating safe spaces: Study protocol for translational research on innovative alternatives to the emergency department for people experiencing emotional distress and/or suicidal crisis.共同创造安全空间:对为情绪困扰和/或自杀危机人群提供创新替代急诊方案的转化研究的研究方案。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 3;17(10):e0272483. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272483. eCollection 2022.
3
Exploring Web-Based Support for Suicidal Ideation in the Scottish Population: Usability Study.探索基于网络的针对苏格兰人群自杀意念的支持:可用性研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jan 24;9:e55932. doi: 10.2196/55932.
4
Co-Creation in Research: Further Reflections From the 'Co-Creating Safe Spaces' Project.共同创造研究:来自“共同创造安全空间”项目的进一步思考。
Health Expect. 2024 Dec;27(6):e70103. doi: 10.1111/hex.70103.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
Knowledge Families Hold: Co-Production and Co-Research With Mental Health Family Carers in Understanding Experiences During the COVID-19 Pandemic.知识家族的持有:在理解 COVID-19 大流行期间的经验方面,与心理健康家庭照顾者共同生产和共同研究。
Health Expect. 2024 Dec;27(6):e70093. doi: 10.1111/hex.70093.
8
A peer-delivered intervention to reduce harm and improve the well-being of homeless people with problem substance use: the SHARPS feasibility mixed-methods study.一种由同伴提供的干预措施,旨在减少有问题物质使用的无家可归者的伤害并改善其福祉:SHARPS 可行性混合方法研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 Feb;26(14):1-128. doi: 10.3310/WVVL4786.
9
Development and evaluation of a de-escalation training intervention in adult acute and forensic units: the EDITION systematic review and feasibility trial.成人急症和法医病房中降级治疗培训干预措施的制定和评估:EDITION 系统评价和可行性试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Jan;28(3):1-120. doi: 10.3310/FGGW6874.
10
Care models for coexisting serious mental health and alcohol/drug conditions: the RECO realist evidence synthesis and case study evaluation.共存严重精神健康和酒精/药物问题的护理模式:RECO 真实证据综合和案例研究评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(67):1-100. doi: 10.3310/JTNT0476.

本文引用的文献

1
Co-creating safe spaces: Study protocol for translational research on innovative alternatives to the emergency department for people experiencing emotional distress and/or suicidal crisis.共同创造安全空间:对为情绪困扰和/或自杀危机人群提供创新替代急诊方案的转化研究的研究方案。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 3;17(10):e0272483. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272483. eCollection 2022.
2
Research co-design in health: a rapid overview of reviews.健康领域的研究共同设计:综述快速概览。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Feb 11;18(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-0528-9.
3
Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review.
探究患者及公众参与对健康和社会照护研究的影响:一项系统综述
Health Expect. 2014 Oct;17(5):637-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00795.x. Epub 2012 Jul 19.