Brett Jo, Staniszewska Sophie, Mockford Carole, Herron-Marx Sandra, Hughes John, Tysall Colin, Suleman Rashida
Royal College of Nursing Research Institute, School of Health and Social Studies, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Health Expect. 2014 Oct;17(5):637-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00795.x. Epub 2012 Jul 19.
There is an increasing international interest in patient and public involvement (PPI) in research, yet relatively little robust evidence exists about its impact on health and social care research.
To identify the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research.
A systematic search of electronic databases and health libraries was undertaken from 1995 to 2009. Data were extracted and quality assessed utilizing the guidelines of the NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination 2009 and the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP). Grey literature was assessed using the Dixon-Woods et al. (2005) checklist.
All study types that reported the impact PPI had on the health and/or social care research study.
A total of 66 studies reporting the impact of PPI on health and social care research were included. The positive impacts identified enhanced the quality and appropriateness of research. Impacts were reported for all stages of research, including the development of user-focused research objectives, development of user-relevant research questions, development of user-friendly information, questionnaires and interview schedules, more appropriate recruitment strategies for studies, consumer-focused interpretation of data and enhanced implementation and dissemination of study results. Some challenging impacts were also identified.
This study provides the first international evidence of PPI impact that has emerged at all key stages of the research process. However, much of the evidence base concerning impact remains weak and needs significant enhancement in the next decade.
国际上对患者及公众参与研究(PPI)的兴趣日益浓厚,但关于其对健康和社会护理研究影响的有力证据相对较少。
确定患者及公众参与对健康和社会护理研究的影响。
对1995年至2009年的电子数据库和健康图书馆进行了系统检索。利用英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)评审与传播中心2009年的指南以及批判性评估技能计划(CASP)提取数据并进行质量评估。使用迪克森 - 伍兹等人(2005年)的清单对灰色文献进行评估。
所有报告患者及公众参与对健康和/或社会护理研究影响的研究类型。
共纳入66项报告患者及公众参与对健康和社会护理研究影响的研究。确定的积极影响提高了研究的质量和适宜性。研究各阶段均有影响报告,包括制定以用户为中心的研究目标、提出与用户相关的研究问题、开发用户友好型信息、问卷和访谈提纲、制定更合适的研究招募策略、以消费者为重点的数据解读以及加强研究结果的实施和传播。还确定了一些具有挑战性的影响。
本研究提供了患者及公众参与在研究过程所有关键阶段产生影响的首个国际证据。然而,关于影响的许多证据基础仍然薄弱,在未来十年需要大幅加强。