Muwonge J J, Dalman C, Burström B, Jablonska B, Hollander A-C
Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Centre for Epidemiology and Community Medicine, Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden.
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2025 Jan 23;34:e6. doi: 10.1017/S2045796024000842.
Although individuals with lower socio-economic position (SEP) have a higher prevalence of mental health problems than others, there is no conclusive evidence on whether mental healthcare (MHC) is provided equitably. We investigated inequalities in MHC use among adults in Stockholm County (Sweden), and whether inequalities were moderated by self-reported psychological distress.
MHC use was examined in 31,433 individuals aged 18-64 years over a 6-month follow-up period, after responding to the General Health Questionnaire-12 (GHQ-12) in 2014 or the Kessler Six (K6) in 2021. Information on their MHC use and SEP indicators, education, and household income, were sourced from administrative registries. Logistic and negative binomial regression analyses were used to estimate inequalities in gained MHC access and frequency of outpatient visits, with psychological distress as a moderating variable.
Individuals with lower education or income levels were more likely to gain access to MHC than those with high SEP, irrespective of distress levels. Education-related differences in gained MHC access diminished with increasing distress, from a 74% higher likelihood when reporting no distress (odds ratio, OR = 1.74 [95% confidence interval, 95% CI: 1.43-2.12]) to 30% when reporting severe distress (OR = 1.30 [0.98-1.72]). Comparable results were found for secondary care but not primary care i.e., lower education predicted reduced access to primary care in moderate-to-severe distress groups (e.g., OR = 0.63 [0.45-0.90]), and for physical but not digital services. Income-related differences in gained MHC access remained stable or increased with distress, especially for secondary care and physical services.
Overall, individuals with lower education and income used MHC services more than their counterparts with higher socio-economic status; however, low-educated individuals faced inequities in primary care and underutilized non-physician services such as visits to psychologists.
尽管社会经济地位较低的个体心理健康问题患病率高于其他人,但关于精神卫生保健(MHC)是否公平提供尚无确凿证据。我们调查了瑞典斯德哥尔摩郡成年人在使用MHC方面的不平等情况,以及这些不平等是否会因自我报告的心理困扰而有所缓和。
在2014年回答了一般健康问卷-12(GHQ-12)或2021年回答了凯斯勒六分量表(K6)的31433名18至64岁个体中,对其6个月随访期内的MHC使用情况进行了检查。他们的MHC使用情况、社会经济地位指标、教育程度和家庭收入信息均来自行政登记处。采用逻辑回归和负二项回归分析来估计获得MHC服务的不平等情况以及门诊就诊频率,将心理困扰作为一个调节变量。
教育程度或收入水平较低的个体比社会经济地位高的个体更有可能获得MHC服务,无论困扰程度如何。随着困扰程度增加,获得MHC服务方面与教育相关的差异逐渐减小,从报告无困扰时高出74%的可能性(优势比,OR = 1.74 [95%置信区间,95%CI:1.43 - 2.12])降至报告严重困扰时的30%(OR = 1.30 [0.98 - 1.72])。二级保健方面发现了类似结果,但初级保健方面未发现,即教育程度较低预示着在中度至重度困扰组中获得初级保健服务的机会减少(例如,OR = 0.63 [0.45 - 0.90]),在实体服务而非数字服务方面也是如此。获得MHC服务方面与收入相关的差异随着困扰程度保持稳定或增加,特别是在二级保健和实体服务方面。
总体而言,教育程度和收入较低的个体比社会经济地位较高的个体更多地使用MHC服务;然而,低教育程度个体在初级保健方面面临不公平,且未充分利用非医师服务,如看心理医生。