• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会经济因素与导致残疾抚恤金的常见精神障碍的心理治疗使用。

Socioeconomic factors and use of psychotherapy in common mental disorders predisposing to disability pension.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.

Pirkkala Municipal Health Centre, Pirkkala, Finland.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Aug 1;22(1):983. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08389-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-022-08389-1
PMID:35915437
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9344663/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Research in high-income countries has identified low socioeconomic status as a risk factor for disability pension (DP) due to common mental disorders (CMDs). Psychotherapy is an evidence-based treatment for the majority of CMDs along with medication and it is often targeted to prevent work disability. This study examines socioeconomic differences in the use of rehabilitative psychotherapy in Finland, where citizens have universal health coverage, but psychotherapy is partly dependent on personal finance.

METHODS

The study subjects (N = 22,501) were all the Finnish citizens granted a DP due to CMD between 2010 and 2015 and a comparison group (N = 57,732) matched based on age, gender, and hospital district. Socioeconomic differences in psychotherapy use were studied using logistic regression models. Socioeconomic status was defined by education, income, and occupation. Age, gender, and family status were also examined.

RESULTS

A lower level of education, lower occupational status (blue-collar worker), male gender, and older age, were associated with less frequent psychotherapy use, in both groups. Education was the strongest component of socioeconomic status associated with psychotherapy use, but the role of income was not straightforward. Unemployment when approaching DP, but not otherwise, was a risk factor for not receiving rehabilitative psychotherapy. Socioeconomic disparities were not any smaller among CMD patients approaching DP than in the comparison group.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the disparity in the provision of psychotherapy for CMD patients, even on the verge of DP with an acute need for services. This disparity is partly related to a complex interplay of socioeconomic factors and the service system characteristics. Factors predisposing to unequal access to mental health services are presumably diverse and should be studied further.

摘要

背景

在高收入国家的研究表明,社会经济地位较低是由于常见精神障碍(CMD)而导致残疾抚恤金(DP)的风险因素。心理治疗是针对大多数 CMD 的循证治疗方法,与药物治疗一起,它通常旨在预防工作残疾。本研究考察了在芬兰,公民享有全民健康覆盖,但心理治疗部分依赖个人财务的情况下,康复心理治疗的社会经济差异。

方法

研究对象(N=22501)均为 2010 年至 2015 年间因 CMD 获得 DP 的芬兰公民,以及一个基于年龄、性别和医院区匹配的对照组(N=57732)。使用逻辑回归模型研究了心理治疗使用中的社会经济差异。社会经济地位由教育、收入和职业定义。还检查了年龄、性别和家庭状况。

结果

在两组中,教育程度较低、职业地位较低(蓝领工人)、男性性别和年龄较大与较少接受心理治疗相关。教育是与心理治疗使用最相关的社会经济地位的最强组成部分,但收入的作用并不简单。接近 DP 时的失业,但不是其他情况,是未接受康复心理治疗的风险因素。接近 DP 的 CMD 患者的社会经济差距并不比对照组小。

结论

这项研究表明,即使在有急性服务需求的 DP 边缘,CMD 患者接受心理治疗的机会也存在差异。这种差异部分与社会经济因素和服务系统特征的复杂相互作用有关。导致心理健康服务获得不平等的因素可能多种多样,应进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed9e/9344663/be1011d9906a/12913_2022_8389_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed9e/9344663/25d0e3577afc/12913_2022_8389_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed9e/9344663/be1011d9906a/12913_2022_8389_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed9e/9344663/25d0e3577afc/12913_2022_8389_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed9e/9344663/be1011d9906a/12913_2022_8389_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Socioeconomic factors and use of psychotherapy in common mental disorders predisposing to disability pension.社会经济因素与导致残疾抚恤金的常见精神障碍的心理治疗使用。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Aug 1;22(1):983. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08389-1.
2
Socioeconomic status, psychotherapy duration, and return to work from disability due to common mental disorders.社会经济地位、心理治疗时长与常见精神障碍导致的残疾后重返工作岗位的关系。
Psychother Res. 2024 Jun;34(5):694-707. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2023.2229500. Epub 2023 Jul 3.
3
Socioeconomic factors in disability retirement due to mental disorders in Finland.因精神障碍导致残疾退休的社会经济因素在芬兰。
Eur J Public Health. 2020 Dec 11;30(6):1218-1224. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa132.
4
Contextual and mental health service factors in mental disorder-based disability pensioning in Finland - a regional comparison.芬兰基于精神障碍的残疾抚恤金的情境和心理健康服务因素-地区比较。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Oct 11;21(1):1081. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07099-4.
5
Trajectories of antidepressant medication use in individuals before and after being granted disability pension due to common mental disorders- a nationwide register-based study.常见精神障碍患者申请残疾抚恤金前后抗抑郁药物使用轨迹:一项全国范围内基于登记的研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Feb 13;18(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1628-8.
6
Trajectories of work disability and unemployment among young adults with common mental disorders.常见精神障碍青年劳动力丧失和失业轨迹。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Nov 6;18(1):1228. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6141-y.
7
Predictors of disability pension in long-term sickness absence: results from a population-based and prospective study in Norway 1994-1999.长期病假中残疾抚恤金的预测因素:1994 - 1999年挪威一项基于人群的前瞻性研究结果
Eur J Public Health. 2004 Dec;14(4):398-405. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/14.4.398.
8
Differences in predictors of permanent work disability between immigrants and natives: a cohort study of adults with sick leave due to common mental disorders.移民与本地居民永久性工作残疾预测因素的差异:一项针对因常见精神障碍而休病假成年人的队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Mar 17;7(3):e014431. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014431.
9
Mental health service diversity and work disability: associations of mental health service system characteristics and mood disorder disability pensioning in Finland.精神卫生服务多样性与工作残疾:芬兰精神卫生服务系统特征与心境障碍残疾抚恤金之间的关联。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2024 Apr;59(4):631-642. doi: 10.1007/s00127-023-02481-5. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
10
Consumption of psychotropic drugs among disability pension applicants with mental disorders: comparing awarded and rejected applicants in Finland.精神障碍残疾抚恤金申请者的精神药物使用情况:比较芬兰的获批和拒批申请者。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2021 Mar;56(3):437-448. doi: 10.1007/s00127-020-01850-8. Epub 2020 Mar 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Return to Work or Not: The Paths to Psychiatric Disability and Back.是否重返工作岗位:通往精神残疾及回归之路
J Occup Rehabil. 2025 Aug 11. doi: 10.1007/s10926-025-10312-4.
2
Socioeconomic status, antidepressant use, and return to work after disability due to common mental disorders.社会经济地位、抗抑郁药物的使用以及因常见精神障碍致残后重返工作岗位的情况。
Eur Psychiatry. 2025 Jun 13;68(1):e79. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.10046.
3
Exploring socio-economic inequalities in mental healthcare utilization in adults with self-reported psychological distress: a survey-registry linked cohort design.

本文引用的文献

1
Contextual and mental health service factors in mental disorder-based disability pensioning in Finland - a regional comparison.芬兰基于精神障碍的残疾抚恤金的情境和心理健康服务因素-地区比较。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Oct 11;21(1):1081. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07099-4.
2
Perceived need for treatment and non-utilization of outpatient psychotherapy in old age: two cohorts of a nationwide survey.老年人对治疗的感知需求与门诊心理治疗的未利用情况:一项全国性调查的两个队列。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 May 10;21(1):442. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06384-6.
3
Socioeconomic factors in disability retirement due to mental disorders in Finland.
探索自我报告有心理困扰的成年人在心理保健利用方面的社会经济不平等:一项调查-登记关联队列设计。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2025 Jan 23;34:e6. doi: 10.1017/S2045796024000842.
4
Trends in Outpatient Psychotherapy Among Adults in the US.美国成年人门诊心理治疗的趋势
JAMA Psychiatry. 2025 Mar 1;82(3):253-263. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.3903.
5
Psychotherapy use among migrants: a register-based longitudinal study.移民群体中精神心理治疗的使用情况:一项基于登记数据库的纵向研究
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2024 Dec 10;79(1):49-55. doi: 10.1136/jech-2024-222330.
6
Exploring patterns in mental health treatment and interests of single adults in the United States: a secondary data analysis.探索美国单身成年人心理健康治疗和兴趣模式:二次数据分析。
Front Public Health. 2024 Apr 22;12:1292603. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1292603. eCollection 2024.
7
Men's Access to Outpatient Psychosocial Cancer Counseling.男性获得门诊心理社会癌症咨询服务的机会。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2024 Feb 23;121(4):121-127. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2024.0005.
8
Patterns of mental health services and mood disorder disability pensions: a standard comparison of Finland's three largest hospital districts.精神卫生服务模式和心境障碍残疾抚恤金:芬兰三大医院区的标准比较。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Nov 13;23(1):828. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05342-2.
9
Sociodemographic Factors as Predictors of the Duration of Long-term Psychotherapy: Evidence from a Finnish Nationwide Register Study.社会人口学因素对长期心理治疗持续时间的预测作用:来自芬兰全国登记研究的证据。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2024 Jan;51(1):35-46. doi: 10.1007/s10488-023-01305-7. Epub 2023 Oct 12.
10
Impact of a Finnish reform adding new sickness absence checkpoints on rehabilitation and labor market outcomes: an interrupted time series analysis.芬兰一项新增疾病缺勤检查点的改革对康复及劳动力市场成果的影响:一项中断时间序列分析
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2023 Nov 1;49(8):588-597. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4122. Epub 2023 Oct 1.
因精神障碍导致残疾退休的社会经济因素在芬兰。
Eur J Public Health. 2020 Dec 11;30(6):1218-1224. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa132.
4
Psychotherapy for Depression Across Different Age Groups: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.不同年龄群体的抑郁症心理治疗:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2020 Jul 1;77(7):694-702. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.0164.
5
The importance of clinical and labour market histories in psychiatric disability retirement: analysis of the comprehensive Finnish national-level RETIRE data.临床和劳动力市场病史在精神科残疾退休中的重要性:对全面的芬兰国家级 RETIRE 数据的分析。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2020 Aug;55(8):1011-1020. doi: 10.1007/s00127-019-01815-6. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
6
The excess costs of depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis.抑郁症的额外成本:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2019 Apr 5;29:e30. doi: 10.1017/S2045796019000180.
7
The effectiveness of four empirically supported psychotherapies for primary care depression and anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis.四种经验支持的心理治疗对初级保健抑郁和焦虑的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Affect Disord. 2019 Feb 15;245:1168-1186. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.12.008. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
8
Income-based inequities in access to psychotherapy and other mental health services in Canada and Australia.加拿大和澳大利亚基于收入的心理治疗和其他心理健康服务获取方面的不平等。
Health Policy. 2019 Jan;123(1):45-50. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.10.011. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
9
Factors associated with health service utilisation for common mental disorders: a systematic review.常见心理障碍的卫生服务利用相关因素:系统评价。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Aug 22;18(1):262. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1837-1.
10
Engaging Men in Psychological Treatment: A Scoping Review.让男性参与心理治疗:一项范围综述
Am J Mens Health. 2018 Nov;12(6):1882-1900. doi: 10.1177/1557988318792157. Epub 2018 Aug 13.