• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

感官加工敏感性及其与运动行为和偏好运动强度的关系。

Sensory Processing Sensitivity and Its Relation to Exercise Behavior and Preferred Exercise Intensity.

作者信息

Webb Benjamin Lee

机构信息

Department of Applied Health, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville, Edwardsville, IL 62026, USA.

出版信息

J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2025 Jan 3;10(1):18. doi: 10.3390/jfmk10010018.

DOI:10.3390/jfmk10010018
PMID:39846659
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11755461/
Abstract

Regular exercise is important for overall health, yet exercise participation in the United States remains low. Exercise promotion depends on identifying factors such as personality that might influence exercise participation. Sensory processing sensitivity (SPS), a personality trait described as the tendency to deeply process environmental stimuli, is a psychological factor that may influence exercise participation. The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to examine relationships among SPS, exercise behavior, and preferred exercise intensity. Participants ( = 320) were college students and employees who completed the 12-Item Highly Sensitive Person Scale, the Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire, and a question related to preferred exercise intensity. Participants' ages ranged from 18 to 70 years ( = 39.36, = 15.15), and they were mostly female (69.6%). Most participants were physically active (77.5%). Mean SPS scores were not significantly different between active ( = 50.2, = 10.9) and insufficiently active ( = 51.4, = 9.97) participants; however, post hoc analysis revealed that the mean increase in SPS score from preference for vigorous intensity to light intensity (5.18, 95% CI [0.13, 10.2]) was statistically significant ( = 0.043). Exercise preferences are an important consideration for exercise adoption and adherence; thus, these findings have practical implications for exercise promotion, especially for individuals who score higher in SPS.

摘要

规律运动对整体健康很重要,但美国的运动参与率仍然很低。运动推广取决于识别可能影响运动参与的因素,如个性。感官加工敏感性(SPS)是一种被描述为深度加工环境刺激倾向的个性特质,是一个可能影响运动参与的心理因素。这项横断面研究的目的是检验SPS、运动行为和偏好运动强度之间的关系。参与者(n = 320)为大学生和员工,他们完成了12项高敏感人群量表、戈丁休闲时间运动问卷以及一个与偏好运动强度相关的问题。参与者年龄在18至70岁之间(M = 39.36,SD = 15.15),且大多数为女性(69.6%)。大多数参与者身体活跃(77.5%)。活跃参与者(M = 50.2,SD = 10.9)和运动不足参与者(M = 51.4, SD = 9.97)的平均SPS得分无显著差异;然而,事后分析显示,从偏好高强度运动到偏好低强度运动,SPS得分平均增加(5.18, 95% CI [0.13, 10.2])具有统计学意义(p = 0.043)。运动偏好是运动采纳和坚持的一个重要考虑因素;因此,这些发现对运动推广具有实际意义,尤其是对SPS得分较高的个体。

相似文献

1
Sensory Processing Sensitivity and Its Relation to Exercise Behavior and Preferred Exercise Intensity.感官加工敏感性及其与运动行为和偏好运动强度的关系。
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2025 Jan 3;10(1):18. doi: 10.3390/jfmk10010018.
2
Understanding the Relationship Between Attachment Orientation and Physical Activity Participation: An Exploratory Study.理解依恋取向与身体活动参与之间的关系:一项探索性研究。
J Phys Act Health. 2024 Jul 18;21(10):1019-1026. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2023-0717. Print 2024 Oct 1.
3
Being highly sensitive person negatively impacts on cognitive and psychosocial fatigue in multiple sclerosis patients: A cross-sectional, monocenter study.高度敏感个体对多发性硬化症患者认知和心理社会疲劳的负面影响:一项横断面、单中心研究。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2024 Oct;90:105769. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2024.105769. Epub 2024 Jul 14.
4
How needs and preferences of employees influence participation in health promotion programs: a six-month follow-up study.员工的需求和偏好如何影响健康促进项目的参与度:一项为期六个月的随访研究。
BMC Public Health. 2014 Dec 15;14:1277. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1277.
5
Physical activity in mild multiple sclerosis: contribution of perceived fatigue, energy cost, and speed of walking.轻度多发性硬化症患者的身体活动:感知疲劳、能量消耗和行走速度的贡献。
Disabil Rehabil. 2020 May;42(9):1240-1246. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1519603. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
6
Association of "Weekend Warrior" and Other Leisure Time Physical Activity Patterns With Risks for All-Cause, Cardiovascular Disease, and Cancer Mortality.“周末战士”和其他休闲时间体力活动模式与全因、心血管疾病和癌症死亡率风险的关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Mar 1;177(3):335-342. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.8014.
7
Emotion regulation goals and strategies among individuals with varying levels of sensory processing sensitivity: a latent profile analysis.不同感觉加工敏感性水平个体的情绪调节目标与策略:一项潜在剖面分析
Front Psychol. 2024 Apr 17;15:1364648. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1364648. eCollection 2024.
8
Subjective Sensitivity to Exteroceptive and Interoceptive processing in Highly Sensitive Person.高敏感人群对外感受性和内感受性加工的主观敏感性
Psychol Rep. 2024 Feb;127(1):142-158. doi: 10.1177/00332941221119403. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
9
Association of work-related and leisure-time physical activity with workplace food purchases, dietary quality, and health of hospital employees.工作相关和闲暇时间体力活动与医院员工工作场所食物购买、饮食质量和健康的关系。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Nov 27;19(1):1583. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7944-1.
10
Sensory Processing Sensitivity and Gastrointestinal Symptoms in Japanese Adults.日本人的感觉处理敏感性与胃肠道症状。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 11;19(16):9893. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19169893.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of accelerometer-based sedentary time and physical activity on DEXA-measured fat mass in 6059 children.基于加速度计的久坐时间和身体活动对 6059 名儿童 DEXA 测量体脂肪量的影响。
Nat Commun. 2023 Dec 12;14(1):8232. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-43316-w.
2
Physical activity motives, barriers, and preferences in people with obesity: A systematic review.肥胖人群的体力活动动机、障碍和偏好:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 23;16(6):e0253114. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253114. eCollection 2021.
3
Key Factors Associated with Adherence to Physical Exercise in Patients with Chronic Diseases and Older Adults: An Umbrella Review.与慢性病和老年人坚持身体锻炼相关的主要因素:伞式综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 19;18(4):2023. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18042023.
4
World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour.世界卫生组织 2020 年关于身体活动和 sedentary behaviour 的指南。
Br J Sports Med. 2020 Dec;54(24):1451-1462. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102955.
5
Objectively-Measured Light-Intensity Physical Activity and Risk of Cancer Mortality: A Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies.客观测量的光强度体力活动与癌症死亡率风险:前瞻性队列研究的荟萃分析。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020 May;29(5):1067-1073. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-1446. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
6
Observer-rated environmental sensitivity moderates children's response to parenting quality in early childhood.观察者评定的环境敏感性调节了儿童在幼儿期对父母教养质量的反应。
Dev Psychol. 2019 Nov;55(11):2389-2402. doi: 10.1037/dev0000795. Epub 2019 Aug 15.
7
Trends in Adherence to the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans for Aerobic Activity and Time Spent on Sedentary Behavior Among US Adults, 2007 to 2016.美国人进行有氧运动和久坐行为的体力活动指南的遵守趋势,美国成年人,2007 年至 2016 年。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jul 3;2(7):e197597. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.7597.
8
Dandelions, tulips and orchids: evidence for the existence of low-sensitive, medium-sensitive and high-sensitive individuals.蒲公英、郁金香和兰花:低敏感、中敏感和高敏感个体存在的证据。
Transl Psychiatry. 2018 Jan 22;8(1):24. doi: 10.1038/s41398-017-0090-6.
9
Environmental sensitivity in children: Development of the Highly Sensitive Child Scale and identification of sensitivity groups.儿童的环境敏感性:高度敏感儿童量表的发展与敏感性群体的识别。
Dev Psychol. 2018 Jan;54(1):51-70. doi: 10.1037/dev0000406. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
10
Systematic review of the relationships between objectively measured physical activity and health indicators in school-aged children and youth.学龄儿童和青少年客观测量的身体活动与健康指标之间关系的系统评价。
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016 Jun;41(6 Suppl 3):S197-239. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2015-0663.