• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年人在获得医疗和长期护理方面的社会经济不平等。

Socioeconomic Inequity in Access to Medical and Long-Term Care Among Older People.

作者信息

Okamoto Shohei, Yamada Atsuhiro, Kobayashi Erika, Liang Jersey

机构信息

Research Team for Social Participation and Healthy Aging, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute for Geriatrics and Gerontology, 35-2 Sakae-cho, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 1730015, Japan.

Faculty of Economics, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Int J Equity Health. 2025 Jan 23;24(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02345-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12939-024-02345-7
PMID:39849500
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11756124/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ensuring equitable access to medical and long-term care (LTC) is critical to enable older people to maintain their health and well-being even after they undergo a decline in their intrinsic capacity.

METHODS

We used data from five waves of the National Survey of the Japanese Elderly, conducted between 2002 and 2021, to assess gradients in access to medical care and LTC by income and education among Japanese individuals aged 60 years and above. Specifically, we assessed self-reported unmet needs for medical care and LTC, and public LTC use, and estimated the concentration indices (CI) to evaluate the degree of inequality and inequity. We standardised public LTC use by need and non-need variables. We analysed data derived from up to 1,775 person-wave observations from 1,370 individuals.

FINDINGS

The pooled incidence across waves of forgone medical care, self-reported unmet support for activities of daily living (ADL) or instrumental ADL (IADL), and those not certified for LTC services even with ADL or IADL limitations were 4.6%, 15.5%, and 62.5%, respectively. Public LTC use demonstrated pro-higher education and pro-rich distribution, whereas the gaps decreased for need-predicted use. Based on the CI estimates, no explicit inequality was found for forgone medical care. However, we observed inequity in standardised LTC use across education, indicating pro-higher education inequality, particularly among women and those aged ≥ 80 years.

CONCLUSION

Improving the understanding of available resources and strengthening the functions of health centres and communities are required to detect the needs of citizens and facilitate their access to necessary care.

摘要

背景

确保公平获得医疗和长期护理服务对于老年人即使在其内在能力下降后仍能保持健康和幸福至关重要。

方法

我们使用了2002年至2021年期间进行的五次日本老年人全国调查的数据,以评估60岁及以上日本个人在获得医疗保健和长期护理服务方面按收入和教育程度划分的梯度差异。具体而言,我们评估了自我报告的医疗保健和长期护理服务未满足需求、公共长期护理服务的使用情况,并估计了集中指数(CI)以评估不平等和不公平程度。我们根据需求和非需求变量对公共长期护理服务的使用情况进行了标准化。我们分析了来自1370名个体的多达1775人次观测数据。

结果

各轮调查中放弃医疗护理、自我报告的日常生活活动(ADL)或工具性ADL(IADL)未得到满足的支持,以及即使存在ADL或IADL限制也未获得长期护理服务认证的综合发生率分别为4.6%、15.5%和62.5%。公共长期护理服务的使用呈现出有利于高学历和高收入人群的分布,而需求预测使用方面的差距有所缩小。根据集中指数估计,放弃医疗护理方面未发现明显的不平等。然而,我们观察到标准化长期护理服务使用在教育程度方面存在不公平现象,表明存在有利于高学历人群的不平等,特别是在女性和80岁及以上人群中。

结论

需要提高对可用资源的认识,并加强健康中心和社区的功能,以发现公民的需求并促进他们获得必要的护理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3732/11756124/88981d93c26c/12939_2024_2345_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3732/11756124/4be46e767c29/12939_2024_2345_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3732/11756124/88981d93c26c/12939_2024_2345_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3732/11756124/4be46e767c29/12939_2024_2345_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3732/11756124/88981d93c26c/12939_2024_2345_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Socioeconomic Inequity in Access to Medical and Long-Term Care Among Older People.老年人在获得医疗和长期护理方面的社会经济不平等。
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Jan 23;24(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02345-7.
2
Socioeconomic Inequality in the Use of Long-Term Care among European Older Adults: An Empirical Approach Using the SHARE Survey.欧洲老年人长期护理利用中的社会经济不平等:使用 SHARE 调查的实证方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 22;18(1):20. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18010020.
3
Fairness and Eligibility to Long-Term Care: An Analysis of the Factors Driving Inequality and Inequity in the Use of Home Care for Older Europeans.长期护理的公平性与资格:对影响欧洲老年人家庭护理使用方面不平等和不公平的驱动因素的分析
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Oct 14;14(10):1224. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14101224.
4
Household Income Relationship With Health Services Utilization and Healthcare Expenditures in People Aged 75 Years or Older in Japan: A Population-Based Study Using Medical and Long-term Care Insurance Claims Data.日本 75 岁及以上老年人的家庭收入与卫生服务利用和医疗保健支出的关系:基于医疗和长期护理保险索赔数据的一项基于人群的研究。
J Epidemiol. 2019 Oct 5;29(10):377-383. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20180055. Epub 2018 Sep 22.
5
Examining the magnitude of inequality and inequity in use of healthcare resources among older Australians with cognitive decline.审视认知功能衰退的澳大利亚老年人在医疗资源使用方面的不平等和不公平程度。
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Mar 17;24(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02432-3.
6
Characterising Long Term Care Needs among Chinese Older Adults with Cognitive Impairment or ADL Limitations.中国认知障碍或日常生活活动受限老年人长期护理需求特征分析
J Cross Cult Gerontol. 2020 Mar;35(1):35-47. doi: 10.1007/s10823-019-09382-8.
7
Effective service coverage of long-term care among older persons in South Korea.韩国老年人长期护理的有效服务覆盖。
Age Ageing. 2023 Oct 28;52(Suppl 4):iv162-iv169. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afad120.
8
Horizontal inequity in the use and access to health care in Uruguay.乌拉圭医疗卫生服务利用和获取的水平不公平性。
Int J Equity Health. 2020 Oct 26;19(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01237-w.
9
Socioeconomic Inequalities in Home-Care Use Across Regional Long-term Care Systems in Europe.欧洲各地区长期照护系统中家庭护理使用的社会经济不平等。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2021 Jan 1;76(1):121-132. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbaa139.
10
Inequality in modern contraceptive use and unmet need for contraception among women of reproductive age in Zambia. A trend and decomposition analysis 2007-2018.赞比亚育龄妇女现代避孕方法使用情况及未满足的避孕需求的不平等。2007 - 2018年趋势与分解分析
Reprod Health. 2024 Dec 9;21(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12978-024-01909-8.

本文引用的文献

1
A systematic review and meta-analysis of unmet needs for healthcare and long-term care among older people.一项关于老年人医疗保健和长期护理未满足需求的系统评价与荟萃分析。
Health Econ Rev. 2022 Dec 9;12(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s13561-022-00398-4.
2
Towards universal health coverage in the context of population ageing: a narrative review on the implications from the long-term care system in Japan.人口老龄化背景下迈向全民健康覆盖:关于日本长期护理系统影响的叙述性综述
Arch Public Health. 2022 Sep 21;80(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s13690-022-00970-8.
3
Measuring health inequalities: a systematic review of widely used indicators and topics.
测量健康不平等:广泛使用的指标和主题的系统评价。
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Mar 10;20(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01397-3.
4
Socioeconomic Inequality in the Use of Long-Term Care among European Older Adults: An Empirical Approach Using the SHARE Survey.欧洲老年人长期护理利用中的社会经济不平等:使用 SHARE 调查的实证方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 22;18(1):20. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18010020.
5
Eligibility or use? Disentangling the sources of horizontal inequity in home care receipt in the Netherlands.资格还是使用?厘清荷兰家庭护理接受中的水平不公平来源。
Health Econ. 2020 Oct;29(10):1161-1179. doi: 10.1002/hec.4126. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
6
Equal long-term care for equal needs with universal and comprehensive coverage? An assessment using Dutch administrative data.平等需求的长期护理需要普遍和全面的覆盖吗?基于荷兰行政数据的评估。
Health Econ. 2020 Apr;29(4):435-451. doi: 10.1002/hec.3994. Epub 2020 Jan 20.
7
Measuring horizontal inequity in healthcare utilisation: a review of methodological developments and debates.测量医疗服务利用的水平不公平性:方法学发展与争议的综述。
Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Mar;21(2):171-180. doi: 10.1007/s10198-019-01118-2. Epub 2019 Sep 21.
8
Here comes the SUN: Self-assessed unmet need, worsening health outcomes, and health care inequity.来了:自我评价的未满足需求、健康状况恶化和医疗保健不平等。
Health Econ. 2019 Jun;28(6):727-735. doi: 10.1002/hec.3877. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
9
Determinants of first-time utilization of long-term care services in the Netherlands: an observational record linkage study.荷兰长期护理服务首次使用的决定因素:一项观察性记录链接研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Sep 5;17(1):626. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2570-z.
10
Are public subsidies effective to reduce emergency care? Evidence from the PLASA study.公共补贴是否能有效减少急救服务的使用?来自 PLASA 研究的证据。
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Aug;138:31-7. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.05.035. Epub 2015 May 23.