• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

测量健康不平等:广泛使用的指标和主题的系统评价。

Measuring health inequalities: a systematic review of widely used indicators and topics.

机构信息

Catalan Health System Observatory, Agència de Qualitat i Avaluació Sanitàries de Catalunya (AQuAS), 81-95 (2a planta), 08005, Barcelona, Spain.

CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Equity Health. 2021 Mar 10;20(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01397-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12939-021-01397-3
PMID:33691701
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7945367/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

According to many conceptual frameworks, the first step in the monitoring cycle of health inequalities is the selection of relevant topics and indicators. However, some difficulties may arise during this selection process due to a high variety of contextual factors that may influence this step. In order to help accomplish this task successfully, a comprehensive review of the most common topics and indicators for measuring and monitoring health inequalities in countries/regions with similar socioeconomic and political status as Catalonia was performed.

METHODS

We describe the processes and criteria used for selecting health indicators from reports, studies, and databases focusing on health inequalities. We also describe how they were grouped into well-known health topics. The topics were filtered and ranked by the number of indicators they accounted for.

RESULTS

We found 691 indicators used in the study of health inequalities. The indicators were grouped into 120 topics, 34 of which were selected for having five indicators or more. Most commonly found topics in the list include "Life expectancy", "Infant mortality", "Obesity and overweight (BMI)", "Mortality rate", "Regular smokers/tobacco consumption", "Self-perceived health", "Unemployment", "Mental well-being", "Cardiovascular disease/hypertension", "Socioeconomic status (SES)/material deprivation".

CONCLUSIONS

A wide variety of indicators and topics for the study of health inequalities exist across different countries and organisations, although there are some clear commonalities. Reviewing the use of health indicators is a key step to know the current state of the study of health inequalities and may show how to lead the way in understanding how to overcome them.

摘要

背景

根据许多概念框架,健康不平等监测周期的第一步是选择相关主题和指标。然而,由于可能影响这一步的各种背景因素,在选择过程中可能会出现一些困难。为了帮助成功完成这项任务,对与加泰罗尼亚具有相似社会经济和政治地位的国家/地区衡量和监测健康不平等的最常见主题和指标进行了全面审查。

方法

我们描述了从关注健康不平等的报告、研究和数据库中选择健康指标的过程和标准。我们还描述了如何将它们分组到知名的健康主题中。根据涵盖的指标数量对主题进行过滤和排序。

结果

我们发现了 691 个用于研究健康不平等的指标。这些指标被分为 120 个主题,其中 34 个被选中,因为它们有五个或更多的指标。列表中最常见的主题包括“预期寿命”、“婴儿死亡率”、“肥胖和超重(BMI)”、“死亡率”、“经常吸烟者/烟草消费”、“自我感知健康”、“失业”、“心理健康”、“心血管疾病/高血压”、“社会经济地位(SES)/物质匮乏”。

结论

尽管存在一些明显的共性,但不同国家和组织在研究健康不平等时存在各种各样的指标和主题。审查健康指标的使用是了解健康不平等研究现状的关键步骤,它可以显示如何引领理解如何克服这些不平等的道路。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e20c/7945367/837b1aa16ddb/12939_2021_1397_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e20c/7945367/837b1aa16ddb/12939_2021_1397_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e20c/7945367/837b1aa16ddb/12939_2021_1397_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Measuring health inequalities: a systematic review of widely used indicators and topics.测量健康不平等:广泛使用的指标和主题的系统评价。
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Mar 10;20(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01397-3.
2
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
3
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响父母和非正式照顾者对常规儿童疫苗接种看法和做法的因素:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 27;10(10):CD013265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013265.pub2.
4
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
5
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
6
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
7
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
8
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
9
Comparison of the effectiveness of inhaler devices in asthma and chronic obstructive airways disease: a systematic review of the literature.吸入装置在哮喘和慢性阻塞性气道疾病中的有效性比较:文献系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(26):1-149. doi: 10.3310/hta5260.
10
Community views on mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths: a qualitative evidence synthesis.社区对土壤传播蠕虫群体药物给药的看法:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 20;6:CD015794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015794.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Disease Burden of Autism Spectrum Disorder and Attention - Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in the 0-14 Age Group across 204 Countries and Regions from 1990 To 2021.1990年至2021年204个国家和地区0至14岁年龄组自闭症谱系障碍和注意力缺陷多动障碍的疾病负担
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2025 Jul 11. doi: 10.1007/s10578-025-01880-w.
2
Can medical consortiums bridge the gap in health inequity in China? A propensity score matching analysis.医疗联合体能否弥合中国医疗公平性的差距?一项倾向得分匹配分析。
Health Policy Plan. 2025 Aug 18;40(7):727-736. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czaf031.
3
Socioeconomic Inequity in Access to Medical and Long-Term Care Among Older People.

本文引用的文献

1
Towards a global monitoring system for implementing the Rio Political Declaration on Social Determinants of Health: developing a core set of indicators for government action on the social determinants of health to improve health equity.建立实施《关于社会决定因素的健康问题的里约政治宣言》全球监测系统:制定一套核心指标,供政府采取行动改善健康公平,应对社会决定因素对健康的影响。
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Sep 5;17(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0836-7.
2
Socioeconomic inequalities in health and the use of healthcare services in Catalonia: analysis of the individual data of 7.5 million residents.加泰罗尼亚的健康和医疗保健服务利用中的社会经济不平等:对 750 万居民个体数据的分析。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2018 Oct;72(10):871-879. doi: 10.1136/jech-2018-210817. Epub 2018 Aug 6.
3
老年人在获得医疗和长期护理方面的社会经济不平等。
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Jan 23;24(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02345-7.
4
A Nationwide Exploration of Social Inequalities in Cancer Mortality Amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic in Belgium.比利时新冠疫情期间癌症死亡率社会不平等现象的全国性探究。
Cancer Med. 2025 Jan;14(1):e70487. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70487.
5
Differential behaviour of a risk score for emergency hospital admission by demographics in Scotland-A retrospective study.苏格兰不同人口统计学特征人群急诊入院风险评分的差异行为——一项回顾性研究
PLOS Digit Health. 2024 Dec 17;3(12):e0000675. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000675. eCollection 2024 Dec.
6
Premature mortality analysis of 52,000 deceased cats and dogs exposes socioeconomic disparities.52000 只死亡猫犬的过早死亡率分析揭示了社会经济差异。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 20;14(1):28763. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-77385-8.
7
Finding the Right Setting for the Right Treatment During the Acute Treatment of Individuals with Schizophrenia: A Narrative Review and Clinical Practice Guideline.为精神分裂症患者急性治疗期间的正确治疗寻找合适环境:叙述性综述与临床实践指南
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2024 Jun 19;20:1293-1307. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S459450. eCollection 2024.
8
Health spillover studies of long-term care insurance in China: evidence from spousal caregivers from disabled families.中国长期护理保险的健康溢出效应研究:来自残疾家庭配偶照料者的证据。
Int J Equity Health. 2023 Sep 18;22(1):191. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-02001-6.
9
Roadmap for embedding health equity research into learning health systems.将健康公平研究纳入学习型卫生系统的路线图。
BMJ Lead. 2023 Dec 20;7(4):261-265. doi: 10.1136/leader-2022-000720.
10
Rural and urban differences in quality of dementia care of persons with dementia and caregivers across all domains: a systematic review.农村和城市在痴呆症患者和护理人员所有领域的痴呆症护理质量方面的差异:系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jan 31;23(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09100-8.
How obesity relates to socio-economic status: identification of eating behavior mediators.肥胖与社会经济地位的关系:饮食行为中介因素的识别
Int J Obes (Lond). 2016 Nov;40(11):1794-1801. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2016.109. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
4
Has health in Spain been declining since the economic crisis?自经济危机以来,西班牙的健康状况是否一直在下降?
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014 Mar;68(3):280-2. doi: 10.1136/jech-2013-202944. Epub 2013 Oct 23.
5
Does the effect of gender modify the relationship between deprivation and mortality?性别因素是否会改变贫困与死亡率之间的关系?
BMC Public Health. 2012 Jul 30;12:574. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-574.
6
[A proposal of policies and interventions to reduce social inequalities in health in Spain.Commission to Reduce Social Inequalities in Health in Spain].[关于减少西班牙健康领域社会不平等的政策与干预措施提案。西班牙健康领域社会不平等减少委员会]
Gac Sanit. 2012 Mar-Apr;26(2):182-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2011.07.024. Epub 2011 Nov 22.
7
Tackling the wider social determinants of health and health inequalities: evidence from systematic reviews.解决更广泛的健康社会决定因素和健康不平等问题:来自系统评价的证据。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010 Apr;64(4):284-91. doi: 10.1136/jech.2008.082743. Epub 2009 Aug 19.