• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

护理专业学生临床推理能力培养中的模拟实践:一项系统综述方案

Simulated practice in the development of clinical reasoning in nursing students: A systematic review protocol.

作者信息

Pires Rute, Marques Maria, Oliveira Henrique, Goes Margarida, Pedrosa Miguel, Lopes Manuel

机构信息

Unidade Local de Saúde do Alentejo Central, Programa de Prevenção e Controlo de Infeções e Resistência aos Antimicrobianos, Évora 7000-811, Portugal.

Departamento de Enfermagem, Universidade de Évora, Évora 7000-811, Portugal.

出版信息

MethodsX. 2024 Dec 28;14:103144. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2024.103144. eCollection 2025 Jun.

DOI:10.1016/j.mex.2024.103144
PMID:39850762
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11755088/
Abstract

is a pedagogical technique that replicates real-world scenarios in a controlled environment, enabling nursing students to engage in the teaching-learning process actively. While simulated practice is a growing pedagogical strategy, several studies have examined its strengths and limitations. However, evidence of its effectiveness in developing clinical reasoning skills among nursing students still needs to be improved. This systematic review aims to assess the benefits of simulated practice in enhancing the clinical reasoning skills of undergraduate nursing students. Methods: A systematic review will be conducted using three databases: CINAHL, MEDLINE, and PubMed. The search strategy will include MeSH terms "simulation," "nursing students," "nursing education," and "clinical reasoning." Inclusion criteria: Studies published within the last five years (2017-2022) involving undergraduate nursing students and using simulated practice as an intervention. Two independent reviewers will conduct Data extraction and synthesis, with disagreements resolved by a third reviewer, as follows:•Identify the benefits of simulated practice in clinical reasoning among nursing students.•Analyze studies that utilize simulated practice as an intervention.•Evaluate the effectiveness of simulated practice in developing clinical reasoning skills.

摘要

是一种教学技术,可在可控环境中复制真实场景,使护理专业学生能够积极参与教学过程。虽然模拟实践是一种日益流行的教学策略,但已有多项研究探讨了其优势和局限性。然而,其在培养护理专业学生临床推理能力方面的有效性证据仍有待完善。本系统评价旨在评估模拟实践在提高本科护理专业学生临床推理能力方面的益处。方法:将使用三个数据库进行系统评价:护理学与健康领域数据库(CINAHL)、医学文献数据库(MEDLINE)和医学期刊数据库(PubMed)。检索策略将包括医学主题词“模拟”“护理专业学生”“护理教育”和“临床推理”。纳入标准:过去五年(2017 - 2022年)发表的涉及本科护理专业学生且将模拟实践作为干预措施的研究。两名独立评审员将进行数据提取和综合,如有分歧由第三名评审员解决,具体如下:

•确定模拟实践在护理专业学生临床推理中的益处。

•分析将模拟实践作为干预措施的研究。

•评估模拟实践在培养临床推理能力方面的有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa4d/11755088/05f9f6e521f4/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa4d/11755088/05f9f6e521f4/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa4d/11755088/05f9f6e521f4/ga1.jpg

相似文献

1
Simulated practice in the development of clinical reasoning in nursing students: A systematic review protocol.护理专业学生临床推理能力培养中的模拟实践:一项系统综述方案
MethodsX. 2024 Dec 28;14:103144. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2024.103144. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
3
The effectiveness of using human patient simulation manikins in the teaching of clinical reasoning skills to undergraduate nursing students: a systematic review.使用人体模拟病人模型对本科护生进行临床推理技能教学的效果:一项系统综述
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2010;8(16):661-694. doi: 10.11124/01938924-201008160-00001.
4
The effectiveness of high-fidelity simulation on undergraduate nursing students' clinical reasoning-related skills: A systematic review.高保真模拟对本科护生临床推理相关技能的有效性:一项系统综述。
Nurse Educ Today. 2023 Feb;121:105679. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105679. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
5
The effect of Personal Digital Assistants in supporting the development of clinical reasoning in undergraduate nursing students: a systematic review.个人数字助理对本科护理专业学生临床推理能力发展的支持作用:一项系统综述。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2011;9(2):38-68. doi: 10.11124/01938924-201109020-00001.
6
Effectiveness of using simulation in the development of clinical reasoning in undergraduate nursing students: A systematic review.使用模拟在本科护生临床推理能力发展中的效果:系统评价。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2021 Nov;57:103220. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103220. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
7
Effectiveness and experience of arts-based pedagogy among undergraduate nursing students: a mixed methods systematic review.本科护理专业学生中基于艺术的教学法的有效性与经验:一项混合方法系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Nov;14(11):139-239. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003188.
8
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
9
Socioemotional Skills in the Teaching-Learning Process Mediated by Medium- and High-Fidelity Clinical Simulation in Nursing Students: Protocol for a Scoping Review.护理专业学生在中高仿真临床模拟教学-学习过程中的社会情感技能:系统评价方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Aug 19;13:e56436. doi: 10.2196/56436.
10
Developing student nurses' evaluative judgement in clinical practice tertiary education: A systematic scoping review of teaching and assessment methods.发展学生护士在临床实践高等教育中的评价判断能力:教学和评估方法的系统范围综述。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2023 Nov;73:103818. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103818. Epub 2023 Oct 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the BENEFITS-CCCSAT based on CTT and IRT: a cross-sectional design translation and validation study.基于经典测验理论和项目反应理论对中文版BENEFITS-CCCSAT进行心理测量学评估:一项横断面设计的翻译与验证研究。
Front Public Health. 2025 Mar 18;13:1532709. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1532709. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Learning effects of virtual versus high-fidelity simulations in nursing students: a crossover comparison.虚拟模拟与高保真模拟对护生的学习效果:一项交叉比较研究
BMC Nurs. 2022 Apr 27;21(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-00878-2.
2
Effects of high-fidelity simulation teaching on nursing students' knowledge, professional skills and clinical ability: A meta-analysis and systematic review.高保真模拟教学对护理学生知识、专业技能和临床能力的影响:荟萃分析和系统评价。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2022 Mar;60:103306. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103306. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
3
Clinical Decision-Making in Nursing Scale (CDMNS-PT©) in nursing students: translation and validation.
临床护理决策量表(CDMNS-PT©)在护理学生中的应用:翻译与验证。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2021 Sep 1;74(suppl 6):e20210032. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0032. eCollection 2021.
4
Clinical reasoning in nursing students: A concept analysis.护理学生的临床推理:概念分析。
Nurs Forum. 2021 Oct;56(4):1008-1014. doi: 10.1111/nuf.12628. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
5
Perceptions of senior nursing students regarding clinical decision-making.护理专业高年级学生对临床决策的看法。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2021 Apr 9;74(1):e20200921. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2020-0921. eCollection 2021.
6
Clinical judgment and diagnostic reasoning of nursing students in clinical simulation.护理学生在临床模拟中的临床判断和诊断推理。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2020 Sep 21;73(6):e20180878. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2018-0878. eCollection 2020.
7
Mapping clinical reasoning literature across the health professions: a scoping review.跨健康专业映射临床推理文献:范围综述。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Apr 7;20(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02012-9.
8
Challenges nurse educators experience with development of student nurses' clinical reasoning skills.护士教育者在培养护生临床推理能力方面所面临的挑战。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2019 Oct;40:102623. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2019.102623. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
9
Clinical Virtual Simulation in Nursing Education: Randomized Controlled Trial.护理教育中的临床虚拟模拟:随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Mar 18;21(3):e11529. doi: 10.2196/11529.
10
Knowing how we know: an epistemological rationale for the medical humanities.知道我们如何知道:医学人文学科的认识论基础
Med Educ. 2017 Jan;51(1):13-21. doi: 10.1111/medu.13147.