• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于经典测验理论和项目反应理论对中文版BENEFITS-CCCSAT进行心理测量学评估:一项横断面设计的翻译与验证研究。

Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the BENEFITS-CCCSAT based on CTT and IRT: a cross-sectional design translation and validation study.

作者信息

Li Chuang, Lin Youbei, Tosun Betul, Wang Pin, Guo Hong Ye, Ling Cheng Rong, Qi Ran, Luo Qing Yue, Wang Yan, Huang Fang, Wang Jiaqi, Ma Shu Hui, Xu Dan Feng, Wu Shu Zhen, Zhang Lan

机构信息

First Affiliated Hospital of Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, China.

School of Nursing, Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2025 Mar 18;13:1532709. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1532709. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1532709
PMID:40171423
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11960502/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The importance of culturally competent care in multicultural environments is increasingly recognized; however, effective tools to assess nursing students' cross-cultural competence remain limited. This study aimed to validate the BENEFITS-CCCSAT for Chinese nursing students.

METHODS

The original BENEFITS-CCCSAT was translated, back-translated, culturally adapted, and pre-tested using the Brislin model to form a Chinese version. A combined approach of classical test theory (CTT) and item response theory (IRT) was then used for multidimensional validation.

RESULTS

The CTT analysis showed that the C-BENEFITS-CCCSAT had a Cronbach's coefficient of 0.80, dimension reliability values ranging from 0.700 to 0.905, a test-retest reliability value of 0.881, and a scale-level content validity index (S-CVI) value of 0.928. The criterion-related validity value was 0.619. The confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) indicated a good model fit (CMIN/DF = 1.071, RMSEA = 0.08), with factor loadings ≥0.50. The Rasch analysis showed an item reliability value of 1, person reliability values ranging from 0.76 to 0.89, item separation index values ranging from 17.37 to 60.34, and person separation index values ranging from 1.76 to 2.89. The information-weighted fit statistic mean square (infit MNSQ) and outlier-sensitive fit statistic mean square (outfit MNSQ) values for all items ranged from 0.86 to 1.27. Overall, the scale demonstrated good reliability and validity for the Chinese nursing students.

CONCLUSION

The 25-item C-BENEFITS-CCCSAT demonstrates good reliability and validity and can be applied in educational settings to assess students' ability to provide culturally competent care. Future studies should test the scale in culturally diverse populations to further determine its applicability and generalizability.

摘要

背景

多元文化环境中具备文化胜任力护理的重要性日益得到认可;然而,评估护生跨文化胜任力的有效工具仍然有限。本研究旨在验证中国护生使用的BENEFITS - CCCSAT。

方法

采用 Brislin 模型对原始的 BENEFITS - CCCSAT 进行翻译、回译、文化调适和预测试,形成中文版。然后使用经典测试理论(CTT)和项目反应理论(IRT)相结合的方法进行多维度验证。

结果

CTT 分析表明,C - BENEFITS - CCCSAT 的 Cronbach's 系数为 0.80,维度信度值在 0.700 至 0.905 之间,重测信度值为 0.881,量表水平内容效度指数(S - CVI)值为 0.928。效标关联效度值为 0.619。验证性因素分析(CFA)表明模型拟合良好(CMIN/DF = 1.071,RMSEA = 0.08),因素载荷≥0.50。Rasch 分析显示项目信度值为 1,人员信度值在 0.76 至 0.89 之间,项目区分指数值在 17.37 至 60.34 之间,人员区分指数值在 1.76 至 2.89 之间。所有项目的信息加权拟合统计均方(infit MNSQ)和对异常值敏感的拟合统计均方(outfit MNSQ)值在 0.86 至 1.27 之间。总体而言,该量表对中国护生显示出良好的信度和效度。

结论

25 项的 C - BENEFITS - CCCSAT 显示出良好的信度和效度,可应用于教育环境中以评估学生提供具备文化胜任力护理的能力。未来研究应在文化多样的人群中测试该量表,以进一步确定其适用性和普遍性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27a1/11960502/dd0f1e0a9181/fpubh-13-1532709-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27a1/11960502/f3e3a92b7543/fpubh-13-1532709-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27a1/11960502/7549640e81db/fpubh-13-1532709-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27a1/11960502/dd0f1e0a9181/fpubh-13-1532709-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27a1/11960502/f3e3a92b7543/fpubh-13-1532709-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27a1/11960502/7549640e81db/fpubh-13-1532709-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27a1/11960502/dd0f1e0a9181/fpubh-13-1532709-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the BENEFITS-CCCSAT based on CTT and IRT: a cross-sectional design translation and validation study.基于经典测验理论和项目反应理论对中文版BENEFITS-CCCSAT进行心理测量学评估:一项横断面设计的翻译与验证研究。
Front Public Health. 2025 Mar 18;13:1532709. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1532709. eCollection 2025.
2
The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers.中文版的感知压力问卷:医学生和医务人员的编制与验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Mar 13;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01307-1.
3
The Chinese Version of the DigiHealthCom (Digital Health Competence) Instrument for Assessing Digital Health Competence of Health Care Professionals: Translation, Adaptation, and Validation Study.用于评估医疗保健专业人员数字健康能力的DigiHealthCom(数字健康能力)工具中文版:翻译、改编与验证研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Mar 21;12:e65373. doi: 10.2196/65373.
4
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the caregiver self-efficacy in contributing to patient self-care scale in China.中国患者自我护理贡献照顾者自我效能感量表的跨文化调适与验证。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jul 24;24(1):1977. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19534-2.
5
Psychometric evaluation of the study interest questionnaire-short form among Chinese nursing students based on classical test theory and item response theory.基于经典测验理论和项目反应理论对中国护理专业学生的学习兴趣问卷简版进行心理测量学评估。
BMC Nurs. 2024 Oct 7;23(1):717. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02390-1.
6
Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Patient Self-Advocacy Scale using classical test theory and item response theory.运用经典测试理论和项目反应理论对中文版患者自我维权量表进行心理测量学评估。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 26;15(1):6871. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-91129-2.
7
Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of Nursing Professional Values Scale (NPVS-3): A quantitative and cross-sectional design.中文版护理专业价值观量表(NPVS-3)的心理测量学评估:一项定量横断面设计。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2025 Mar;84:104325. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104325. Epub 2025 Mar 6.
8
Evaluation of reliability and validity regarding the Chinese version of Critical Cultural Competence Scale for clinical nurses.临床护士关键文化能力量表中文版的信度和效度评价。
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2022 Oct 28;47(10):1425-1434. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2022.210695.
9
Chinese version of the nursing students' perception of instructor caring (C-NSPIC): assessment of reliability and validity.护生对教师关怀感知量表中文版(C-NSPIC):信效度评估
Nurse Educ Today. 2013 Dec;33(12):1482-9. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2013.05.017. Epub 2013 Jun 19.
10
Health behavior inventory - short form: a Chinese validation study using classical test theory and item response theory.健康行为量表-简式中文版:基于经典测量理论和项目反应理论的验证性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 22;24(1):2281. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19774-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the sickness presenteeism scale- nurse (C-SPS-N): a cross-sectional study.中文版疾病出勤量表-护士版(C-SPS-N)的跨文化调适与心理测量学评价:一项横断面研究
BMC Nurs. 2025 May 7;24(1):494. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03113-w.

本文引用的文献

1
The Perceived Concerns of Nurse Educators' Use of GenAI in Nursing Education: Protocol for a Scoping Review.护士教育工作者在护理教育中使用生成式人工智能的感知担忧:一项范围综述的方案
Health Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 29;8(2):e70411. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70411. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Simulated practice in the development of clinical reasoning in nursing students: A systematic review protocol.护理专业学生临床推理能力培养中的模拟实践:一项系统综述方案
MethodsX. 2024 Dec 28;14:103144. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2024.103144. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Rasch analysis implementation in nursing research: A methodological approach.
拉施分析在护理研究中的应用:一种方法论途径。
Enferm Clin (Engl Ed). 2024 Nov-Dec;34(6):493-506. doi: 10.1016/j.enfcle.2024.11.009. Epub 2024 Nov 14.
4
Culturally responsive, trauma-informed, continuity of care(r) toolkits: A scoping review.文化响应、创伤知情、连续性关怀(r)工具包:范围综述。
Women Birth. 2024 Nov;37(6):101834. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2024.101834. Epub 2024 Nov 1.
5
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the nurses' attitudes towards communication with the patient scale among Chinese nurses.中文版护士对患者沟通态度量表在中国护士中的心理测量学特性
BMC Nurs. 2024 Oct 23;23(1):779. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02415-9.
6
Chinese version of the Physical Resilience Scale (PRS): reliability and validity test based on Rasch analysis.基于 Rasch 分析的物理韧性量表(PRS)中文版:信度和效度检验。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 18;24(1):2541. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19978-6.
7
Development and psychometric testing of the clinical adjustment scale for student nurses (CAS-SN): A scale for assessing student nurses' adaptation in clinical settings.临床适应量表(CAS-SN)用于评估护生临床适应状况的工具的编制及心理测量学特性研究
Nurse Educ Today. 2024 Nov;142:106350. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106350. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
8
Psychometric validation of Social Network Sites Use Motivation (SNSUM) Scale among Chinese adolescents and undergraduates.社交网站使用动机(SNSUM)量表在中国青少年和大学生中的心理测量学验证。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2024 Aug;248:104435. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104435. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
9
Validation of an Arabic tool for assessing vaccination literacy: A factor and Rasch analysis.评估疫苗接种素养的阿拉伯语工具的验证:因子和 Rasch 分析。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2024 Dec 31;20(1):2381297. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2381297. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
10
The public's perception of the nursing profession: Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the nursing image scale in Taiwan.公众对护理职业的看法:台湾护理形象量表中文版的效度和信度。
Nurs Health Sci. 2024 Sep;26(3):e13137. doi: 10.1111/nhs.13137.