Monjarás-Ávila Ana Josefina, Hardan Louis, Cuevas-Suárez Carlos Enrique, Alonso Norma Verónica Zavala, Fernández-Barrera Miguel Ángel, Moussa Carol, Jabr Jamal, Bourgi Rim, Haikel Youssef
Dental Materials Laboratory, Academic Area of Dentistry, Autonomous University of Hidalgo State, San Agustín Tlaxiaca 42160, Mexico.
Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Saint-Joseph University, Beirut 1107 2180, Lebanon.
Bioengineering (Basel). 2025 Jan 20;12(1):93. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12010093.
Dental caries is a widespread issue impacting global oral health. White spot lesions, the earliest stage of caries, compromise enamel's esthetics and integrity. Remineralization therapies, both fluoride and non-fluoride based, aim to restore enamel, but limited comparative data exist on their effects on lesion depth and microhardness. Thus, the aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy of remineralizing agents on lesion depth and microhardness of human teeth. The literature search included the following five databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Scielo, SCOPUS, and EMBASE from the period 2012 to October 2022. Studies evaluating lesion depth and microhardness in human teeth after the application of a remineralizing agent were considered for review. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 (The Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen, Denmark). A random effect model was used to pool estimate of effect and its 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for surface microhardness and depth lesion. Subgroup analyses were performed considering the presence of fluoride or not in the remineralization agent. Thirty-three studies were included in the qualitative review. Of these, twenty-six studies were included in the meta-analysis. The main risks of bias associated with the studies included a lack of blinding of the test operator and failure to obtain sample size. To conclude, fluorinated agents are more effective in remineralizing artificially induced white spot lesion than non-fluoride remineralizing agents.
龋齿是一个影响全球口腔健康的普遍问题。白斑病变作为龋齿的最早阶段,会损害牙釉质的美观和完整性。基于氟化物和非氟化物的再矿化疗法旨在修复牙釉质,但关于它们对病变深度和显微硬度影响的比较数据有限。因此,本系统评价的目的是评估再矿化剂对人牙齿病变深度和显微硬度的疗效。文献检索包括以下五个数据库:2012年至2022年10月期间的PubMed、科学网、Scielo、SCOPUS和EMBASE。评估再矿化剂应用后人牙齿病变深度和显微硬度的研究被纳入综述。使用RevMan 5.4(丹麦哥本哈根的Cochrane协作网)进行荟萃分析。采用随机效应模型汇总表面显微硬度和病变深度的效应估计值及其95%置信区间(CI)。根据再矿化剂中是否存在氟化物进行亚组分析。定性综述纳入了33项研究。其中,26项研究纳入了荟萃分析。与这些研究相关的主要偏倚风险包括测试操作人员缺乏盲法以及未获得样本量。总之,含氟剂在人工诱导的白斑病变再矿化方面比非氟化物再矿化剂更有效。