Guo Dongdong, Liu Chang, Zhu Hongkang, Cheng Yuliang, Huo Xiang, Guo Yahui, Qian He
State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Resources, School of Food Science and Technology, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China.
Key Laboratory of Pathogenic Microorganisms for Emerging and Outbreaks of Major Infectious Diseases, Jiangsu Engineering Research Centre for Health Emergency Response, Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing 210009, China.
Toxics. 2025 Jan 16;13(1):61. doi: 10.3390/toxics13010061.
Although food is essential for the survival of organisms, it can also trigger a variety of adverse reactions, ranging from nutrient intolerances to celiac disease and food allergies. Food not only contains essential nutrients but also includes numerous substances that may have positive or negative effects on the consuming organism. To protect against potentially harmful components, all animals have evolved defense mechanisms, which are similar to antimicrobial defenses but often come at the cost of the organism's health. When these defensive responses are exaggerated or misdirected, they can lead to adverse food reactions, where the costs outweigh the benefits. Furthermore, due to the persistent toxicity of harmful food components, the failure of defense mechanisms can also result in pathological effects triggered by food. This article review presents a food quality control framework that aims to clarify how these reactions relate to normal physiological processes. Organisms utilize several systems to coexist with symbiotic microbes, regulate them, and concurrently avoid, expel, or neutralize harmful pathogens. Similarly, food quality control systems allow organisms to absorb necessary nutrients while defending against low-quality or harmful components in food. Although many microbes are lethal in the absence of antimicrobial defenses, diseases related to microbiome dysregulation, such as inflammatory bowel disease, have significantly increased. Antitoxin defenses also come with costs and may fail due to insufficiencies, exaggerations, or misdirected actions, ultimately leading to adverse food reactions. With the changes in human diet and lifestyle, the failure of defense mechanisms has contributed to the rising incidence of food intolerances. This review explores the mechanisms of antitoxin defenses and analyzes how their failure can lead to adverse food reactions, emphasizing the importance of a comprehensive understanding of food quality control mechanisms for developing more effective treatments for food-triggered diseases.
尽管食物对生物体的生存至关重要,但它也可能引发各种不良反应,从营养不耐受到乳糜泻和食物过敏不等。食物不仅含有必需营养素,还包括许多可能对食用生物体产生正面或负面影响的物质。为了抵御潜在的有害成分,所有动物都进化出了防御机制,这些机制类似于抗菌防御,但往往以生物体的健康为代价。当这些防御反应被夸大或误导时,就会导致不良食物反应,此时代价超过了益处。此外,由于有害食物成分的持续毒性,防御机制的失效也会导致由食物引发的病理效应。本文综述提出了一个食物质量控制框架,旨在阐明这些反应与正常生理过程的关系。生物体利用多种系统与共生微生物共存、调节它们,同时避免、排出或中和有害病原体。同样,食物质量控制系统使生物体能够吸收必需营养素,同时抵御食物中的低质量或有害成分。尽管许多微生物在缺乏抗菌防御的情况下是致命的,但与微生物群失调相关的疾病,如炎症性肠病,却显著增加。抗毒素防御也有代价,可能由于不足、过度或误导性行动而失效,最终导致不良食物反应。随着人类饮食和生活方式的改变,防御机制的失效导致了食物不耐受发生率的上升。本综述探讨了抗毒素防御的机制,并分析了它们的失效如何导致不良食物反应,强调了全面理解食物质量控制机制对于开发更有效的食物引发疾病治疗方法的重要性。