• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Tracking Cognitive Spare Capacity During Speech Perception With EEG/ERP: Effects of Cognitive Load and Sentence Predictability.使用 EEG/ERP 追踪言语感知过程中的认知备用容量:认知负荷和句子可预测性的影响。
Ear Hear. 2020 Sep/Oct;41(5):1144-1157. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000856.
2
Extrinsic Cognitive Load Impairs Spoken Word Recognition in High- and Low-Predictability Sentences.外在认知负荷会影响高低预测度句子中的口语词汇识别。
Ear Hear. 2018 Mar/Apr;39(2):378-389. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000493.
3
Predictive Sentence Context Reduces Listening Effort in Older Adults With and Without Hearing Loss and With High and Low Working Memory Capacity.预测句子语境可减少有听力损失和无听力损失老年人以及高、低工作记忆能力者的听力努力。
Ear Hear. 2022;43(4):1164-1177. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001192. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
4
Dual-Task Accuracy and Response Time Index Effects of Spoken Sentence Predictability and Cognitive Load on Listening Effort.言语句子可预测性和认知负荷对听力努力度的双重任务准确性和反应时指数影响。
Trends Hear. 2021 Jan-Dec;25:23312165211018092. doi: 10.1177/23312165211018092.
5
In a Concurrent Memory and Auditory Perception Task, the Pupil Dilation Response Is More Sensitive to Memory Load Than to Auditory Stimulus Characteristics.在同时进行的记忆和听觉感知任务中,瞳孔扩张反应对记忆负荷的敏感性高于对听觉刺激特征的敏感性。
Ear Hear. 2019 Mar/Apr;40(2):272-286. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000612.
6
The costs (and benefits) of effortful listening on context processing: A simultaneous electrophysiology, pupillometry, and behavioral study.费力倾听对语境处理的成本(和收益):一项同时进行的电生理学、瞳孔测量和行为研究。
Cortex. 2021 Sep;142:296-316. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2021.06.007. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
7
Semantic Predictability Facilitates Comprehension of Degraded Speech in a Graded Manner.语义可预测性以渐进方式促进对退化语音的理解。
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 9;12:714485. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.714485. eCollection 2021.
8
The Effort of Repairing a Misperceived Word Can Impair Perception of Following Words, Especially for Listeners With Cochlear Implants.修复一个听错的单词的努力会损害对后续单词的感知,尤其是对植入人工耳蜗的听者而言。
Ear Hear. 2024;45(6):1527-1541. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001537. Epub 2024 Jun 18.
9
Speech Perception in Noise and Listening Effort of Older Adults With Nonlinear Frequency Compression Hearing Aids.老年人使用非线性频率压缩助听器的噪声言语感知和聆听努力。
Ear Hear. 2018 Mar/Apr;39(2):215-225. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000481.
10
Cognitive Spare Capacity as an Index of Listening Effort.认知备用能力作为听力努力程度的指标。
Ear Hear. 2016 Jul-Aug;37 Suppl 1:69S-76S. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000302.

引用本文的文献

1
Cortical mechanisms of across-ear speech integration investigated using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS).使用功能近红外光谱 (fNIRS) 研究跨耳语音整合的皮质机制。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 18;19(9):e0307158. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307158. eCollection 2024.
2
Effortful listening produces both enhancement and suppression of alpha in the EEG.专注倾听会使脑电图中的阿尔法波增强和抑制。
Audit Percept Cogn. 2023;6(3-4):289-299. doi: 10.1080/25742442.2023.2218239. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
3
Effect of spectral degradation on speech intelligibility and cortical representation.频谱退化对言语可懂度及皮层表征的影响。
Front Neurosci. 2024 Apr 5;18:1368641. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1368641. eCollection 2024.
4
Alpha-Band Dynamics of Hearing Aid Wearers Performing the Repeat-Recall Test (RRT).助听使用者执行重复回忆测试(RRT)时的 Alpha 波段动态。
Trends Hear. 2024 Jan-Dec;28:23312165231222098. doi: 10.1177/23312165231222098.
5
Allocation of cognitive resources in cognitive processing of rhythmic visual stimuli before gait-related motor initiation.在与步态相关的运动启动之前,对有节奏视觉刺激进行认知处理时认知资源的分配。
Front Neurosci. 2023 May 12;17:1145051. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1145051. eCollection 2023.
6
Combining Multiple Psychophysiological Measures of Listening Effort: Challenges and Recommendations.结合多种听力努力的心理生理测量方法:挑战与建议
Semin Hear. 2023 Mar 28;44(2):95-105. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1767669. eCollection 2023 May.
7
Measuring cognitive load of digital interface combining event-related potential and BubbleView.结合事件相关电位和气泡视图测量数字界面的认知负荷。
Brain Inform. 2023 Mar 3;10(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s40708-023-00187-7.
8
Listening Over Time: Single-Trial Tonic and Phasic Oscillatory Alpha-and Theta-Band Indicators of Listening-Related Fatigue.长期聆听:单次试验中与聆听相关疲劳的紧张性和相位性振荡α波和θ波指标
Front Neurosci. 2022 Jun 1;16:915349. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.915349. eCollection 2022.
9
Listening Effort Informed Quality of Experience Evaluation.基于聆听努力的体验质量评估
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 5;12:767840. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.767840. eCollection 2021.
10
Dual-Task Accuracy and Response Time Index Effects of Spoken Sentence Predictability and Cognitive Load on Listening Effort.言语句子可预测性和认知负荷对听力努力度的双重任务准确性和反应时指数影响。
Trends Hear. 2021 Jan-Dec;25:23312165211018092. doi: 10.1177/23312165211018092.

本文引用的文献

1
The Pupil Dilation Response to Auditory Stimuli: Current State of Knowledge.听觉刺激的瞳孔扩张反应:现有知识状况。
Trends Hear. 2018 Jan-Dec;22:2331216518777174. doi: 10.1177/2331216518777174.
2
Semantic context improves speech intelligibility and reduces listening effort for listeners with hearing impairment.语义上下文可提高听力受损者的言语可懂度并减少其听力负担。
Int J Audiol. 2018 Jul;57(7):483-492. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2018.1432901. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
3
The Association Between Cognitive Performance and Speech-in-Noise Perception for Adult Listeners: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.成人听力言语感知与认知表现的关系:系统文献回顾和荟萃分析。
Trends Hear. 2017 Jan-Dec;21:2331216517744675. doi: 10.1177/2331216517744675.
4
Extrinsic Cognitive Load Impairs Spoken Word Recognition in High- and Low-Predictability Sentences.外在认知负荷会影响高低预测度句子中的口语词汇识别。
Ear Hear. 2018 Mar/Apr;39(2):378-389. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000493.
5
Objective Assessment of Listening Effort: Coregistration of Pupillometry and EEG.客观评估听力努力程度:瞳孔测量与 EEG 的配准。
Trends Hear. 2017 Jan-Dec;21:2331216517706396. doi: 10.1177/2331216517706396.
6
The Human Neural Alpha Response to Speech is a Proxy of Attentional Control.人类对语音的神经阿尔法反应是注意力控制的一种替代指标。
Cereb Cortex. 2017 Jun 1;27(6):3307-3317. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhx074.
7
Cortical Alpha Oscillations Predict Speech Intelligibility.皮质阿尔法振荡可预测言语清晰度。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Feb 24;11:88. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00088. eCollection 2017.
8
Effects of Hearing Impairment and Hearing Aid Amplification on Listening Effort: A Systematic Review.听力障碍及助听器放大对聆听努力的影响:一项系统综述
Ear Hear. 2017 May/Jun;38(3):267-281. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000396.
9
Behavioral Assessment of Listening Effort Using a Dual-Task Paradigm.使用双任务范式评估听力努力程度。
Trends Hear. 2017 Jan;21:2331216516687287. doi: 10.1177/2331216516687287.
10
Rapid Release From Listening Effort Resulting From Semantic Context, and Effects of Spectral Degradation and Cochlear Implants.语义语境导致聆听努力的快速释放,以及频谱劣化和人工耳蜗的影响。
Trends Hear. 2016 Oct 3;20:2331216516669723. doi: 10.1177/2331216516669723.

使用 EEG/ERP 追踪言语感知过程中的认知备用容量:认知负荷和句子可预测性的影响。

Tracking Cognitive Spare Capacity During Speech Perception With EEG/ERP: Effects of Cognitive Load and Sentence Predictability.

机构信息

Speech Perception, Cognition, and Hearing Laboratory, Department of Speech-Language-Hearing: Sciences and Disorders, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.

Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute - TL1 Program.

出版信息

Ear Hear. 2020 Sep/Oct;41(5):1144-1157. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000856.

DOI:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000856
PMID:32282402
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8784007/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Listening to speech in adverse listening conditions is effortful. Objective assessment of cognitive spare capacity during listening can serve as an index of the effort needed to understand speech. Cognitive spare capacity is influenced both by signal-driven demands posed by listening conditions and top-down demands intrinsic to spoken language processing, such as memory use and semantic processing. Previous research indicates that electrophysiological responses, particularly alpha oscillatory power, may index listening effort. However, it is not known how these indices respond to memory and semantic processing demands during spoken language processing in adverse listening conditions. The aim of the present study was twofold: first, to assess the impact of memory demands on electrophysiological responses during recognition of degraded, spoken sentences, and second, to examine whether predictable sentence contexts increase or decrease cognitive spare capacity during listening.

DESIGN

Cognitive demand was varied in a memory load task in which young adult participants (n = 20) viewed either low-load (one digit) or high-load (seven digits) sequences of digits, then listened to noise-vocoded spoken sentences that were either predictable or unpredictable, and then reported the final word of the sentence and the digits. Alpha oscillations in the frequency domain and event-related potentials in the time domain of the electrophysiological data were analyzed, as was behavioral accuracy for both words and digits.

RESULTS

Measured during sentence processing, event-related desynchronization of alpha power was greater (more negative) under high load than low load and was also greater for unpredictable than predictable sentences. A complementary pattern was observed for the P300/late positive complex (LPC) to sentence-final words, such that P300/LPC amplitude was reduced under high load compared with low load and for unpredictable compared with predictable sentences. Both words and digits were identified more quickly and accurately on trials in which spoken sentences were predictable.

CONCLUSIONS

Results indicate that during a sentence-recognition task, both cognitive load and sentence predictability modulate electrophysiological indices of cognitive spare capacity, namely alpha oscillatory power and P300/LPC amplitude. Both electrophysiological and behavioral results indicate that a predictive sentence context reduces cognitive demands during listening. Findings contribute to a growing literature on objective measures of cognitive demand during listening and indicate predictable sentence context as a top-down factor that can support ease of listening.

摘要

目的

在不利的听力条件下听言语需要付出努力。对听力过程中认知剩余容量的客观评估可用作理解言语所需努力的指标。认知剩余容量既受听力条件下信号驱动需求的影响,也受口语处理内在的自上而下需求的影响,如记忆使用和语义处理。先前的研究表明,电生理反应,特别是α振荡功率,可能反映听力努力。然而,尚不清楚这些指标如何响应记忆和语义处理在不利听力条件下处理口语时的需求。本研究的目的有两个:首先,评估记忆需求对识别退化语音句子时电生理反应的影响;其次,研究可预测的句子语境是否会增加或减少听力过程中的认知剩余容量。

设计

在一项记忆负荷任务中,改变认知需求,让年轻成年参与者(n=20)观看低负荷(一位数字)或高负荷(七位数字)的数字序列,然后听噪声编码的语音句子,这些句子是可预测的还是不可预测的,然后报告句子的最后一个单词和数字。分析了电生理数据的频域α振荡和时域事件相关电位,以及单词和数字的行为准确性。

结果

在句子处理过程中测量,高负荷时α功率的事件相关去同步化(即更负)大于低负荷,不可预测句子时也大于可预测句子。对于句子末尾单词的 P300/晚期正复合(LPC)也观察到了互补模式,即高负荷时 P300/LPC 振幅比低负荷时小,不可预测时比可预测时小。在语音句子可预测的情况下,单词和数字的识别速度更快、准确性更高。

结论

结果表明,在句子识别任务中,认知负荷和句子可预测性都调节认知剩余容量的电生理指标,即α振荡功率和 P300/LPC 振幅。电生理和行为结果都表明,可预测的句子语境减少了听力过程中的认知需求。研究结果为听力过程中认知需求的客观测量的不断增长的文献做出了贡献,并表明可预测的句子语境是一种自上而下的因素,可以支持听力的轻松程度。