Liot F, Hatzfeld C
Rev Fr Mal Respir. 1979 Jul-Aug;7(4):401-7.
It is generally agreed that one assisted ventilation session has direct effects in chronic respiratory insufficiencies (C.R.I.) of chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases: hyperventilation where PaCO2 decreases and PaO2 increases, diminution of ventilatory work, reduction of cardiac output. Less is known, however, about the action on V and Q distribution and mechanics of breathing. The return to control values occurs quite rapidly after the end of the session. Long-term effects are much more questionable. Many publications in English have concluded that ona long-term basis, patients do not benefit from intermittent positive pressure. But, the daily assisted ventilation sessions usually lasted only a short time (1 h-1 h 30 in several sessions). According to a number of publications in French, assistance prolonged for several hours seems effective (decrease in the number of acute failures, annual hospitalization duration, more prolonged survival). However, a tracheostomy which enables assistance at night is often required. Results seem encouraging in the treatment of severe restrictive insufficiencies and particularly in the case of cyphoscoliotic patients. On the other hand, it is more difficult to draw a conclusion concerning chronic obstructive patients and further comparative studies are necessary in this direction.
人们普遍认为,一次辅助通气对慢性阻塞性肺疾病的慢性呼吸功能不全(C.R.I.)有直接影响:过度通气使动脉血二氧化碳分压(PaCO2)降低、动脉血氧分压(PaO2)升高,通气功减少,心输出量降低。然而,对于其对通气/血流比值(V/Q)分布及呼吸力学的作用了解较少。通气结束后,各项指标很快会恢复到对照值。长期效果则更值得怀疑。许多英文出版物得出结论,从长期来看,患者无法从间歇正压通气中获益。但是,日常的辅助通气疗程通常持续时间较短(几个疗程中每次为1小时 - 1个半小时)。根据一些法语出版物的说法,延长至数小时的辅助通气似乎有效(急性发作次数减少、年度住院时长缩短、生存期延长)。然而,通常需要进行气管切开术以便在夜间进行辅助通气。在治疗严重的限制性呼吸功能不全时,尤其是脊柱后侧凸患者,结果似乎令人鼓舞。另一方面,对于慢性阻塞性肺病患者很难得出结论,因此有必要在这方面开展进一步的对比研究。