• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
[Development and validation of a clinical automatic diagnosis system based on diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders].基于颞下颌关节紊乱病诊断标准的临床自动诊断系统的开发与验证
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2025 Feb 18;57(1):192-201. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2025.01.029.
2
Does Temporomandibular Joint Magnetic Resonance Imaging Diagnosis Support Clinical Examination Diagnosis Following Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders?颞下颌关节磁共振成像诊断是否支持根据颞下颌关节紊乱病的诊断标准进行临床检查诊断?
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023 Jul;81(7):813-819. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2023.03.007. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
3
Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) for Clinical and Research Applications: recommendations of the International RDC/TMD Consortium Network* and Orofacial Pain Special Interest Group†.颞下颌关节紊乱病(DC/TMD)的诊断标准(临床与研究用):国际 RDC/TMD 联合会*和口腔颌面痛特别兴趣小组†的推荐标准。
J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2014 Winter;28(1):6-27. doi: 10.11607/jop.1151.
4
The Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders. V: methods used to establish and validate revised Axis I diagnostic algorithms.颞下颌关节紊乱病研究诊断标准。V:用于建立和验证修订后的轴I诊断算法的方法。
J Orofac Pain. 2010 Winter;24(1):63-78.
5
Diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (DC/TMD): interexaminer reliability of the Finnish version of Axis I clinical diagnoses.颞下颌关节紊乱病诊断标准(DC/TMD):芬兰版轴 I 临床诊断的检查者间可靠性。
J Oral Rehabil. 2017 Jul;44(7):493-499. doi: 10.1111/joor.12516. Epub 2017 May 6.
6
Interexaminer reliability of the German version of the DC/TMD.德式头痛问卷(DC/TMD)德语版的评估者间信度。
J Oral Rehabil. 2021 Jan;48(1):28-34. doi: 10.1111/joor.13054. Epub 2020 Nov 6.
7
Telediagnosis as an effective tool for assessment temporomandibular disorders.远程诊断作为评估颞下颌关节紊乱的有效工具。
J Oral Rehabil. 2024 Sep;51(9):1794-1804. doi: 10.1111/joor.13760. Epub 2024 May 31.
8
The Research Diagnostic Criteria For Temporomandibular Disorders. II: reliability of Axis I diagnoses and selected clinical measures.颞下颌关节紊乱病研究诊断标准。II:I轴诊断及选定临床测量指标的可靠性
J Orofac Pain. 2010 Winter;24(1):25-34.
9
Diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: Diagnostic accuracy for general dentistry procedure without mandatory commands regarding myalgia, arthralgia and headache attributed to temporomandibular disorder.颞下颌关节紊乱病的诊断标准:针对一般牙科程序的诊断准确性,不包括对颞下颌关节紊乱病所致肌痛、关节痛和头痛的强制指令。
J Oral Rehabil. 2018 Jul;45(7):497-503. doi: 10.1111/joor.12643. Epub 2018 May 18.
10
DC/TMD Axis I diagnostic subtypes in TMD patients from Confucian heritage cultures: a stratified reporting framework.从儒家文化传统的 TMD 患者中区分 DC/TMD 轴 I 诊断亚型:分层报告框架。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Aug;27(8):4459-4470. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05067-2. Epub 2023 May 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Accuracy of temporomandibular disorders diagnosis evaluated through the diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorder (DC/TDM) Axis II compared to the Axis I evaluations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.通过颞下颌关节紊乱病诊断标准(DC/TDM)轴II评估与轴I评估相比的颞下颌关节紊乱病诊断准确性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Mar 2;24(1):299. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-03983-7.
2
TMJ degenerative joint disease: relationships between CBCT findings, clinical symptoms, and signs.颞下颌关节退行性关节病:锥形束计算机断层扫描结果、临床症状及体征之间的关系
Acta Odontol Scand. 2023 Oct;81(7):562-568. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2023.2215317. Epub 2023 May 21.
3
Temporomandibular Joint: Review of Anatomy and Clinical Implications.颞下颌关节:解剖学回顾与临床意义
Dent Clin North Am. 2023 Apr;67(2):199-209. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2022.11.003. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
4
Review of the studies on the relationship and treatment of anterior disk displacement and dentofacial deformity in adolescents.青少年前盘移位与牙颌面畸形的关系及治疗研究述评。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2023 Apr;135(4):470-474. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2022.07.018. Epub 2022 Aug 7.
5
Breast cancer detection using deep learning: Datasets, methods, and challenges ahead.深度学习在乳腺癌检测中的应用:数据集、方法和未来的挑战。
Comput Biol Med. 2022 Oct;149:106073. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.106073. Epub 2022 Aug 31.
6
Oral health-related quality of life of patients with acute and chronic temporomandibular disorder diagnostic subtypes.急性和慢性颞下颌关节紊乱病诊断亚型患者的口腔健康相关生活质量。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2022 Jan;153(1):50-58. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2021.07.011. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
7
Artificial intelligence in detecting temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis on orthopantomogram.口腔全景片中人工智能检测颞下颌关节骨关节炎。
Sci Rep. 2021 May 13;11(1):10246. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89742-y.
8
Prevalence of temporomandibular joint disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.颞下颌关节紊乱患病率的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Feb;25(2):441-453. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03710-w. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
9
Occlusion, orthodontics, and temporomandibular disorders: Cutting edge of the current evidence.阻塞、正畸和颞下颌关节紊乱:当前证据的前沿。
J World Fed Orthod. 2020 Oct;9(3S):S15-S18. doi: 10.1016/j.ejwf.2020.08.003. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
10
Automated Detection of TMJ Osteoarthritis Based on Artificial Intelligence.基于人工智能的 TMJ 骨关节炎自动检测。
J Dent Res. 2020 Nov;99(12):1363-1367. doi: 10.1177/0022034520936950. Epub 2020 Jul 1.

基于颞下颌关节紊乱病诊断标准的临床自动诊断系统的开发与验证

[Development and validation of a clinical automatic diagnosis system based on diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders].

作者信息

Fang Yuanyuan, Xu Fan, Lei Jie, Zhang Hao, Zhang Wenyu, Sun Yu, Wu Hongxin, Fu Kaiyuan, Mao Weiyu

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Center for TMD & Orofacial Pain, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Center for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomato-logy, Beijing 100081, China.

LargeV Instrument Corp. Ltd., Beijing 100084, China.

出版信息

Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2025 Feb 18;57(1):192-201. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2025.01.029.

DOI:10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2025.01.029
PMID:39856527
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11759806/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop a clinical automated diagnostic system for temporomandibular disorders (TMD) based on the diagnostic criteria for TMD (DC/TMD) to assist dentists in making rapid and accurate clinical diagnosis of TMD.

METHODS

Clinical and imaging data of 354 patients, who visited the Center for TMD & Orofacial Pain at Peking University Hospital of Stomatology from September 2023 to January 2024, were retrospectively collected. The study developed a clinical automated diagnostic system for TMD using the DC/TMD, built on the. NET Framework platform with branching statements as its internal structure. Further validation of the system on consistency and diagnostic efficacy compared with DC/TMD were also explored. Diagnostic efficacy of the TMD clinical automated diagnostic system for degenerative joint diseases, disc displacement with reduction, disc displacements without reduction with limited mouth opening and disc displacement without reduction without limited mouth opening was evaluated and compared with a specialist in the field of TMD. Accuracy, precision, specificity and the Kappa value were assessed between the TMD clinical automated diagnostic system and the specialist.

RESULTS

Diagnoses for various TMD subtypes, including pain-related TMD (arthralgia, myalgia, headache attributed to TMD) and intra-articular TMD (disc displacement with reduction, disc displacement with reduction with intermittent locking, disc displacement without reduction with limited opening, disc displacement without reduction without limited opening, degenerative joint disease and subluxation), using the TMD clinical automated diagnostic system were completely identical to those obtained by the TMD specialist based on DC/TMD. Both the system and the expert showed low sensitivity for diagnosing degenerative joint disease (0.24 and 0.37, respectively), but high specificity (0.96). Both methods achieved high accuracy (> 0.9) for diagnosing disc displacements with reduction and disc displacements without reduction with limited mouth opening. The sensitivity for diagnosing disc displacement without reduction without limited mouth opening was only 0.59 using the automated system, lower than the expert (0.87), while both had high specificity (0.92). The Kappa values for most TMD subtypes were close to 1, except the disc displacement without reduction without limited mouth opening, which had a Kappa value of 0.68.

CONCLUSION

This study developed and validated a reliable clinical automated diagnostic system for TMD based on DC/TMD. The system is designed to facilitate the rapid and accurate diagnosis and classification of TMD, and is expected to be an important tool in clinical scenarios.

摘要

目的

基于颞下颌关节紊乱病(TMD)的诊断标准(DC/TMD)开发一种临床自动诊断系统,以协助牙医对TMD进行快速准确的临床诊断。

方法

回顾性收集2023年9月至2024年1月在北京口腔医院颞下颌关节病及口颌面疼痛中心就诊的354例患者的临床和影像数据。本研究使用DC/TMD开发了一种用于TMD的临床自动诊断系统,该系统基于.NET框架平台构建,内部结构采用分支语句。还探讨了该系统与DC/TMD在一致性和诊断效能方面的进一步验证。评估了TMD临床自动诊断系统对退行性关节疾病、可复性盘移位、不可复性盘移位伴张口受限和不可复性盘移位不伴张口受限的诊断效能,并与TMD领域的专家进行比较。评估了TMD临床自动诊断系统与专家之间的准确性、精确性、特异性和Kappa值。

结果

使用TMD临床自动诊断系统对各种TMD亚型的诊断,包括疼痛相关的TMD(关节痛、肌痛、归因于TMD的头痛)和关节内TMD(可复性盘移位、可复性盘移位伴间歇性绞锁、不可复性盘移位伴张口受限、不可复性盘移位不伴张口受限、退行性关节疾病和半脱位),与TMD专家基于DC/TMD得出的诊断完全相同。该系统和专家对退行性关节疾病的诊断敏感性均较低(分别为0.24和0.37),但特异性较高(0.96)。两种方法对可复性盘移位和不可复性盘移位伴张口受限的诊断准确性均较高(>0.9)。使用自动系统对不可复性盘移位不伴张口受限的诊断敏感性仅为0.59,低于专家(0.87),而两者的特异性均较高(0.92)。除不可复性盘移位不伴张口受限的Kappa值为0.68外,大多数TMD亚型的Kappa值接近1。

结论

本研究开发并验证了一种基于DC/TMD的可靠的TMD临床自动诊断系统。该系统旨在促进TMD的快速准确诊断和分类,有望成为临床场景中的重要工具。