Aidar Felipe J, Santos Wélia Yasmin Horacio Dos, Machado Saulo da Cunha, Nunes-Silva Albená, Vieira Érica Leandro Marciano, Valenzuela Pérez Diego Ignácio, Aedo-Muñoz Esteban, Brito Ciro José, Nikolaidis Pantelis T
Graduate Program in Movement Science, Federal University of Sergipe (UFS), São Cristovão 49107-230, SE, Brazil.
Group of Studies and Research of Performance, Sport, Health and Paralympic Sports-GEPEPS, The Federal University of Sergipe-UFS, São Cristovão 49107-230, SE, Brazil.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Jan 18;22(1):122. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22010122.
(1) Background: The recovery method is important and decisive in the training system. This study aimed to assess the effects of various post-training recovery methods on muscle damage and strength indicators in Paralympic powerlifting athletes. (2) Methods: A crossover study was conducted involving eleven male athletes (25.4 ± 3.3 years, 70.3 ± 12.1 kg). Muscle damage was assessed using blood biochemical markers (cytokines IL-6, IL-10, and TNF-α) and isometric force indicators, including the maximum isometric force (MIF), time to MIF, and Rate of Force Development. The following assessments were performed before, immediately after, and at 24 and 48 h after the recovery protocol: (a) passive recovery (RP) or (b) cold-water immersion (CWI). (3) Results: The main results indicated that maximum isometric force (MIF) significantly improved after 48 h of CWI application ( < 0.05; for all comparison). The analysis of biochemical markers did not yield significant differences between the recovery methods at different time points ( > 0.05). For IL-6, there were significant differences between CWI before (2.29 ± 1.08, 95% CI 1.57-3.01) and CWI 2 h later (2 h) (4.59 ± 2.96, 95% CI 2.60-6.57; = 0.045), and between CWI 15 min later (15 min) (4.14 ± 2.24, 95% CI 2.63-5.64) and CWI 48 h later (48 h) (2.33 ± 1.25, 95% CI 1.49-3.17; = 0.034). There were differences between CWI 2 h (4.14 ± 2.24, 95% CI 2.63-5.64) and CWI 48 h later (2.33 ± 1.25, 95% CI 1.49-3.17; = 0.035; F = 9.202; ηp = 0.479; high effect). (4) Conclusions: CWI significantly improved the post-resistance training muscle damage and strength in Paralympic powerlifting athletes.
(1) 背景:恢复方法在训练体系中至关重要且具有决定性作用。本研究旨在评估残奥会举重运动员训练后采用不同恢复方法对肌肉损伤和力量指标的影响。(2) 方法:进行了一项交叉研究,涉及11名男性运动员(25.4±3.3岁,70.3±12.1千克)。使用血液生化标志物(细胞因子IL - 6、IL - 10和TNF -α)和等长力量指标评估肌肉损伤,等长力量指标包括最大等长力量(MIF)、达到MIF的时间以及力量发展速率。在恢复方案实施前、刚结束后以及24小时和48小时进行以下评估:(a) 被动恢复(RP)或(b) 冷水浸泡(CWI)。(3) 结果:主要结果表明,应用CWI 48小时后最大等长力量(MIF)显著改善(<0.05;所有比较均如此)。生化标志物分析在不同时间点的恢复方法之间未产生显著差异(>0.05)。对于IL - 6,CWI前(2.29±1.08,95%可信区间1.57 - 3.01)与CWI 2小时后(2小时)(4.59±2.96,95%可信区间2.60 - 6.57; = 0.045)之间存在显著差异,CWI 15分钟后(15分钟)(4.14±2.24,95%可信区间2.63 - 5.64)与CWI 48小时后(48小时)(2.33±1.25,95%可信区间1.49 - 3.17; = 0.034)之间存在差异。CWI 2小时(4.14±2.24,95%可信区间2.63 - 5.64)与CWI 48小时后(2.33±1.25,95%可信区间1.49 - 3.17)之间存在差异( = 0.035;F = 9.202;ηp = 0.479;效果显著)。(4) 结论:冷水浸泡显著改善了残奥会举重运动员抗阻训练后的肌肉损伤和力量。