Dinescu Venera Cristina, Bica Marius, Vasile Ramona Constantina, Gresita Andrei, Catalin Bogdan, Rotaru-Zavaleanu Alexandra Daniela, Vreju Florentin Ananu, Sas Lorena, Bunescu Marius
Department of Health Promotion and Occupational Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 2 Petru Rares Str., 200349 Craiova, Romania.
Department of Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 2 Petru Rares Str., 200349 Craiova, Romania.
Life (Basel). 2025 Jan 20;15(1):132. doi: 10.3390/life15010132.
: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a common peripheral neuropathy, often assessed using the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ). The BCTQ evaluates symptom severity (SSS) and functional status (FSS) but has limitations in stratifying CTS severity, particularly in severe cases. : This study aimed to evaluate the utility of the BCTQ in a homogeneous cohort of female workers engaged in repetitive manual tasks, exploring its correlation with objective clinical measures and its performance in detecting CTS severity. : A cross-sectional study was conducted on 24 right-hand-dominant female workers with repetitive occupational tasks. CTS diagnosis was confirmed via clinical and electrodiagnostic criteria. Subjects completed the BCTQ, and correlations between BCTQ scores and objective measures such as median nerve cross-sectional area and nerve conduction studies were analyzed. Statistical analyses included comparisons across CTS severity groups and subgroup evaluations based on age and tenure. : The BCTQ demonstrated moderate correlations with objective measures, with a strong correlation between SSS and FSS scores (r = 0.86, < 0.001). However, the sensitivity of the SSS and FSS was limited, particularly for severe CTS cases. Paradoxically lower scores in severe cases may reflect questionnaire limitations or adaptive responses. Targeted questions addressing pain and sensory symptoms showed better sensitivity (>80%) and may guide clinicians in identifying slight CTS cases. : While the BCTQ remains a valuable tool for assessing CTS, its limitations necessitate complementary use of objective diagnostic tools, particularly for severe cases. Future refinements, such as tailored scoring systems and integration with clinical measures, could enhance its diagnostic utility and ensure comprehensive assessment of CTS severity.
腕管综合征(CTS)是一种常见的周围神经病变,通常使用波士顿腕管问卷(BCTQ)进行评估。BCTQ评估症状严重程度(SSS)和功能状态(FSS),但在对CTS严重程度进行分层方面存在局限性,尤其是在严重病例中。本研究旨在评估BCTQ在从事重复性手工任务的女性工人同质队列中的效用,探讨其与客观临床指标的相关性以及在检测CTS严重程度方面的表现。对24名惯用右手且从事重复性职业任务的女性工人进行了一项横断面研究。通过临床和电诊断标准确诊CTS。受试者完成了BCTQ,并分析了BCTQ评分与诸如正中神经横截面积和神经传导研究等客观指标之间的相关性。统计分析包括跨CTS严重程度组的比较以及基于年龄和任期的亚组评估。BCTQ与客观指标显示出中等相关性,SSS和FSS评分之间存在强相关性(r = 0.86,<0.001)。然而,SSS和FSS的敏感性有限,尤其是对于严重CTS病例。矛盾的是,严重病例中较低的分数可能反映了问卷的局限性或适应性反应。针对疼痛和感觉症状的针对性问题显示出更好的敏感性(>80%),可能会指导临床医生识别轻度CTS病例。虽然BCTQ仍然是评估CTS的有价值工具,但其局限性需要补充使用客观诊断工具,尤其是对于严重病例。未来的改进,如量身定制的评分系统以及与临床指标的整合,可能会提高其诊断效用,并确保对CTS严重程度进行全面评估。