Suppr超能文献

虚拟筛选:希望、炒作与二者之间的微妙界限。

Virtual screening: hope, hype, and the fine line in between.

作者信息

Nada Hossam, Meanwell Nicholas A, Gabr Moustafa T

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Innovations Institute (MI3), Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

Baruch S. Blumberg Institute, Doylestown, PA, USA, School of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

出版信息

Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2025 Feb;20(2):145-162. doi: 10.1080/17460441.2025.2458666. Epub 2025 Jan 27.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Technological advancements in virtual screening (VS) have rapidly accelerated its application in drug discovery, as reflected by the exponential growth in VS-related publications. However, a significant gap remains between the volume of computational predictions and their experimental validation. This discrepancy has led to a rise in the number of unverified 'claimed' hits which impedes the drug discovery efforts.

AREAS COVERED

This perspective examines the current VS landscape, highlighting essential practices and identifying critical challenges, limitations, and common pitfalls. Using case studies and practices, this perspective aims to highlight strategies that can effectively mitigate or overcome these challenges. Furthermore, the perspective explores common approaches for addressing pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic issues in optimizing VS hits.

EXPERT OPINION

VS has become a tried-and-true technique of drug discovery due to the rapid advances in computational methods and machine learning (ML) over the past two decades. Although each VS workflow varies depending on the chosen approach and methodology, integrated strategies that combine biological and in silico data have consistently yielded higher success rates. Moreover, the widespread adoption of ML has enhanced the integration of VS into the drug discovery pipeline. However, the absence of standardized evaluation criteria hinders the objective assessment of VS studies' success and the identification of optimal adoption methods.

摘要

引言

虚拟筛选(VS)技术的进步迅速推动了其在药物发现中的应用,VS相关出版物呈指数级增长即反映了这一点。然而,计算预测的数量与其实验验证之间仍存在显著差距。这种差异导致未经验证的“声称”命中数增加,阻碍了药物发现工作。

涵盖领域

本观点审视了当前的VS格局,突出了基本实践,并确定了关键挑战、局限性和常见陷阱。通过案例研究和实践,本观点旨在强调能够有效缓解或克服这些挑战的策略。此外,该观点探讨了在优化VS命中物时解决药效学和药代动力学问题的常见方法。

专家意见

由于过去二十年来计算方法和机器学习(ML)的快速发展,VS已成为一种经过验证的药物发现技术。尽管每个VS工作流程因所选方法和方法论而异,但结合生物学和计算机数据的综合策略一直具有更高的成功率。此外,ML的广泛应用增强了VS在药物发现流程中的整合。然而,缺乏标准化评估标准阻碍了对VS研究成功与否的客观评估以及最佳采用方法的确定。

相似文献

1
Virtual screening: hope, hype, and the fine line in between.虚拟筛选:希望、炒作与二者之间的微妙界限。
Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2025 Feb;20(2):145-162. doi: 10.1080/17460441.2025.2458666. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
2
The compromise of virtual screening and its impact on drug discovery.虚拟筛选的折衷及其对药物发现的影响。
Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2019 Jul;14(7):619-637. doi: 10.1080/17460441.2019.1604677. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
3
Virtual Screening Meets Deep Learning.虚拟筛选与深度学习相遇
Curr Comput Aided Drug Des. 2019;15(1):6-28. doi: 10.2174/1573409914666181018141602.
9
Perspectives on current approaches to virtual screening in drug discovery.对当前药物发现中虚拟筛选方法的看法。
Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2024 Oct;19(10):1173-1183. doi: 10.1080/17460441.2024.2390511. Epub 2024 Aug 12.

本文引用的文献

5
PT-Finder: A multi-modal neural network approach to target identification.PT-Finder:一种多模态神经网络目标识别方法。
Comput Biol Med. 2024 May;174:108444. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108444. Epub 2024 Apr 15.
6
The Science and Art of Structure-Based Virtual Screening.基于结构的虚拟筛选的科学与艺术。
ACS Med Chem Lett. 2024 Mar 25;15(4):436-440. doi: 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.4c00093. eCollection 2024 Apr 11.
10
DrugBank 6.0: the DrugBank Knowledgebase for 2024.DrugBank 6.0:2024 年版 DrugBank 知识库。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2024 Jan 5;52(D1):D1265-D1275. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad976.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验