• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于矫治器附件的不同脱粘技术后三维地形学牙釉质表面变化:一项显微CT研究

3-Dimensional topographic enamel surface changes after different debonding techniques for aligner attachments: a micro-CT study.

作者信息

Turkoglu Hilal, Atik Ezgi

机构信息

Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics , Hacettepe University, Sihhiye, Ankara, 06100, Turkey.

出版信息

Clin Oral Investig. 2025 Jan 25;29(1):89. doi: 10.1007/s00784-025-06188-6.

DOI:10.1007/s00784-025-06188-6
PMID:39862244
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11762567/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate topographic changes of enamel surface in 3-dimensional after different debonding methods of aligner attachments formed with 2 different composite resins.

METHODS

Vertical rectangular attachments were created on 88 premolar teeth and divided into two composite resin groups (Group 1:flowable, Group 2:packable) (N = 44). These were then divided into two subgroups (N = 22) using different debonding methods. In Group A, the attachments were firstly removed using an attachment debonding plier and then with white fiberglass. Following, the tooth surfaces were polished with blue fiberglass. In Group B, the excess attachment composite was removed with a 12-blade carbide bur, followed by a 24-blade carbide bur, and tooth surfaces were polished with Renew stone. The remaining composite volume was measured using Geomagic Control X software. Enamel surface roughness and morphological change were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Residual composite resin volume did not show a statistically significant difference between composite resin groups (1-2 A). The enamel demineralization volume and area changes in Group 2 A were significantly higher than observed in 2B (p < 0.05). Roughness parameters Ra (T1-T0), Ra (T2-T0), Rq (T1-T0), and Sa (T1-T0) were significantly higher in Group 1B compared to Group 1 A (p < 0.05). Similarly, Ra (T1-T0), Sa (T1-T0), and Sq (T1-T0) parameters were significantly higher in Group 2B compared to Group 2 A (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Fiberglass with a debonding plier produced a smoother enamel surface compared to carbide burs, but caused significantly more enamel demineralization, as seen in micro-CT evaluations after polishing.

摘要

引言

评估用两种不同复合树脂制成的隐形矫治器附件在不同脱粘方法后牙釉质表面的三维地形变化。

方法

在88颗前磨牙上制作垂直矩形附件,并分为两个复合树脂组(第1组:可流动树脂,第2组:可压实树脂)(每组n = 44)。然后使用不同的脱粘方法将这些组再分为两个亚组(每组n = 22)。在A组中,首先使用附件脱粘钳去除附件,然后使用白色玻璃纤维。随后,用蓝色玻璃纤维对牙齿表面进行抛光。在B组中,先用12刃硬质合金车针去除多余的附着复合树脂,再用24刃硬质合金车针,并用Renew磨石对牙齿表面进行抛光。使用Geomagic Control X软件测量剩余复合树脂体积。比较各组之间的牙釉质表面粗糙度和形态变化。

结果

复合树脂组之间的残余复合树脂体积没有显示出统计学上的显著差异(1 - 2A)。2A组的牙釉质脱矿体积和面积变化显著高于2B组(p < 0.05)。与1A组相比,1B组的粗糙度参数Ra(T1 - T0)、Ra(T2 - T0)、Rq(T1 - T0)和Sa(T1 - T0)显著更高(p < 0.05)。同样,与2A组相比,2B组的Ra(T1 - T0)、Sa(T1 - T0)和Sq(T1 - T0)参数显著更高(p < 0.05)。

结论

与硬质合金车针相比,使用脱粘钳的玻璃纤维能产生更光滑的牙釉质表面,但在抛光后的显微CT评估中,会导致更多的牙釉质脱矿。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab41/11762567/11602e5dc144/784_2025_6188_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab41/11762567/d4830483339c/784_2025_6188_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab41/11762567/d9754a860dc3/784_2025_6188_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab41/11762567/8b92df724901/784_2025_6188_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab41/11762567/73f9488c2471/784_2025_6188_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab41/11762567/d5227467d884/784_2025_6188_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab41/11762567/5d3f89c00cee/784_2025_6188_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab41/11762567/11602e5dc144/784_2025_6188_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab41/11762567/d4830483339c/784_2025_6188_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab41/11762567/d9754a860dc3/784_2025_6188_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab41/11762567/8b92df724901/784_2025_6188_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab41/11762567/73f9488c2471/784_2025_6188_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab41/11762567/d5227467d884/784_2025_6188_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab41/11762567/5d3f89c00cee/784_2025_6188_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab41/11762567/11602e5dc144/784_2025_6188_Fig8_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
3-Dimensional topographic enamel surface changes after different debonding techniques for aligner attachments: a micro-CT study.用于矫治器附件的不同脱粘技术后三维地形学牙釉质表面变化:一项显微CT研究
Clin Oral Investig. 2025 Jan 25;29(1):89. doi: 10.1007/s00784-025-06188-6.
2
Evaluation of enamel roughness after orthodontic debonding and clean-up procedures using zirconia, tungsten carbide, and white stone burs: an in vitro study.评价氧化锆、碳化钨和白宝石车针对正畸去带及清洁后牙釉质粗糙度的影响:一项体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Jul 13;23(1):478. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03194-6.
3
Effect of different resin removal methods on enamel after metal and ceramic bracket debonding : An in vitro micro-computed tomography study.金属和陶瓷托槽脱粘后不同树脂去除方法对牙釉质的影响:一项体外微型计算机断层扫描研究
J Orofac Orthop. 2022 May;83(3):157-171. doi: 10.1007/s00056-021-00306-1. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
4
Does staining orthodontic adhesive provide an advantage in adhesive resin removal and enamel roughness? An in vitro study.正畸粘接剂染色是否有利于去除粘接树脂和增加釉质粗糙度?一项体外研究。
Int Orthod. 2024 Dec;22(4):100915. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2024.100915. Epub 2024 Sep 5.
5
In vitro evaluation of enamel surface roughness and morphology after orthodontic debonding: Traditional cleanup systems versus polymer bur.正畸去带后釉质表面粗糙度和形态的体外评估:传统清洁系统与聚合体车针。
Int Orthod. 2020 Sep;18(3):546-554. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2020.04.006. Epub 2020 May 31.
6
A Comparative Evaluation of Enamel Surface Roughness of Two Different Bonding Adhesives After Debonding With Atomic Force Microscopy.使用原子力显微镜对两种不同粘结剂脱粘后牙釉质表面粗糙度的比较评估
Cureus. 2022 Nov 18;14(11):e31661. doi: 10.7759/cureus.31661. eCollection 2022 Nov.
7
Enamel surface roughness of preferred debonding and polishing protocols.首选脱粘和抛光方案的牙釉质表面粗糙度
J Orthod. 2016 Mar;43(1):39-46. doi: 10.1179/1465313315Y.0000000009. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
8
Comparison of Enamel Surface Roughness after Bracket Debonding and Adhesive Resin Removal Using Different Burs with and without the Aid of a Magnifying Loupe.比较使用带/不带放大镜助视器的不同车针在托槽去除和粘结剂去除后对釉质表面粗糙度的影响。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2022 Nov 1;23(11):1091-1099. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3432.
9
Enamel Surface Roughness after Debonding: A Comparative Study using Three Different Burs.脱粘后牙釉质表面粗糙度:使用三种不同车针的比较研究
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018 May 1;19(5):521-526.
10
Enamel loss and adhesive remnants following bracket removal and various clean-up procedures in vitro.体外研究托槽去除及各种清洁程序后牙釉质的损耗和残留粘结剂。
Eur J Orthod. 2012 Feb;34(1):25-32. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq128. Epub 2011 Jan 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Enamel Surface Integrity after De-Bracketing as Affected by Seven Different Orthodontic Residual Cement Removal Systems.七种不同正畸残留粘结剂去除系统对去粘结后牙釉质表面完整性的影响比较
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Oct 23;13(20):3284. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13203284.
2
Evaluation of enamel roughness after orthodontic debonding and clean-up procedures using zirconia, tungsten carbide, and white stone burs: an in vitro study.评价氧化锆、碳化钨和白宝石车针对正畸去带及清洁后牙釉质粗糙度的影响:一项体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Jul 13;23(1):478. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03194-6.
3
In vitro enamel surface roughness analysis of 4 methods for removal of remaining orthodontic adhesive after bracket debonding.
四种用于去除托槽脱粘后残留正畸粘合剂的方法的体外牙釉质表面粗糙度分析
Angle Orthod. 2023 Mar 1;93(2):213-221. doi: 10.2319/031722-227.1.
4
Effect of different resin removal methods on enamel after metal and ceramic bracket debonding : An in vitro micro-computed tomography study.金属和陶瓷托槽脱粘后不同树脂去除方法对牙釉质的影响:一项体外微型计算机断层扫描研究
J Orofac Orthop. 2022 May;83(3):157-171. doi: 10.1007/s00056-021-00306-1. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
5
Minimizing the aerosol-generating procedures in orthodontics in the era of a pandemic: Current evidence on the reduction of hazardous effects for the treatment team and patients.在大流行时代尽量减少正畸科的气溶胶生成操作:减少治疗团队和患者危险影响的当前证据。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020 Sep;158(3):330-342. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.06.002. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
6
The use of attachments in aligner treatment: Analyzing the "innovation" of expanding the use of acid etching-mediated bonding of composites to enamel and its consequences.附件在矫正器治疗中的应用:分析“创新”扩大酸蚀介导的复合材料与牙釉质结合的应用及其后果。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020 Aug;158(2):166-174. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.04.008. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
7
Comparative evaluation of enamel surface roughness after debonding using four finishing and polishing systems for residual resin removal-an in vitro study.四种用于去除残留树脂的修整抛光系统对牙釉质表面粗糙度影响的体外对比研究。
Prog Orthod. 2019 May 6;20(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s40510-019-0269-x.
8
Clear aligners in orthodontic treatment.正畸治疗中的透明矫治器。
Aust Dent J. 2017 Mar;62 Suppl 1:58-62. doi: 10.1111/adj.12480.
9
Three-dimensional analysis of enamel surface alteration resulting from orthodontic clean-up -comparison of three different tools.正畸清理导致的牙釉质表面改变的三维分析——三种不同工具的比较
BMC Oral Health. 2015 Nov 18;15(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12903-015-0131-6.
10
Enamel surface evaluation after bracket debonding and different resin removal methods.托槽拆除及不同树脂去除方法后的釉质表面评估
Dental Press J Orthod. 2015 Mar-Apr;20(2):61-7. doi: 10.1590/2176-9451.20.2.061-067.oar.