Turkoglu Hilal, Atik Ezgi
Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics , Hacettepe University, Sihhiye, Ankara, 06100, Turkey.
Clin Oral Investig. 2025 Jan 25;29(1):89. doi: 10.1007/s00784-025-06188-6.
To evaluate topographic changes of enamel surface in 3-dimensional after different debonding methods of aligner attachments formed with 2 different composite resins.
Vertical rectangular attachments were created on 88 premolar teeth and divided into two composite resin groups (Group 1:flowable, Group 2:packable) (N = 44). These were then divided into two subgroups (N = 22) using different debonding methods. In Group A, the attachments were firstly removed using an attachment debonding plier and then with white fiberglass. Following, the tooth surfaces were polished with blue fiberglass. In Group B, the excess attachment composite was removed with a 12-blade carbide bur, followed by a 24-blade carbide bur, and tooth surfaces were polished with Renew stone. The remaining composite volume was measured using Geomagic Control X software. Enamel surface roughness and morphological change were compared between the groups.
Residual composite resin volume did not show a statistically significant difference between composite resin groups (1-2 A). The enamel demineralization volume and area changes in Group 2 A were significantly higher than observed in 2B (p < 0.05). Roughness parameters Ra (T1-T0), Ra (T2-T0), Rq (T1-T0), and Sa (T1-T0) were significantly higher in Group 1B compared to Group 1 A (p < 0.05). Similarly, Ra (T1-T0), Sa (T1-T0), and Sq (T1-T0) parameters were significantly higher in Group 2B compared to Group 2 A (p < 0.05).
Fiberglass with a debonding plier produced a smoother enamel surface compared to carbide burs, but caused significantly more enamel demineralization, as seen in micro-CT evaluations after polishing.
评估用两种不同复合树脂制成的隐形矫治器附件在不同脱粘方法后牙釉质表面的三维地形变化。
在88颗前磨牙上制作垂直矩形附件,并分为两个复合树脂组(第1组:可流动树脂,第2组:可压实树脂)(每组n = 44)。然后使用不同的脱粘方法将这些组再分为两个亚组(每组n = 22)。在A组中,首先使用附件脱粘钳去除附件,然后使用白色玻璃纤维。随后,用蓝色玻璃纤维对牙齿表面进行抛光。在B组中,先用12刃硬质合金车针去除多余的附着复合树脂,再用24刃硬质合金车针,并用Renew磨石对牙齿表面进行抛光。使用Geomagic Control X软件测量剩余复合树脂体积。比较各组之间的牙釉质表面粗糙度和形态变化。
复合树脂组之间的残余复合树脂体积没有显示出统计学上的显著差异(1 - 2A)。2A组的牙釉质脱矿体积和面积变化显著高于2B组(p < 0.05)。与1A组相比,1B组的粗糙度参数Ra(T1 - T0)、Ra(T2 - T0)、Rq(T1 - T0)和Sa(T1 - T0)显著更高(p < 0.05)。同样,与2A组相比,2B组的Ra(T1 - T0)、Sa(T1 - T0)和Sq(T1 - T0)参数显著更高(p < 0.05)。
与硬质合金车针相比,使用脱粘钳的玻璃纤维能产生更光滑的牙釉质表面,但在抛光后的显微CT评估中,会导致更多的牙釉质脱矿。