Cortes-Puentes G A, Matatko M, Bartholmai B J, Edell E S, Lim K G
Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Charles University, Šimkova 870, 500 03, Hradec Králové 3, Czech Republic.
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 25;15(1):3278. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-86725-1.
Tracheobronchomalacia (TBM) presents diagnostic challenges due to its nonspecific symptoms and variability in diagnostic methods. This study evaluates physician concordance in TBM diagnosis and phenotyping using chest computed tomography (CT) scans with dynamic expiratory views. We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study at Mayo Clinic Rochester, analyzing 150 patients with dynamic expiratory CT scans. Three specialists-a thoracic radiologist, a bronchoscopist, and a pulmonologist-reviewed identical CT scans, blinded to prior interpretations. Inter-rater agreement was assessed using Fleiss's Kappa for TBM diagnosis and Cohen's Kappa for TBM phenotype classification into six categories: No TBM, Excessive Dynamic Airway Collapse (EDAC), Crescent Type, Circumferential Type, Saber-Sheath Type, and Mixed Type. Among the 150 patients, 54 (36%) were diagnosed with TBM or EDAC. TBM was more prevalent in males, older individuals, and smokers. Agreement among specialists was substantial for TBM diagnosis (Fleiss's Kappa = 0.61, p < 0.001) but moderate for phenotype classification (Fleiss's Kappa = 0.52, p < 0.001). The highest concordance was between the thoracic radiologist and the pulmonologist (Cohen's Kappa = 0.68), while the lowest was between the bronchoscopist and other specialists. There is substantial agreement in TBM diagnosis using chest CT scans with dynamic expiratory views, but moderate variability in phenotyping. Standardizing criteria and integrating pulmonary function testing could enhance diagnostic consistency and clinical relevance.
气管支气管软化症(TBM)因其非特异性症状和诊断方法的多样性而面临诊断挑战。本研究使用胸部计算机断层扫描(CT)动态呼气视图评估医生在TBM诊断和表型分型方面的一致性。我们在罗切斯特梅奥诊所进行了一项回顾性横断面研究,分析了150例有动态呼气CT扫描的患者。三位专家——一位胸放射科医生、一位支气管镜检查医生和一位肺科医生——在不知道先前解读结果的情况下,对相同的CT扫描进行了评估。使用Fleiss卡方检验评估TBM诊断的评分者间一致性,使用Cohen卡方检验将TBM表型分为六类:无TBM、过度动态气道塌陷(EDAC)、新月型、环周型、剑鞘型和混合型。在这150例患者中,54例(36%)被诊断为TBM或EDAC。TBM在男性、老年人和吸烟者中更为常见。专家之间在TBM诊断方面的一致性较高(Fleiss卡方 = 0.61,p < 0.001),但在表型分类方面为中等程度(Fleiss卡方 = 0.52,p < 0.001)。胸放射科医生和肺科医生之间的一致性最高(Cohen卡方 = 0.68),而支气管镜检查医生与其他专家之间的一致性最低。使用胸部CT动态呼气视图进行TBM诊断有较高的一致性,但在表型分型方面存在中等程度的差异。标准化标准并整合肺功能测试可以提高诊断的一致性和临床相关性。