Feng Shuo, Zhu QiRui, Sun Yang, Ding ZiYao, Zhuang Zhe, Yu Heng-Heng, Sun Ma-Ji, Yuan Feng
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, 99 Huaihai Road, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, 221002, China.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Fengxian People's Hospital, 4002 Jiangkang Road, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, 221700, China.
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Jan 27;20(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05491-y.
To compare the efficacy and safety of skip titanium plates combined with adjacent spinous process suture suspension versus continuous titanium plate fixation in cervical laminoplasty.
A retrospective analysis of 125 patients (62 men, 63 women, average age 60.9 ± 10.4 years) with multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy who had cervical laminoplasty with Arch titanium plate fixation from January 2012 to March 2024 in our hospital was done. Patients were stratified into two cohorts based on the fixation technique: Group A (n = 64): Modified technique of skip-level titanium plate fixation (Arch titanium plates at C4 and C6 levels combined with adjacent spinous process suture suspension)Group B (n = 61): Continuous plating (Arch titanium plates applied sequentially from C3 to C7).The comparative analysis focused on perioperative parameters (operative duration, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay), economic factors (hospital costs), and various clinical indicators.
The average follow up period was (73.0 ± 38.4) months. Both groups showed no significant differences in gender, age, and disease duration (P > 0.05). Group A had lower hospitalization costs, intraoperative blood loss, operation time, and postoperative hospital stay compared to Group B (P < 0.05). Postoperatively, both groups had significant improvements in JOA scores and NDI (P < 0.005), but there were no significant differences in postoperative scores and improvement rates between the two groups (P > 0.05). At 3 months postoperatively and at the last follow-up, the C2-7 Cobb angle and cervical curvature index decreased compared to preoperative values (P < 0.05), with a significant difference in the C2-7 Cobb angle at the last follow-up (P < 0.05). The sagittal diameter of the spinal canal from C3 to C7 significantly increased (P < 0.05), but there were no significant differences in the improvement of C3, C5, and C7 between the two groups (P > 0.05). At 3 months postoperatively, the opening angles of the C4 and C6 laminae in Group A were smaller than those in Group B (P < 0.05), but there were no significant differences at the last follow-up (P > 0.05). The healing of the C4 and C6 laminae in Group B was superior to that in Group A (P < 0.05), but there were no differences in healing at the last follow-up (P > 0.05). The incidence of axial symptoms was similar (10.9% in Group A and 14.8% in Group B, P = 0.523).
During C3-7 laminoplasty, the clinical efficacy of the method combining mini titanium plate fixation (at C4 and C6) with suture fixation is comparable to that of continuous fixation. Moreover, it has an advantage in cost control.
比较跳跃式钛板联合相邻棘突缝合悬吊与连续钛板固定在颈椎椎板成形术中的疗效和安全性。
回顾性分析2012年1月至2024年3月在我院接受颈椎椎板成形术并采用Arch钛板固定的125例多节段脊髓型颈椎病患者(男62例,女63例,平均年龄60.9±10.4岁)。根据固定技术将患者分为两组:A组(n = 64):改良的跳跃式钛板固定技术(C4和C6水平使用Arch钛板联合相邻棘突缝合悬吊);B组(n = 61):连续植骨(从C3至C7依次应用Arch钛板)。对比分析集中在围手术期参数(手术时长、术中出血量、住院时间)、经济因素(住院费用)和各项临床指标。
平均随访时间为(73.0±38.4)个月。两组在性别、年龄和病程方面均无显著差异(P > 0.05)。与B组相比,A组的住院费用、术中出血量、手术时间和术后住院时间更低(P < 0.05)。术后,两组的JOA评分和NDI均有显著改善(P < 0.005),但两组术后评分及改善率无显著差异(P > 0.05)。术后3个月及末次随访时,C2-7 Cobb角和颈椎曲度指数较术前降低(P < 0.05),末次随访时C2-7 Cobb角有显著差异(P < 0.05)。C3至C7椎管矢状径显著增加(P < 0.05),但两组在C3、C5和C7的改善方面无显著差异(P > 0.05)。术后3个月时,A组C4和C6椎板的开口角度小于B组(P < 0.05),但末次随访时无显著差异(P > 0.05)。B组C4和C6椎板的愈合情况优于A组(P < 0.05),但末次随访时愈合情况无差异(P > 0.05)。轴性症状的发生率相似(A组为10.9%,B组为14.8%,P = 0.523)。
在C3-7椎板成形术中,小型钛板固定(C4和C6)联合缝线固定的方法临床疗效与连续固定相当。此外,在成本控制方面具有优势。