Ibrahim Nadine I, Cherry Megan M, Keilin Charles A, Abdulrazzak Obada, Anidi Chioma, Epperson Madison V, Jones Gerilyn, Banakis Hartl Renee M
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Audiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Apr;172(4):1254-1261. doi: 10.1002/ohn.1106. Epub 2025 Jan 26.
Evaluate inpatient audiometry on clinical decision-making. Assess stakeholder perspectives on the practice of inpatient audiometry and financial impact.
This is a mixed methods study utilizing retrospective chart review, a focus group, and financial analyses.
Academic tertiary referral center.
Included subjects were adults (18+) admitted from 2015 to 2022 who received an inpatient audiogram (n = 302). A binary assessment of whether audiograms impacted inpatient clinical management was determined. Financial analyses estimated the cost of audiograms. An audiology focus group was conducted.
The average age was 51 years. Thirty-nine percent were female. Seventy percent of inpatient audiograms were associated with Otolaryngology consultation. Inpatient audiograms were performed an average of 3.6 days after request (0-47 days, 90th percentile 8.2 days). Forty-nine percent were performed within 1 day. Twenty-three percent were performed for acute hearing loss. Ototoxic monitoring was the most frequent indication (15%). Sixty-two percent of audiograms did not impact the initiation or withholding of treatment. Inpatient testing results in a 63% increase in cost over outpatient. Audiologists endorsed challenges with equipment, patient-level factors, and system-level challenges.
Inpatient audiometry is resource-intensive without significant data examining the impact and clinical utility. In most cases, inpatient audiometry is not used in the decision to withhold or deliver treatment and may cost 63% more than outpatient audiograms. While inpatient audiometry has a critical role in appropriate settings, system optimization and guidelines are necessary. Outpatient audiograms may suffice for the majority of otologic consults in combination with a thorough history and physical exam. Additional study across institutions with variable practice would be beneficial to establish broader recommendations.
评估住院听力测定对临床决策的影响。评估利益相关者对住院听力测定实践及其财务影响的看法。
这是一项混合方法研究,采用回顾性病历审查、焦点小组和财务分析。
学术三级转诊中心。
纳入的受试者为2015年至2022年入院的成年人(18岁及以上),他们接受了住院听力图检查(n = 302)。确定听力图是否影响住院临床管理的二元评估。财务分析估计了听力图的成本。进行了一次听力学焦点小组讨论。
平均年龄为51岁。39%为女性。70%的住院听力图与耳鼻喉科会诊相关。住院听力图平均在申请后3.6天进行(0 - 47天,第90百分位数为8.2天)。49%在1天内完成。23%是针对急性听力损失进行的。耳毒性监测是最常见的指征(15%)。62%的听力图对治疗的开始或停止没有影响。住院检查的成本比门诊高63%。听力学家认可在设备、患者层面因素和系统层面存在挑战。
住院听力测定资源密集,但缺乏大量研究来检验其影响和临床效用。在大多数情况下,住院听力测定未用于治疗的停止或给予决策,且成本可能比门诊听力图高63%。虽然住院听力测定在适当的环境中有关键作用,但系统优化和指南是必要的。结合全面的病史和体格检查,门诊听力图可能足以满足大多数耳科会诊。跨不同实践机构的进一步研究将有助于制定更广泛的建议。