Collins Christopher E, Giammanco Peter Aldo, Trivedi Sunny M, Sarsour Reem O, Kricfalusi Mikayla, Elsissy Joseph G
California University of Science and Medicine, Colton, CA, USA.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
J Imaging Inform Med. 2025 Jan 27. doi: 10.1007/s10278-025-01412-x.
Rib pathology is uniquely difficult and time-consuming for radiologists to diagnose. AI can reduce radiologist workload and serve as a tool to improve accurate diagnosis. To date, no reviews have been performed synthesizing identification of rib fracture data on AI and its diagnostic performance on X-ray and CT scans of rib fractures and its comparison to physicians. The objectives of this study are to analyze the performance of artificial intelligence in diagnosing rib fracture on X-ray and computed tomography (CT) scan using multiple clinical studies and to compare it to that of physicians findings of rib fracture. A literature search was conducted on PubMed and Embase for articles regarding the use of artificial intelligence for the detection of rib fractures up until July 2024. AI model, number of cases, sensitivity, and comparison to physicians data was collected. A total of 29 studies, comprising 125,364 cases, were included in this review. The pooled sensitivity of AI models was 0.853. Nineteen of these studies compared their results to radiologists, orthopedic surgeons, or anesthesiologists, totalling 61 physicians. Of these 19 studies, the radiologists had a pooled sensitivity of 0.750. The sensitivity of AI in these studies by comparison was 0.840. The results suggest that artificial intelligence has a promising role in detecting rib fractures on X-ray and CT scans. In our interpretation, the performance of artificial intelligence is similar to, or better than, that of physicians, alluding to its encouraging potential in a clinical setting as it may reduce physician workload, improve reading efficiency, and lead to better patient outcomes.
肋骨病变的诊断对放射科医生来说极具难度且耗时。人工智能可以减轻放射科医生的工作量,并作为提高准确诊断的工具。迄今为止,尚未有综述综合人工智能对肋骨骨折数据的识别、其在肋骨骨折X线和CT扫描上的诊断性能以及与医生诊断结果的比较。本研究的目的是利用多项临床研究分析人工智能在X线和计算机断层扫描(CT)上诊断肋骨骨折的性能,并将其与医生对肋骨骨折的诊断结果进行比较。我们在PubMed和Embase上进行了文献检索,以查找截至2024年7月关于使用人工智能检测肋骨骨折的文章。收集了人工智能模型、病例数、敏感性以及与医生数据的比较等信息。本综述共纳入29项研究,涵盖125,364例病例。人工智能模型的合并敏感性为0.853。其中19项研究将其结果与放射科医生、骨科医生或麻醉医生进行了比较,涉及61名医生。在这19项研究中,放射科医生的合并敏感性为0.750。相比之下,这些研究中人工智能的敏感性为0.840。结果表明,人工智能在X线和CT扫描检测肋骨骨折方面具有广阔前景。在我们的解读中,人工智能的表现与医生相似,甚至优于医生,这暗示了其在临床环境中的巨大潜力,因为它可能减轻医生工作量、提高阅读效率并带来更好的患者治疗效果。