Fothergill Lauren, Hayes Niall, Latham Yvonne, Hamilton Jenny, Ahmed Saiqa, Holland Carol
Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Jan 27;25(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05650-6.
There is substantial interest among policy makers in using telecare to support independence in older adults. However, research on how telecare can be most beneficial in promoting independence is limited. This realist review aimed to understand the contexts in which telecare can support independence and for whom, to aid older people in remaining at home.
This realist review is consistent with the RAMESES quality and reporting standards. We followed a five-step process to conduct the review: (1) locating existing theories and concepts, (2) searching for evidence (3), selecting data, (4) extracting data, and (5) synthesising data. We analysed 32 studies published between 2004 and 2023 to identify core mechanisms of how telecare may lead to positive or negative impacts in the form of context-mechanism-outcome (CMO) configurations. CMOs were grouped into overall domains and contributed to an overall programme theory of how telecare works.
Four key domains across 12 CMO configurations were identified, which suggest how telecare can support older adults in living independently (1). Telecare services should support older adults' goal of staying at home by providing reassurance of help in an emergency and aid in detecting age-related deterioration (2). Telecare that supports autonomy by enabling choice over technological resources may support self-reliance and control over one's life, including choosing the level of monitoring, freedom to call for help if needed, and the ability to customise technology to suit needs (3). Telecare that enables connections to existing or new social networks may reduce loneliness and social isolation for those who lack social resources. Finally (4), telecare must integrate into everyday life by fitting people's existing context, skills, resources, and identity. To improve telecare implementation, consideration must be given to these mechanisms; otherwise, interventions risk being abandoned or underutilised and, as a result, may not adequately support older adults to remain living at home safely, creating a false sense of security.
Assessments of an individual's needs and preferences should be carried out to ensure that telecare enables autonomy, supports the goal of remaining at home, facilitates connections to social support, and promotes integration into everyday life.
PROSPERO CRD42021292384.
政策制定者对利用远程护理来支持老年人的独立生活有着浓厚兴趣。然而,关于远程护理如何在促进独立生活方面发挥最大益处的研究有限。这项现实主义综述旨在了解远程护理能够支持独立生活的背景以及适用于哪些人群,以帮助老年人居家养老。
这项现实主义综述符合RAMESES质量和报告标准。我们遵循五步流程进行综述:(1)查找现有理论和概念;(2)搜索证据;(3)选择数据;(4)提取数据;(5)综合数据。我们分析了2004年至2023年间发表的32项研究,以确定远程护理可能以情境 - 机制 - 结果(CMO)配置形式产生正面或负面影响的核心机制。CMO被归为总体领域,并形成了关于远程护理如何发挥作用的总体项目理论。
确定了12种CMO配置中的四个关键领域,这些领域表明了远程护理如何支持老年人独立生活(1)。远程护理服务应通过在紧急情况下提供帮助的保证以及协助检测与年龄相关的身体衰退,来支持老年人居家的目标(2)。通过允许对技术资源进行选择来支持自主性的远程护理,可能会支持自我依赖和对自己生活的掌控,包括选择监控级别、在需要时呼叫帮助的自由以及根据需求定制技术的能力(3)。能够连接到现有或新社交网络的远程护理,可能会减少那些缺乏社会资源的人的孤独感和社会隔离感。最后(4),远程护理必须通过适应人们现有的情境、技能、资源和身份融入日常生活。为了改善远程护理的实施,必须考虑这些机制;否则,干预措施可能会面临被放弃或未充分利用的风险,结果可能无法充分支持老年人安全地居家生活,从而产生一种虚假的安全感。
应评估个人的需求和偏好,以确保远程护理能够实现自主性、支持居家目标、促进与社会支持的联系并推动融入日常生活。
PROSPERO CRD42021292384