• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索患者对牙科心理社会评估数字工具的看法。

Exploring the Patients' Perspective on Digital Tools for Psychosocial Assessment in Dentistry.

作者信息

Kutschke Axel, Bechmann Bellarita, Häggman-Henrikson Birgitta, Wänman Anders, Durham Justin, Lövgren Anna

机构信息

Department of Orofacial Pain and Jaw Function, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.

Department of Orofacial Pain and Jaw Function, Gävle County Hospital, Public Dental Health County Council of Gävleborg, Gävle, Sweden.

出版信息

J Oral Rehabil. 2025 Apr;52(4):495-505. doi: 10.1111/joor.13909. Epub 2025 Jan 27.

DOI:10.1111/joor.13909
PMID:39871666
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11934849/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Psychosocial screening is a valuable part of the assessment of patients with orofacial pain, as psychosocial factors will affect prognosis and treatment outcomes. Paper-based questionnaires are predominately used to assess the degree of psychosocial comorbidity; however, digital alternatives for screening questionnaires may be more cost-effective and resource-saving if patients are receptive to using them.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate how patients perceive digital psychosocial screening in dentistry.

METHOD

Using a qualitative approach, individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of adult patients with orofacial pain (n = 16) recruited from specialist dental clinics in Umeå and Gävle, Sweden. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and then analysed using Qualitative Content Analysis. Before the interviews, patients first completed the paper-based questionnaires and then the digital version.

RESULTS

The analysis of patients' experiences resulted in an overarching theme: Patients appreciate a holistic approach, thus valuing psychosocial screening, and they particularly favour screening in a digital format. From this theme, two categories emerged: Perceptions about health shape patients' expectations of dental care, and with deeper understanding of the value of psychosocial assessment, patients appreciate a holistic approach that includes psychosocial factors. Digital screening is perceived by patients as a reliable, meaningful and environmentally sustainable method.

CONCLUSIONS

In general, the patients appreciated a holistic approach in dentistry and understood the value of psychosocial screening as part of this. From the patients' perspective, digital psychosocial screening was both acceptable and beneficial. The findings support the introduction of digital psychosocial screening into daily dental practice.

摘要

背景

心理社会筛查是口面部疼痛患者评估的重要组成部分,因为心理社会因素会影响预后和治疗效果。纸质问卷主要用于评估心理社会共病的程度;然而,如果患者愿意使用,数字版筛查问卷可能更具成本效益且节省资源。

目的

评估患者对牙科数字心理社会筛查的看法。

方法

采用定性研究方法,对从瑞典于默奥和耶夫勒的专科牙科诊所招募的成年口面部疼痛患者(n = 16)进行了有目的抽样的个人半结构化访谈。访谈内容逐字转录,然后使用定性内容分析法进行分析。在访谈前,患者首先完成纸质问卷,然后完成数字版问卷。

结果

对患者体验的分析得出一个总体主题:患者赞赏整体方法,因此重视心理社会筛查,他们尤其倾向于数字形式的筛查。从这个主题中出现了两个类别:对健康的认知塑造了患者对牙科护理的期望,随着对心理社会评估价值的更深入理解,患者赞赏包括心理社会因素的整体方法。患者认为数字筛查是一种可靠、有意义且环境可持续的方法。

结论

总体而言,患者赞赏牙科中的整体方法,并理解心理社会筛查作为其中一部分的价值。从患者的角度来看,数字心理社会筛查既可以接受又有益。这些发现支持将数字心理社会筛查引入日常牙科实践。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2abb/11934849/e2461b67fc3f/JOOR-52-495-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2abb/11934849/e2461b67fc3f/JOOR-52-495-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2abb/11934849/e2461b67fc3f/JOOR-52-495-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploring the Patients' Perspective on Digital Tools for Psychosocial Assessment in Dentistry.探索患者对牙科心理社会评估数字工具的看法。
J Oral Rehabil. 2025 Apr;52(4):495-505. doi: 10.1111/joor.13909. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
2
A new capitation payment system in dentistry: the patients' perspective.牙科领域的一种新型按人头付费制度:患者视角
Community Dent Health. 2015 Jun;32(2):83-8.
3
Managing chronic orofacial pain: A qualitative study of patients', doctors', and dentists' experiences.慢性口面部疼痛的管理:一项关于患者、医生和牙医经历的定性研究。
Br J Health Psychol. 2015 Nov;20(4):777-91. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12141. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
4
Patients' and Health Care Professionals' Perceptions of the Potential of Using the Digital Diabetes Questionnaire to Prepare for Diabetes Care Meetings: Qualitative Focus Group Interview Study.患者和医疗保健专业人员对使用数字糖尿病问卷为糖尿病护理会议做准备的潜力的看法:定性焦点小组访谈研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 19;22(8):e17504. doi: 10.2196/17504.
5
Patients' Expectations of Doctors' Clinical Competencies in the Digital Health Care Era: Qualitative Semistructured Interview Study Among Patients.患者在数字医疗时代对医生临床能力的期望:一项针对患者的定性半结构式访谈研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Aug 27;11:e51972. doi: 10.2196/51972.
6
Australian physiotherapists attitudes, perceptions, and behaviours towards psychosocial screening tools: a qualitative interpretive description study.澳大利亚物理治疗师对心理社会筛查工具的态度、认知和行为:一项质性解释性描述研究
Disabil Rehabil. 2024 Dec;46(26):6367-6375. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2024.2328315. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
7
Chronic orofacial pain. Understanding patients from two perspectives: the clinical view and the patient's experience.慢性口面部疼痛。从两个角度理解患者:临床视角与患者体验。
Swed Dent J Suppl. 2006(181):9-69.
8
Patients' experiences of temporomandibular disorders and related treatment.患者对颞下颌关节紊乱的体验及相关治疗。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Sep 8;23(1):653. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03230-5.
9
Understanding Older Adults' Experiences With a Digital Health Platform in General Practice: Qualitative Interview Study.理解老年人在全科医疗中使用数字健康平台的体验:定性访谈研究。
JMIR Aging. 2024 Aug 30;7:e59168. doi: 10.2196/59168.
10
Clinician experiences of healthy lifestyle promotion and perceptions of digital interventions as complementary tools for lifestyle behavior change in primary care.临床医生在基层医疗中促进健康生活方式的经验以及对数字干预作为生活方式行为改变辅助工具的看法。
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Aug 21;19(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0829-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Advances in orofacial pain research: a bibliometric analysis.口腔面部疼痛研究进展:文献计量分析
Front Neurol. 2025 Aug 14;16:1609437. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1609437. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Patients' perspectives on digital health tools.患者对数字健康工具的看法。
PEC Innov. 2023 May 26;2:100171. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100171. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Do web-based follow-up surveys have a better response rate than traditional paper-based questionnaires following outpatient arthroscopic rotator cuff repair? A randomized controlled trial.基于网络的随访调查是否比传统的门诊关节镜下肩袖修复后的纸质问卷有更好的应答率?一项随机对照试验。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2023 Apr;109(2):103479. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103479. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
3
Patients' and Clinicians' Perspectives on the Acceptability of Completing Digital Quality of Life Questionnaires During Routine Haemodialysis Clinics: A Mixed-Methods Study.
患者和临床医生对在常规血液透析诊所完成数字生活质量问卷的可接受性的看法:一项混合方法研究。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022 Jun 6;290:752-756. doi: 10.3233/SHTI220179.
4
Perspectives of Policy Makers and Service Users Concerning the Implementation of eHealth in Sweden: Interview Study.政策制定者和服务使用者对瑞典电子健康实施的看法:访谈研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 28;24(1):e28870. doi: 10.2196/28870.
5
Data Quality and Cost-effectiveness Analyses of Electronic and Paper-Based Interviewer-Administered Public Health Surveys: Systematic Review.电子和纸质访谈员管理的公共卫生调查的数据质量和成本效益分析:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 22;23(1):e21382. doi: 10.2196/21382.
6
Health Care Professionals' Experience of a Digital Tool for Patient Exchange, Anamnesis, and Triage in Primary Care: Qualitative Study.医疗保健专业人员对基层医疗中患者信息交换、病历及分诊数字工具的体验:定性研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2020 Dec 14;7(4):e21698. doi: 10.2196/21698.
7
SERIES: eHealth in primary care. Part 4: Addressing the challenges of implementation.系列:初级保健中的电子健康。第 4 部分:应对实施挑战。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2020 Dec;26(1):140-145. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2020.1826431.
8
Increasing gender differences in the prevalence and chronification of orofacial pain in the population.人口中口腔颌面部疼痛的患病率和慢性化程度的性别差异日益增大。
Pain. 2020 Aug;161(8):1768-1775. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001872. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
9
Measurement Equivalence of "Touch-Screen" versus "Paper-Based" Assessments of OHRQoL: A Randomized Crossover Trial.“触屏”与“纸质”口腔健康相关生活质量评估的测量等效性:一项随机交叉试验。
Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2020 May 29;12:199-204. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S248429. eCollection 2020.
10
Using e-Health in the physical therapeutic care process for patients with temporomandibular disorders: a qualitative study on the perspective of physical therapists and patients.在颞下颌关节紊乱病患者的物理治疗护理过程中使用电子健康:一项关于理疗师和患者观点的定性研究。
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Feb;44(4):617-624. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1775900. Epub 2020 Jun 16.