Suppr超能文献

大规模疫苗接种运动对2型疫苗衍生脊髓灰质炎病毒传播疫情的全球影响:一项中断时间序列分析

Global Impact of Mass Vaccination Campaigns on Circulating Type 2 Vaccine-Derived Poliovirus Outbreaks: An Interrupted Time-Series Analysis.

作者信息

Cooper Laura V, Bandyopadhyay Ananda S, Grassly Nicholas C, Gray Elizabeth J, Voorman Arie, Zipursky Simona, Blake Isobel M

机构信息

School of Public Health, Medical Research Council Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Polio Team, Seattle, Washington, USA.

出版信息

J Infect Dis. 2025 Feb 20;231(2):e446-e455. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiae614.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Between 2016 and 2023, 3248 cases of circulating vaccine-derived type 2 poliomyelitis (cVDPV2) were reported globally and supplementary immunization activities (SIAs) with monovalent type 2 oral poliovirus vaccine (mOPV2) and novel type 2 oral poliovirus vaccine (nOPV2) targeted an estimated 356 and 525 million children, respectively. This analysis estimates the community-level impact of nOPV2 relative to mOPV2 SIAs.

METHODS

We fitted interrupted time-series regressions to surveillance data between January 2016 and November 2023 to estimate the impact of nOPV2 and mOPV2 SIAs on cVDPV2 poliomyelitis incidence and prevalence in environmental surveillance across 37 countries, directly comparing the impact of SIAs in 13 countries where both vaccines were used.

RESULTS

We did not find any statistically significant differences between nOPV2 and mOPV2 SIA impact except for in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), where nOPV2 SIAs had lower impact (adjusted relative risk [aRR] for cVDPV2 poliomyelitis incidence per nOPV2 SIA, 0.505; 95% confidence interval [CI], .409-.623) compared to mOPV2 (aRR, 0.193; 95% CI, .137-.272); P value for difference in RRs = 3e-6.

CONCLUSIONS

We find variation in OPV2 SIA impacts globally, with greater certainty about Nigeria and DRC, where large outbreaks provided an opportunity to assess impact at scale. In most countries, we find no significant difference between nOPV2 and mOPV2 SIA impact. We are unable to identify the reason for the significant difference in DRC, which could include differential SIA coverage, timing, vaccine effectiveness, or outbreak dynamics.

摘要

背景

2016年至2023年期间,全球报告了3248例2型循环疫苗衍生脊髓灰质炎(cVDPV2)病例,单价2型口服脊髓灰质炎疫苗(mOPV2)和新型2型口服脊髓灰质炎疫苗(nOPV2)的补充免疫活动(SIAs)分别针对约3.56亿和5.25亿儿童。本分析估计了nOPV2相对于mOPV2补充免疫活动在社区层面的影响。

方法

我们对2016年1月至2023年11月期间的监测数据进行了中断时间序列回归分析,以估计nOPV2和mOPV2补充免疫活动对37个国家环境监测中cVDPV2脊髓灰质炎发病率和患病率的影响,并直接比较了在同时使用两种疫苗的13个国家中补充免疫活动的影响。

结果

除刚果民主共和国(DRC)外,我们未发现nOPV2和mOPV2补充免疫活动的影响存在任何统计学上的显著差异。在刚果民主共和国,与mOPV2(调整后相对风险[aRR]为0.193;95%置信区间[CI],0.137 - 0.272)相比,nOPV2补充免疫活动的影响较低(每nOPV2补充免疫活动cVDPV2脊髓灰质炎发病率的调整后相对风险[aRR]为0.505;95%置信区间[CI],0.409 - 0.623);RR差异的P值 = 3e - 6。

结论

我们发现全球范围内OPV2补充免疫活动的影响存在差异,在尼日利亚和刚果民主共和国的情况更具确定性,那里的大规模疫情为大规模评估影响提供了机会。在大多数国家,我们发现nOPV2和mOPV2补充免疫活动的影响没有显著差异。我们无法确定刚果民主共和国存在显著差异的原因,这可能包括补充免疫活动覆盖率、时间安排、疫苗效力或疫情动态的差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5d2/11841638/787a45116d64/jiae614f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验