Lazaridou Elizabeth, Apalla Zoe, Ravanidis Stylianos, Stefanou Garyfallia, Vellopoulou Katerina, Tsolakidis Anastasios, Mathioudakis Konstantinos, Kourlaba Georgia
Second Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, 54124, Greece.
ECONCARE, Athens, 11528, Greece.
Arch Dermatol Res. 2025 Jan 28;317(1):310. doi: 10.1007/s00403-024-03746-y.
Multiple parameters define the treatment course with biologics for a psoriatic patient while treatment switches are often associated with worse prognosis. The purpose of this study was to describe the switching patterns of biologics for psoriasis in the Greek market landscape and to detect associated factors that may impact the evolvement of selected therapy. This is a retrospective cohort study using data recorded in the nationwide digital prescription database of Greece. Patients with a diagnosis for psoriasis, with or without concomitant psoriatic arthritis (PsA), who had initiated a biologic treatment between January 1st 2016 and December 31st 2020 were included. Overall, 6,772 biologic-naïve patients were included. Patients treated with infliximab demonstrated the highest switching rates while those treated with ustekinumab and secukinumab the lowest. Secukinumab and brodalumab had the lowest rates of switch or re-initiation 12 months after initiation. Switches from secukinumab to brodalumab and ustekinumab and from adalimumab to secukinumab and ustekinumab were more frequently observed. The risk was significantly higher for patients with concurrent PsA and for women, while patients treated with brodalumab, secukinumab and ustekinumab demonstrated a lower risk compared to adalimumab. Antibodies against interleukins have lower switching rates compared to more traditional biologics. The time to switch is longer for the first transition highlighting the necessity to establish long term therapeutic options early in the treatment course. Concurrent PsA or gender may have a significant impact in outcome, thus they need to be considered before the launch of a selected therapy.
多种参数决定了银屑病患者使用生物制剂的治疗过程,而治疗转换往往与更差的预后相关。本研究的目的是描述希腊市场环境中银屑病生物制剂的转换模式,并检测可能影响所选治疗方案进展的相关因素。这是一项回顾性队列研究,使用了希腊全国数字处方数据库中记录的数据。纳入了在2016年1月1日至2020年12月31日期间开始生物制剂治疗的银屑病患者,无论是否伴有银屑病关节炎(PsA)。总体而言,纳入了6772例初治生物制剂的患者。接受英夫利昔单抗治疗的患者转换率最高,而接受乌司奴单抗和司库奇尤单抗治疗的患者转换率最低。司库奇尤单抗和布罗达单抗在开始治疗12个月后转换或重新开始治疗的发生率最低。从司库奇尤单抗转换为布罗达单抗和乌司奴单抗,以及从阿达木单抗转换为司库奇尤单抗和乌司奴单抗的情况更为常见。合并PsA的患者和女性的风险显著更高,而与阿达木单抗相比,接受布罗达单抗、司库奇尤单抗和乌司奴单抗治疗的患者风险较低。与更传统的生物制剂相比,抗白细胞介素抗体的转换率较低。首次转换的时间较长,这突出了在治疗过程早期建立长期治疗方案的必要性。合并PsA或性别可能对治疗结果有重大影响,因此在选择治疗方案之前需要考虑这些因素。